Quantification of Goal-Directed Stepping Behavior Under Two Limb Choice Conditions in Neurotypical Adults: A Preliminary Investigation.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Charalambos C Charalambous, Eric R Espinoza-Wade, Guilherme M Cesar, Michaela Gerger, Yi-Hsuan Lai, Carolee J Winstein
{"title":"Quantification of Goal-Directed Stepping Behavior Under Two Limb Choice Conditions in Neurotypical Adults: A Preliminary Investigation.","authors":"Charalambos C Charalambous, Eric R Espinoza-Wade, Guilherme M Cesar, Michaela Gerger, Yi-Hsuan Lai, Carolee J Winstein","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2025.2514474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During reaching, arm choice depends on handedness, success, and effort; however, whether these factors influence leg choice for goal-directed stepping is still unknown. We aimed to quantify the kinematics and behavioral patterns of leg choice and to explore whether success and/or effort influence leg choice during goal-directed stepping under two <i>Choice</i> conditions in 20 right-leg dominant neurotypical adults. We adapted the classic center-out target array; participants stepped to pre-cued targets with an emphasis on accuracy without time constraints. The first set of trials was always <i>Free</i> for which either leg could be chosen. The second set of trials was verbally <i>Constrained</i> for which there was no choice as only the left non-dominant leg was to be used. We separately compared success, effort, and subjective difficulty between <i>Free</i> and <i>Constrained</i> trials for left and right target regions. In <i>Free</i>, participants uniformly selected the limb ipsilateral to the target. While success and subjective difficulty were not influenced by <i>Choice</i>, effort varied depending on <i>Choice.</i> Our preliminary findings suggest that during goal-directed stepping, leg choice depends on effort and may be independent of leg dominance and subjective difficulty, while the difficulty of the <i>Constrained Choice</i> condition can improve success independent of leg used.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2514474","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During reaching, arm choice depends on handedness, success, and effort; however, whether these factors influence leg choice for goal-directed stepping is still unknown. We aimed to quantify the kinematics and behavioral patterns of leg choice and to explore whether success and/or effort influence leg choice during goal-directed stepping under two Choice conditions in 20 right-leg dominant neurotypical adults. We adapted the classic center-out target array; participants stepped to pre-cued targets with an emphasis on accuracy without time constraints. The first set of trials was always Free for which either leg could be chosen. The second set of trials was verbally Constrained for which there was no choice as only the left non-dominant leg was to be used. We separately compared success, effort, and subjective difficulty between Free and Constrained trials for left and right target regions. In Free, participants uniformly selected the limb ipsilateral to the target. While success and subjective difficulty were not influenced by Choice, effort varied depending on Choice. Our preliminary findings suggest that during goal-directed stepping, leg choice depends on effort and may be independent of leg dominance and subjective difficulty, while the difficulty of the Constrained Choice condition can improve success independent of leg used.

神经正常成人两种肢体选择条件下目标定向行走行为的量化:初步研究。
在伸手的过程中,手臂的选择取决于惯用手、成功和努力;然而,这些因素是否会影响目标定向步进的腿的选择仍然是未知的。我们的目的是量化腿选择的运动学和行为模式,并探讨在两种选择条件下,成功和/或努力是否会影响20名右腿优势型神经典型成年人在目标导向步中的腿选择。我们采用了经典的中心向外的目标阵列;参与者在没有时间限制的情况下向预先提示的目标迈进,强调准确性。第一组试验总是自由的,可以选择任何一条腿。第二组试验是口头限制,没有选择,因为只有左非优势腿被使用。我们分别比较了左右目标区域自由试验和约束试验的成功、努力和主观难度。在自由实验中,参与者一致选择与目标同侧的肢体。虽然成功和主观难度不受选择的影响,但努力程度取决于选择。我们的初步研究结果表明,在目标导向的步进中,腿的选择取决于努力程度,并且可能独立于腿的优势和主观难度,而约束选择条件的难度可以独立于腿的使用来提高成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信