Impact of dual antiplatelet therapy duration on long-term outcomes following chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yao Jiang, Han Zhang, Chujie Zhang, Yingyang Geng, Yin Zhang, Changdong Guan, Kefei Dou, Yuejin Yang, Shubin Qiao, Yongjian Wu, Lei Song
{"title":"Impact of dual antiplatelet therapy duration on long-term outcomes following chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Yao Jiang, Han Zhang, Chujie Zhang, Yingyang Geng, Yin Zhang, Changdong Guan, Kefei Dou, Yuejin Yang, Shubin Qiao, Yongjian Wu, Lei Song","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.05.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration after percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion remains unclear. Thus, we aim to determine the optimal DAPT duration in this high-risk cohort with complex anatomy and procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2010 and December 2013, 2659 consecutive chronic total occlusion patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at Fu Wai Hospital were enrolled, and those without adverse events within 12 months were categorized into long (>12 months) or short-term (≤12 months) groups according to DAPT duration. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death and spontaneous myocardial infarction at 5 years. The safety endpoint was the rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3 or 5 type bleeding at 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1923 patients were included in the final analysis, of which 1104 (57.4%) continued DAPT beyond 12 months. Compared with short-term DAPT, long-term DAPT was associated with a lower rate of primary outcome (3.6% vs. 6.3%; adjusted hazard ratio[aHR]: 0.58 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.89], p=0.01), primarily driven by fewer cardiac death (0.1% vs. 4.0%, aHR:0.02 [95% CI, 0.00 to 0.17]; p<0.001); and a higher risk of BARC 2-5 bleeding (3.8% vs. 1.5%; aHR: 2.61 [95% CI, 1.37 to 4.97], p<0.01), whereas the risk of BARC 3 or greater was comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention, prolonged DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction, but with an increased risk of minor bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.05.038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration after percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary chronic total occlusion remains unclear. Thus, we aim to determine the optimal DAPT duration in this high-risk cohort with complex anatomy and procedures.

Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2013, 2659 consecutive chronic total occlusion patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention at Fu Wai Hospital were enrolled, and those without adverse events within 12 months were categorized into long (>12 months) or short-term (≤12 months) groups according to DAPT duration. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death and spontaneous myocardial infarction at 5 years. The safety endpoint was the rate of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3 or 5 type bleeding at 5 years.

Results: Overall, 1923 patients were included in the final analysis, of which 1104 (57.4%) continued DAPT beyond 12 months. Compared with short-term DAPT, long-term DAPT was associated with a lower rate of primary outcome (3.6% vs. 6.3%; adjusted hazard ratio[aHR]: 0.58 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.89], p=0.01), primarily driven by fewer cardiac death (0.1% vs. 4.0%, aHR:0.02 [95% CI, 0.00 to 0.17]; p<0.001); and a higher risk of BARC 2-5 bleeding (3.8% vs. 1.5%; aHR: 2.61 [95% CI, 1.37 to 4.97], p<0.01), whereas the risk of BARC 3 or greater was comparable between groups.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention, prolonged DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction, but with an increased risk of minor bleeding.

双重抗血小板治疗持续时间对慢性全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期预后的影响。
背景:慢性冠脉全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的最佳持续时间尚不清楚。因此,我们的目标是确定具有复杂解剖结构和手术的高危队列的最佳DAPT持续时间。方法:选取2010年1月~ 2013年12月阜外医院经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的慢性全闭塞患者2659例,将12个月内无不良事件的患者按DAPT持续时间分为长期组(0 ~ 12个月)和短期组(≤12个月)。主要终点是5年时心源性死亡和自发性心肌梗死的复合。安全性终点是5年出血学术研究联盟(BARC) 2、3或5型出血的发生率。结果:总的来说,1923例患者纳入最终分析,其中1104例(57.4%)持续DAPT超过12个月。与短期DAPT相比,长期DAPT的主要结局发生率较低(3.6% vs. 6.3%;校正危险比[aHR]: 0.58 [95% CI, 0.38至0.89],p=0.01),主要是由于心脏死亡减少(0.1%对4.0%,aHR:0.02 [95% CI, 0.00至0.17];结论:在接受慢性全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,延长DAPT与心源性死亡和心肌梗死风险降低相关,但与轻微出血风险增加相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信