Co-design of a digital 24-hour time-use intervention with older adults and allied health professionals.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1544489
Henry T Blake, Aaron Davis, Maddison L Mellow, Melissa Hull, Bethany Robins, Kate Laver, Dorothea Dumuid, Timothy Olds, Hannah A D Keage, Lui Di Venuto, Ashleigh E Smith
{"title":"Co-design of a digital 24-hour time-use intervention with older adults and allied health professionals.","authors":"Henry T Blake, Aaron Davis, Maddison L Mellow, Melissa Hull, Bethany Robins, Kate Laver, Dorothea Dumuid, Timothy Olds, Hannah A D Keage, Lui Di Venuto, Ashleigh E Smith","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1544489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using co-design principles based on the Health CASCADE framework, we aimed to describe the collaborative process undertaken to develop a 24-hour time-use intervention, called Small Steps, which promoted gradual and incremental health-behavior change. A secondary aim was to reflect on the challenges and benefits of co-design in this project, offering insights into the \"why\" and \"how\" to co-design 24-hour time-use interventions with priority populations. Twelve participants were invited and participated in 6 co-design workshops (June 2023-January 2024). To prioritize older adults' views in the end-product, 8 adults aged >65 years (the target population) and 4 allied health professionals with >2 years' experience working with the target population were recruited. Workshops and activities were structured using the British Design Council's Double Diamond Design Process to stimulate design thinking. Where possible, participant-led documentation was used to reduce the bias associated with academic scribing and empower participants to provide input and facilitate ownership for the project. Workshop activities and discussions were captured through printouts, audio and iPad screen recordings and analyzed through reflexive thematic and content analysis. Co-designers contributed to all elements of the intervention including the website design, the content, and the level of researcher input during the intervention. Iterative improvements were made based on the unique perspectives and needs of the community experts. During the action planning process, older adults wanted both support and autonomy, while maintaining the freedom to adapt these options to their individual needs. Older adults also preferred a step-by-step approach, allowing for gradual behavior changes across the intervention to avoid feelings of becoming overwhelmed. The co-design process enabled the tailoring of the Small Steps intervention to the specific needs of its intended audience. Key factors contributing to the co-design included flexibility in the design process, fostering a supportive environment, and empowering participants through activities that guided and stimulated their thinking. These elements not only helped shape the development of Small Steps but reinforced the value of co-design in developing personalised interventions for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1544489"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1544489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using co-design principles based on the Health CASCADE framework, we aimed to describe the collaborative process undertaken to develop a 24-hour time-use intervention, called Small Steps, which promoted gradual and incremental health-behavior change. A secondary aim was to reflect on the challenges and benefits of co-design in this project, offering insights into the "why" and "how" to co-design 24-hour time-use interventions with priority populations. Twelve participants were invited and participated in 6 co-design workshops (June 2023-January 2024). To prioritize older adults' views in the end-product, 8 adults aged >65 years (the target population) and 4 allied health professionals with >2 years' experience working with the target population were recruited. Workshops and activities were structured using the British Design Council's Double Diamond Design Process to stimulate design thinking. Where possible, participant-led documentation was used to reduce the bias associated with academic scribing and empower participants to provide input and facilitate ownership for the project. Workshop activities and discussions were captured through printouts, audio and iPad screen recordings and analyzed through reflexive thematic and content analysis. Co-designers contributed to all elements of the intervention including the website design, the content, and the level of researcher input during the intervention. Iterative improvements were made based on the unique perspectives and needs of the community experts. During the action planning process, older adults wanted both support and autonomy, while maintaining the freedom to adapt these options to their individual needs. Older adults also preferred a step-by-step approach, allowing for gradual behavior changes across the intervention to avoid feelings of becoming overwhelmed. The co-design process enabled the tailoring of the Small Steps intervention to the specific needs of its intended audience. Key factors contributing to the co-design included flexibility in the design process, fostering a supportive environment, and empowering participants through activities that guided and stimulated their thinking. These elements not only helped shape the development of Small Steps but reinforced the value of co-design in developing personalised interventions for older adults.

与老年人和相关卫生专业人员共同设计数字24小时时间使用干预。
使用基于健康级联框架的协同设计原则,我们旨在描述开发24小时时间使用干预措施(称为Small Steps)的协作过程,该干预措施促进渐进和渐进式健康行为改变。第二个目的是在这个项目中反思共同设计的挑战和好处,为“为什么”和“如何”与优先人群共同设计24小时时间使用干预措施提供见解。12名参与者被邀请参加了6个共同设计研讨会(2023年6月至2024年1月)。为了在最终产品中优先考虑老年人的意见,我们招募了8名年龄在bbb至65岁之间的成年人(目标人群)和4名与目标人群有bbb至2年工作经验的专职卫生专业人员。工作坊和活动采用英国设计协会的双钻石设计流程来激发设计思维。在可能的情况下,使用参与者主导的文档来减少与学术记录相关的偏见,并授权参与者提供输入并促进项目的所有权。通过打印输出、音频和iPad屏幕记录捕捉讲习班活动和讨论,并通过反身性主题和内容分析进行分析。共同设计师对干预的所有元素都做出了贡献,包括网站设计、内容和干预期间研究人员的投入水平。基于社区专家的独特观点和需求进行了迭代改进。在行动计划过程中,老年人既需要支持,也需要自主权,同时保持根据个人需求调整这些选择的自由。老年人也更喜欢循序渐进的方法,允许在干预过程中逐渐改变行为,以避免感到不知所措。协同设计过程使“小步骤”干预措施能够适应其目标受众的特定需求。促成协同设计的关键因素包括设计过程中的灵活性,培养支持性环境,以及通过引导和激发参与者思维的活动赋予他们权力。这些因素不仅帮助形成了“小步骤”的发展,而且加强了共同设计在为老年人制定个性化干预措施方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信