Preparing Medical Students and Physicians to Cope With Their Medical Errors: A Scoping Review.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Julia Harrison, Chee Yan Ting, Michelle Leech, Elizabeth Molloy, Margaret Bearman
{"title":"Preparing Medical Students and Physicians to Cope With Their Medical Errors: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Julia Harrison, Chee Yan Ting, Michelle Leech, Elizabeth Molloy, Margaret Bearman","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many clinicians will experience feeling responsible for inadvertently harming a patient through medical error. These situations can be distressing, difficult to navigate, and career altering. In addition to aftermath support, there is a recognized need for preemptive education to better prepare clinicians to cope after such events. Little published guidance exists about how best to do this. This scoping review explores the current knowledge about educational programs and strategies to prepare medical students and physicians to cope effectively with their own medical errors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Three online databases, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus, were searched on January 3, 2025, for articles published from database inception to the search date that described programs designed to prepare medical students and/or physicians to cope better with personal involvement in patient harm from medical error. Eligibility screening and data recording were independently performed by 2 reviewers. Simple data were summarized and common pedagogical strategies were identified by inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 5,359 unique articles for screening, of which 97 full-text articles were retrieved. Twelve articles met the eligibility criteria. The study interventions vary in structure and delivery methods but share similar rationale, key messages, and pedagogical strategies. Dominant pedagogical strategies were divided into 2 groups: (1) what students need to learn about coping after medical error (attend to emotions, universality of fallibility, helpful and unhelpful paths for coping, workplace culture, care for colleagues, transferal of learning to the workplace) and (2) ways to support students in this learning (actual cases, psychological safety and honest conversation, role-modeling, reflection and learning from others' experience).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A constellation of pedagogical strategies synthesized from the literature provides program design ideas for education that targets the development of learners' capacity to cope with involvement in patient harm from medical error.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many clinicians will experience feeling responsible for inadvertently harming a patient through medical error. These situations can be distressing, difficult to navigate, and career altering. In addition to aftermath support, there is a recognized need for preemptive education to better prepare clinicians to cope after such events. Little published guidance exists about how best to do this. This scoping review explores the current knowledge about educational programs and strategies to prepare medical students and physicians to cope effectively with their own medical errors.

Method: Three online databases, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus, were searched on January 3, 2025, for articles published from database inception to the search date that described programs designed to prepare medical students and/or physicians to cope better with personal involvement in patient harm from medical error. Eligibility screening and data recording were independently performed by 2 reviewers. Simple data were summarized and common pedagogical strategies were identified by inductive thematic analysis.

Results: The search yielded 5,359 unique articles for screening, of which 97 full-text articles were retrieved. Twelve articles met the eligibility criteria. The study interventions vary in structure and delivery methods but share similar rationale, key messages, and pedagogical strategies. Dominant pedagogical strategies were divided into 2 groups: (1) what students need to learn about coping after medical error (attend to emotions, universality of fallibility, helpful and unhelpful paths for coping, workplace culture, care for colleagues, transferal of learning to the workplace) and (2) ways to support students in this learning (actual cases, psychological safety and honest conversation, role-modeling, reflection and learning from others' experience).

Conclusions: A constellation of pedagogical strategies synthesized from the literature provides program design ideas for education that targets the development of learners' capacity to cope with involvement in patient harm from medical error.

准备医学生和医生应对他们的医疗错误:范围审查。
目的:许多临床医生会因为医疗失误而对病人造成无意的伤害。这些情况会让人痛苦,难以驾驭,甚至会改变你的职业。除了事后支持外,人们还认识到需要进行先发制人的教育,以使临床医生更好地做好应对此类事件的准备。关于如何最好地做到这一点,几乎没有公开的指导意见。这一范围审查探讨了当前的知识教育计划和策略,以准备医学生和医生有效地应对自己的医疗错误。方法:对MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Scopus这三个在线数据库于2025年1月3日进行检索,检索从数据库建立到检索日期发表的文章,这些文章描述了旨在帮助医学生和/或医生更好地应对医疗差错对患者造成伤害的个人参与的项目。资格筛选和数据记录由2名审稿人独立完成。通过归纳性专题分析,总结了简单的数据,并确定了常见的教学策略。结果:检索得到5359篇独特的筛选文章,其中检索到97篇全文文章。12篇文章符合入选标准。研究干预在结构和提供方法上有所不同,但具有相似的基本原理、关键信息和教学策略。主要教学策略分为两组:(1)学生应对医疗事故需要学习的内容(关注情绪、易犯错误的普遍性、应对的有益和无用途径、职场文化、关心同事、学习转移到工作场所)和(2)支持学生应对医疗事故的方法(实际案例、心理安全和诚实对话、角色塑造、反思和借鉴他人经验)。结论:从文献中合成的一系列教学策略为教育提供了方案设计思路,目标是培养学习者应对医疗差错对患者伤害的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信