Contribution of 3D visualization and printing in teaching lung segments anatomy.

IF 3.1 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Gabrielle Drevet, Valentin Soldea, Sylvain Gouttard, Melia Virely, Jean-Michel Maury, François Tronc
{"title":"Contribution of 3D visualization and printing in teaching lung segments anatomy.","authors":"Gabrielle Drevet, Valentin Soldea, Sylvain Gouttard, Melia Virely, Jean-Michel Maury, François Tronc","doi":"10.1186/s41205-025-00272-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The knowledge and understanding of the anatomy of lung segments is of great importance while segmentectomies are increasingly performed. To introduce new technologies and tools in anatomy teaching could help students to improve their skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students participants (n = 16) were divided into 3 groups: traditional (n = 5), 3D visualization (n = 5) and 3D printing group (n = 6). Each student took a pre- and post-test exam. The traditional teaching group had lessons using 2D anatomical drawings, the 3D visualization group had lessons using a dedicated software allowing anatomical 3D reconstructions and the 3D printing group had lessons using 3D printed anatomical models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students of the whole cohort had significant better scores at the post test (mean score = 14.2) compared to the pretest (mean score = 7.9) (p = 0.0011). In the traditional and 3D printing groups, students had significant better scores in the post-test (mean scores = 17.7 and 14.2 respectively) than in the pre-test (mean scores = 8.2 and 7.5; p = 0.0247 and p = 0.0003 respectively). There was no significant difference between the pre and post-test scores for the 3D visualization group (mean score = 8.2 and 11.7 respectively) (p = 0.4347).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The knowledge of lung segment anatomy is poor among our medical students. Both traditional and 3D-printed teaching was shown effective. The contribution of 3D printed models would probably improve anatomy teaching among medical students. The introduction of this technology is instinctive and easy to use for both students and teachers. Furthermore, this technique was not particularly expensive to set up.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-025-00272-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The knowledge and understanding of the anatomy of lung segments is of great importance while segmentectomies are increasingly performed. To introduce new technologies and tools in anatomy teaching could help students to improve their skills.

Methods: Students participants (n = 16) were divided into 3 groups: traditional (n = 5), 3D visualization (n = 5) and 3D printing group (n = 6). Each student took a pre- and post-test exam. The traditional teaching group had lessons using 2D anatomical drawings, the 3D visualization group had lessons using a dedicated software allowing anatomical 3D reconstructions and the 3D printing group had lessons using 3D printed anatomical models.

Results: Students of the whole cohort had significant better scores at the post test (mean score = 14.2) compared to the pretest (mean score = 7.9) (p = 0.0011). In the traditional and 3D printing groups, students had significant better scores in the post-test (mean scores = 17.7 and 14.2 respectively) than in the pre-test (mean scores = 8.2 and 7.5; p = 0.0247 and p = 0.0003 respectively). There was no significant difference between the pre and post-test scores for the 3D visualization group (mean score = 8.2 and 11.7 respectively) (p = 0.4347).

Conclusions: The knowledge of lung segment anatomy is poor among our medical students. Both traditional and 3D-printed teaching was shown effective. The contribution of 3D printed models would probably improve anatomy teaching among medical students. The introduction of this technology is instinctive and easy to use for both students and teachers. Furthermore, this technique was not particularly expensive to set up.

三维可视化打印技术在肺段解剖教学中的应用。
背景:在肺节段切除术越来越多的情况下,对肺节段解剖学的认识和理解是非常重要的。在解剖学教学中引入新的技术和工具,有助于提高学生的技能。方法:将16名学生分为传统组(n = 5)、3D可视化组(n = 5)和3D打印组(n = 6)。每个学生都参加了考试前和考试后的考试。传统教学组使用2D解剖图进行教学,3D可视化组使用专用软件进行解剖3D重建,3D打印组使用3D打印解剖模型进行教学。结果:整个队列的学生在测试后得分(平均得分= 14.2)显著高于测试前得分(平均得分= 7.9)(p = 0.0011)。传统组和3D打印组学生的后测得分(平均得分分别为17.7和14.2)显著高于前测得分(平均得分分别为8.2和7.5);P = 0.0247, P = 0.0003)。三维可视化组的测试前后评分差异无统计学意义(平均评分分别为8.2分和11.7分)(p = 0.4347)。结论:我院医学生对肺段解剖学的认识较差。传统教学和3d打印教学均有效。3D打印模型的贡献可能会改善医科学生的解剖学教学。这项技术的引入是本能的,对学生和老师来说都很容易使用。此外,这种技术的设置成本也不是特别高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信