Tinnitus Measured in Everyday Life: A Literature Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Milena Engelke, Sebastian Müller, Berthold Langguth, Rüdiger Pryss, Winfried Schlee
{"title":"Tinnitus Measured in Everyday Life: A Literature Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies.","authors":"Milena Engelke, Sebastian Müller, Berthold Langguth, Rüdiger Pryss, Winfried Schlee","doi":"10.1007/s10162-025-00995-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tinnitus, a common auditory phenomenon, often presents with considerable between-person heterogeneity and within-person fluctuations. To understand the pathophysiological mechanisms and advance patient-centred care, it is essential to recognise these variations. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is a (close-to) real-time data collection method that offers insights into short- and long-term fluctuations of subjective symptoms and their interaction with psychological, environmental, and physiological factors. EMA applied in tinnitus research has shown promise in capturing the nuances of tinnitus experience in naturalistic settings, minimizing recall bias inherent in traditional retrospective methods. This narrative literature review aims to provide a comprehensive up-to-date picture of EMA in tinnitus research by describing previous and current applications, summarising scientific findings, and identifying research gaps by drawing lessons from adjacent mental health fields. 28 publications were identified and assigned to six different topics based on thematic and methodological matters. We highlight contributions of EMA methodology for tinnitus research such as findings on momentary and longitudinal symptom interactions, circadian rhythms, individual differences in symptom patterns and its contributions to treatment evaluation. Emerging technologies, including machine learning, are opening new avenues for personalised tinnitus understanding and management. Despite promising advances, challenges such as data reliability, participant compliance, and integration with sensor-based passive data collection remain areas for further exploration. Drawing lessons from adjacent mental health fields, we propose future directions for EMA in tinnitus research, emphasizing the integration of multimodal data, advanced analytics, and ecological validity to enhance the understanding and management of chronic tinnitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-025-00995-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tinnitus, a common auditory phenomenon, often presents with considerable between-person heterogeneity and within-person fluctuations. To understand the pathophysiological mechanisms and advance patient-centred care, it is essential to recognise these variations. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is a (close-to) real-time data collection method that offers insights into short- and long-term fluctuations of subjective symptoms and their interaction with psychological, environmental, and physiological factors. EMA applied in tinnitus research has shown promise in capturing the nuances of tinnitus experience in naturalistic settings, minimizing recall bias inherent in traditional retrospective methods. This narrative literature review aims to provide a comprehensive up-to-date picture of EMA in tinnitus research by describing previous and current applications, summarising scientific findings, and identifying research gaps by drawing lessons from adjacent mental health fields. 28 publications were identified and assigned to six different topics based on thematic and methodological matters. We highlight contributions of EMA methodology for tinnitus research such as findings on momentary and longitudinal symptom interactions, circadian rhythms, individual differences in symptom patterns and its contributions to treatment evaluation. Emerging technologies, including machine learning, are opening new avenues for personalised tinnitus understanding and management. Despite promising advances, challenges such as data reliability, participant compliance, and integration with sensor-based passive data collection remain areas for further exploration. Drawing lessons from adjacent mental health fields, we propose future directions for EMA in tinnitus research, emphasizing the integration of multimodal data, advanced analytics, and ecological validity to enhance the understanding and management of chronic tinnitus.

日常生活中耳鸣的测量:生态瞬时评价研究的文献综述。
耳鸣是一种常见的听觉现象,经常表现出相当大的人与人之间的异质性和人与人之间的波动。为了理解病理生理机制和推进以患者为中心的护理,认识到这些变化是必不可少的。生态瞬时评估(EMA)是一种(接近)实时的数据收集方法,可以深入了解主观症状的短期和长期波动及其与心理、环境和生理因素的相互作用。EMA在耳鸣研究中的应用表明,它可以在自然环境中捕捉耳鸣体验的细微差别,最大限度地减少传统回顾性方法固有的回忆偏差。这篇叙述性文献综述的目的是通过描述以前和现在的应用,总结科学发现,并通过从邻近的精神卫生领域吸取教训来确定研究空白,提供耳鸣研究中EMA的全面最新情况。根据主题和方法事项,确定并分配了28份出版物,涉及6个不同的专题。我们强调了EMA方法对耳鸣研究的贡献,如暂时性和纵向症状相互作用、昼夜节律、症状模式的个体差异及其对治疗评估的贡献。包括机器学习在内的新兴技术正在为个性化耳鸣的理解和管理开辟新的途径。尽管取得了可喜的进展,但数据可靠性、参与者合规性以及与基于传感器的被动数据收集的集成等挑战仍有待进一步探索。借鉴邻近心理健康领域的经验,我们提出了EMA在耳鸣研究中的未来发展方向,强调多模态数据的整合、高级分析和生态有效性,以提高对慢性耳鸣的认识和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信