Improving contraceptive agency through peer social support: findings from a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of the I-CAN intervention in Uganda.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1544333
Erica Sedlander, Beth Phillips, Isabelle Thapar, Catherine Birabwa, Lauren Suchman, Madeline Griffith, Dinah Amongin, Ronald Wasswa, Lynn Atuyambe, Jenny Liu, Peter Waiswa, Kelsey Holt
{"title":"Improving contraceptive agency through peer social support: findings from a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of the I-CAN intervention in Uganda.","authors":"Erica Sedlander, Beth Phillips, Isabelle Thapar, Catherine Birabwa, Lauren Suchman, Madeline Griffith, Dinah Amongin, Ronald Wasswa, Lynn Atuyambe, Jenny Liu, Peter Waiswa, Kelsey Holt","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1544333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual and reproductive health organizations have been advocating for a human rights-based approach to contraceptive programming for many years, but progress has been slow. Peer social support shows promise to address structural and social barriers limiting women's agency to make and act on decisions related to contraception, but evidence-based models are lacking. Informed by Social Support Theory and the Contraceptive Agency Framework, we used human-centered design to develop \"I-CAN\", a community-based peer mentorship intervention in which experienced contraception users in Uganda provide tailored support to peers to promote agency and self-efficacy to use self-injectable contraception among women interested in this method. We conducted a six-month pilot of I-CAN and report here on qualitative findings from a longitudinal study exploring I-CAN's social support mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted serial in-depth interviews with <i>n</i> = 25 women who received mentorship at baseline, three months, and six months in 2023. We conducted parallel interviews with a comparison group (<i>n</i> = 15) without the intervention. Women were purposefully sampled for diversity in contraceptive use, district, and age. We analyzed interviews using a codebook informed by I-CAN's theory of action.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified two primary ways in which I-CAN peer social support appeared to improve mentee agency more than existing social support in the control group: (1) improved contraceptive knowledge, particularly allaying side effect concerns, and (2) improved ability to act on contraceptive preferences via communication with unsupportive partners, covert use, or accessing contraceptive services or products. Less prominent changes compared to the control included improved self-efficacy to self-inject and perceived control over and consciousness of the right to contraceptive choice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Underpinned by a human rights-based approach to contraception, the I-CAN intervention, shows promise that locally tailored peer social support models can effectively improve contraceptive agency, particularly related to knowledge and partner communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1544333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1544333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sexual and reproductive health organizations have been advocating for a human rights-based approach to contraceptive programming for many years, but progress has been slow. Peer social support shows promise to address structural and social barriers limiting women's agency to make and act on decisions related to contraception, but evidence-based models are lacking. Informed by Social Support Theory and the Contraceptive Agency Framework, we used human-centered design to develop "I-CAN", a community-based peer mentorship intervention in which experienced contraception users in Uganda provide tailored support to peers to promote agency and self-efficacy to use self-injectable contraception among women interested in this method. We conducted a six-month pilot of I-CAN and report here on qualitative findings from a longitudinal study exploring I-CAN's social support mechanisms.

Methods: We conducted serial in-depth interviews with n = 25 women who received mentorship at baseline, three months, and six months in 2023. We conducted parallel interviews with a comparison group (n = 15) without the intervention. Women were purposefully sampled for diversity in contraceptive use, district, and age. We analyzed interviews using a codebook informed by I-CAN's theory of action.

Results: We identified two primary ways in which I-CAN peer social support appeared to improve mentee agency more than existing social support in the control group: (1) improved contraceptive knowledge, particularly allaying side effect concerns, and (2) improved ability to act on contraceptive preferences via communication with unsupportive partners, covert use, or accessing contraceptive services or products. Less prominent changes compared to the control included improved self-efficacy to self-inject and perceived control over and consciousness of the right to contraceptive choice.

Conclusions: Underpinned by a human rights-based approach to contraception, the I-CAN intervention, shows promise that locally tailored peer social support models can effectively improve contraceptive agency, particularly related to knowledge and partner communication.

通过同伴社会支持改善避孕机构:对乌干达I-CAN干预的纵向定性评价结果。
背景:多年来,性健康和生殖健康组织一直倡导对避孕方案拟订采取基于人权的做法,但进展缓慢。同伴社会支持有望解决限制妇女做出与避孕有关的决定并采取行动的结构和社会障碍,但缺乏基于证据的模式。根据社会支持理论和避孕机构框架,我们采用以人为本的设计开发了“I-CAN”,这是一种基于社区的同伴指导干预,乌干达有经验的避孕使用者为同伴提供量身定制的支持,以促进对这种方法感兴趣的妇女使用自我注射避孕方法的代理和自我效能。我们进行了为期六个月的I-CAN试点,并在这里报告了一项探索I-CAN社会支持机制的纵向研究的定性结果。方法:我们对在2023年基线、3个月和6个月接受指导的n = 25名女性进行了系列深度访谈。我们在没有干预的情况下对对照组(n = 15)进行了平行访谈。有针对性地对妇女进行抽样调查,了解避孕药具使用、地区和年龄的多样性。我们使用I-CAN的行动理论提供的密码本分析访谈。结果:我们确定了两种主要方式,其中I-CAN同伴社会支持似乎比对照组现有的社会支持更能改善被指导者的代理:(1)提高避孕知识,特别是减轻副作用的担忧;(2)通过与不支持的伴侣沟通、秘密使用或获取避孕服务或产品,提高了对避孕偏好的行动能力。与对照组相比,不太显著的变化包括自我注射的自我效能和对避孕选择权利的感知控制和意识的提高。结论:在以人权为基础的避孕方法的基础上,I-CAN干预显示出当地量身定制的同伴社会支持模式可以有效改善避孕机构,特别是与知识和伙伴沟通有关的机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信