Margin, Mission, and the Sociology of Profession: a conversation.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Frederic W Hafferty, Lauren Taylor
{"title":"Margin, Mission, and the Sociology of Profession: a conversation.","authors":"Frederic W Hafferty, Lauren Taylor","doi":"10.1353/pbm.2025.a962026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospitals and health systems have become prime movers in US health care, employing more than 77% of the physician workforce and growing in scale through persistent market consolidation (Muoio 2024). These entities' business practices have recently come under sharp scrutiny for appearing to run contrary to some of the more idealistic norms of medicine. While the law is a valuable tool in discouraging and punishing bad organizational behavior, it frequently struggles to keep pace with a changing marketplace. What ethical concepts, if any, can provide a check or constraint on their behavior? Sociologist Fred Hafferty, one of the leading scholars of professionalism in medicine, explores these and other questions in conversation with ethicist and management scholar Lauren Taylor.</p>","PeriodicalId":54627,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","volume":"68 2","pages":"314-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2025.a962026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospitals and health systems have become prime movers in US health care, employing more than 77% of the physician workforce and growing in scale through persistent market consolidation (Muoio 2024). These entities' business practices have recently come under sharp scrutiny for appearing to run contrary to some of the more idealistic norms of medicine. While the law is a valuable tool in discouraging and punishing bad organizational behavior, it frequently struggles to keep pace with a changing marketplace. What ethical concepts, if any, can provide a check or constraint on their behavior? Sociologist Fred Hafferty, one of the leading scholars of professionalism in medicine, explores these and other questions in conversation with ethicist and management scholar Lauren Taylor.

边际、使命与职业社会学:一次对话。
医院和卫生系统已成为美国医疗保健的主要推动者,雇用了77%以上的医生劳动力,并通过持续的市场整合不断扩大规模(Muoio 2024)。这些实体的商业行为最近受到严格审查,因为它们似乎与一些更理想的医学规范背道而驰。虽然法律在阻止和惩罚不良组织行为方面是一个有价值的工具,但它经常难以跟上不断变化的市场。什么样的道德观念,如果有的话,可以对他们的行为提供检查或约束?社会学家弗雷德·哈弗蒂(Fred Hafferty)是医学专业领域的主要学者之一,他在与伦理学家和管理学学者劳伦·泰勒(Lauren Taylor)的对话中探讨了这些问题和其他问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, an interdisciplinary scholarly journal whose readers include biologists, physicians, students, and scholars, publishes essays that place important biological or medical subjects in broader scientific, social, or humanistic contexts. These essays span a wide range of subjects, from biomedical topics such as neurobiology, genetics, and evolution, to topics in ethics, history, philosophy, and medical education and practice. The editors encourage an informal style that has literary merit and that preserves the warmth, excitement, and color of the biological and medical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信