Charalambos C Charalambous, Eric R Espinoza-Wade, Guilherme M Cesar, Michaela Gerger, Yi-Hsuan Lai, Carolee J Winstein
{"title":"Quantification of Goal-Directed Stepping Behavior Under Two Limb Choice Conditions in Neurotypical Adults: A Preliminary Investigation.","authors":"Charalambos C Charalambous, Eric R Espinoza-Wade, Guilherme M Cesar, Michaela Gerger, Yi-Hsuan Lai, Carolee J Winstein","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2025.2514474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During reaching, arm choice depends on handedness, success, and effort; however, whether these factors influence leg choice for goal-directed stepping is still unknown. We aimed to quantify the kinematics and behavioral patterns of leg choice and to explore whether success and/or effort influence leg choice during goal-directed stepping under two <i>Choice</i> conditions in 20 right-leg dominant neurotypical adults. We adapted the classic center-out target array; participants stepped to pre-cued targets with an emphasis on accuracy without time constraints. The first set of trials was always <i>Free</i> for which either leg could be chosen. The second set of trials was verbally <i>Constrained</i> for which there was no choice as only the left non-dominant leg was to be used. We separately compared success, effort, and subjective difficulty between <i>Free</i> and <i>Constrained</i> trials for left and right target regions. In <i>Free</i>, participants uniformly selected the limb ipsilateral to the target. While success and subjective difficulty were not influenced by <i>Choice</i>, effort varied depending on <i>Choice.</i> Our preliminary findings suggest that during goal-directed stepping, leg choice depends on effort and may be independent of leg dominance and subjective difficulty, while the difficulty of the <i>Constrained Choice</i> condition can improve success independent of leg used.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2514474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During reaching, arm choice depends on handedness, success, and effort; however, whether these factors influence leg choice for goal-directed stepping is still unknown. We aimed to quantify the kinematics and behavioral patterns of leg choice and to explore whether success and/or effort influence leg choice during goal-directed stepping under two Choice conditions in 20 right-leg dominant neurotypical adults. We adapted the classic center-out target array; participants stepped to pre-cued targets with an emphasis on accuracy without time constraints. The first set of trials was always Free for which either leg could be chosen. The second set of trials was verbally Constrained for which there was no choice as only the left non-dominant leg was to be used. We separately compared success, effort, and subjective difficulty between Free and Constrained trials for left and right target regions. In Free, participants uniformly selected the limb ipsilateral to the target. While success and subjective difficulty were not influenced by Choice, effort varied depending on Choice. Our preliminary findings suggest that during goal-directed stepping, leg choice depends on effort and may be independent of leg dominance and subjective difficulty, while the difficulty of the Constrained Choice condition can improve success independent of leg used.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.