Health Equity as Mission and Source of Moral Distress: examining health systems actions through a conflict of interest lens.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Katherine R Peeler, Emily B Rubin
{"title":"Health Equity as Mission and Source of Moral Distress: examining health systems actions through a conflict of interest lens.","authors":"Katherine R Peeler, Emily B Rubin","doi":"10.1353/pbm.2025.a962021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, health systems throughout the United States have made public declarations committing to health equity. Yet clinicians in these systems often feel they are not set up to support equitable care. This discrepancy between proclaimed commitments and on-the-ground realities is one of the major reasons for the continued rise in clinician moral distress. Hospitals' mission statements are often multifaceted. Therefore, when one facet, such as research or education, is prioritized, another, such as health equity, may suffer. Do these represent conflicts of interests? Ethical dilemmas? What about the fiduciary responsibilities of a health system? How do those come into play when a hospital is deciding which aspects of its mission to prioritize? This article discusses hospital missions, values, and fiduciary responsibilities; characterizes the nature of the conflicts that arise when key aspects of these commitments and responsibilities are at odds; and offers hospitals and health systems insights for characterizing these conflicts when they arise. By assisting health systems to communicate better with their staff, the authors hope to propel systems further towards achieving health equity and concurrently decrease clinician moral distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":54627,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","volume":"68 2","pages":"243-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2025.a962021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, health systems throughout the United States have made public declarations committing to health equity. Yet clinicians in these systems often feel they are not set up to support equitable care. This discrepancy between proclaimed commitments and on-the-ground realities is one of the major reasons for the continued rise in clinician moral distress. Hospitals' mission statements are often multifaceted. Therefore, when one facet, such as research or education, is prioritized, another, such as health equity, may suffer. Do these represent conflicts of interests? Ethical dilemmas? What about the fiduciary responsibilities of a health system? How do those come into play when a hospital is deciding which aspects of its mission to prioritize? This article discusses hospital missions, values, and fiduciary responsibilities; characterizes the nature of the conflicts that arise when key aspects of these commitments and responsibilities are at odds; and offers hospitals and health systems insights for characterizing these conflicts when they arise. By assisting health systems to communicate better with their staff, the authors hope to propel systems further towards achieving health equity and concurrently decrease clinician moral distress.

卫生公平作为使命和道德困境的根源:从利益冲突的角度审视卫生系统的行动。
近年来,美国各地的卫生系统都公开宣布致力于卫生公平。然而,这些系统中的临床医生常常觉得,他们的设置并不是为了支持公平护理。这种宣称的承诺与实际情况之间的差异是临床医生道德困扰持续上升的主要原因之一。医院的使命宣言往往是多方面的。因此,当一个方面(如研究或教育)被优先考虑时,另一个方面(如卫生公平)可能会受到影响。这些代表利益冲突吗?道德困境?那么卫生系统的受托责任呢?当医院决定优先考虑其任务的哪些方面时,这些因素是如何发挥作用的?本文讨论了医院的使命、价值观和受托责任;描述当这些承诺和责任的关键方面不一致时产生的冲突的性质;并为医院和卫生系统提供见解,以便在这些冲突发生时描述其特征。通过帮助卫生系统更好地与其工作人员沟通,作者希望推动系统进一步实现卫生公平,同时减少临床医生的道德困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, an interdisciplinary scholarly journal whose readers include biologists, physicians, students, and scholars, publishes essays that place important biological or medical subjects in broader scientific, social, or humanistic contexts. These essays span a wide range of subjects, from biomedical topics such as neurobiology, genetics, and evolution, to topics in ethics, history, philosophy, and medical education and practice. The editors encourage an informal style that has literary merit and that preserves the warmth, excitement, and color of the biological and medical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信