Organizational Accountability for Justice and Health Equity.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Jenna Wright, Ellie Tumbuan, Marjorie Stamper-Kurn, Marshall H Chin
{"title":"Organizational Accountability for Justice and Health Equity.","authors":"Jenna Wright, Ellie Tumbuan, Marjorie Stamper-Kurn, Marshall H Chin","doi":"10.1353/pbm.2025.a962019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health-care organizations traditionally view accountability through punitive and performance-metric lenses, failing to address their responsibility to communities most impacted by health inequities. While research exists on organizational accountability in health care, little explores how Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) frameworks might transform health-care delivery toward justice and equity. This article examines how four BIPOC philosophical frameworks-right relations, Seven Generations, calling in versus calling out, and Emergent Strategy-can reimagine organizational accountability to advance health equity. The authors' findings reveal that combining BIPOC accountability frameworks with structural reforms in payment and care delivery systems enables health-care organizations to center relationship-building and long-term community impact. Concrete organizational examples demonstrate successful implementation of these principles through initiatives like the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Advancing Health Equity program, while personal narratives illustrate their transformative potential in patient care. This work provides practical pathways for health-care organizations to move beyond punishment toward accountability models that prioritize immediate holistic care needs, health equity, and generational community well-being, fostering healing and justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54627,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","volume":"68 2","pages":"209-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2025.a962019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health-care organizations traditionally view accountability through punitive and performance-metric lenses, failing to address their responsibility to communities most impacted by health inequities. While research exists on organizational accountability in health care, little explores how Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) frameworks might transform health-care delivery toward justice and equity. This article examines how four BIPOC philosophical frameworks-right relations, Seven Generations, calling in versus calling out, and Emergent Strategy-can reimagine organizational accountability to advance health equity. The authors' findings reveal that combining BIPOC accountability frameworks with structural reforms in payment and care delivery systems enables health-care organizations to center relationship-building and long-term community impact. Concrete organizational examples demonstrate successful implementation of these principles through initiatives like the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Advancing Health Equity program, while personal narratives illustrate their transformative potential in patient care. This work provides practical pathways for health-care organizations to move beyond punishment toward accountability models that prioritize immediate holistic care needs, health equity, and generational community well-being, fostering healing and justice.

司法和卫生公平的组织问责制。
卫生保健组织传统上通过惩罚性和绩效指标来看待问责制,未能解决其对受卫生不平等影响最严重的社区的责任。虽然有关于卫生保健组织问责制的研究,但很少探讨黑人、土著和有色人种(BIPOC)框架如何将卫生保健服务转向公正和公平。本文探讨了四种BIPOC哲学框架——权利关系、七代人、号召与号召以及应急战略——如何重新构想组织问责制,以促进卫生公平。作者的研究结果表明,将BIPOC问责框架与支付和医疗服务系统的结构性改革相结合,可以使卫生保健组织以建立关系和长期社区影响为中心。具体的组织实例通过罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会推进健康公平项目等举措展示了这些原则的成功实施,而个人叙述则说明了它们在患者护理方面的变革潜力。这项工作为卫生保健组织从惩罚转向问责模式提供了切实可行的途径,这种模式优先考虑即时的整体护理需求、卫生公平和代际社区福祉,促进康复和正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, an interdisciplinary scholarly journal whose readers include biologists, physicians, students, and scholars, publishes essays that place important biological or medical subjects in broader scientific, social, or humanistic contexts. These essays span a wide range of subjects, from biomedical topics such as neurobiology, genetics, and evolution, to topics in ethics, history, philosophy, and medical education and practice. The editors encourage an informal style that has literary merit and that preserves the warmth, excitement, and color of the biological and medical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信