Effect of oral academic narrative language intervention on listening comprehension and generalised word learning: A proof of concept study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Trina D Spencer, Megan S Kirby, Chelsey Gardner, Douglas B Petersen
{"title":"Effect of oral academic narrative language intervention on listening comprehension and generalised word learning: A proof of concept study.","authors":"Trina D Spencer, Megan S Kirby, Chelsey Gardner, Douglas B Petersen","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2025.2510235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Science of reading experts have called for increased attention on oral academic language. Interventions need to integrate multiple dimensions of academic language and word learning strategies to impact broader academic repertoires. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to examine the effect of an oral academic narrative language intervention, with embedded vocabulary instruction, on listening comprehension and generalised word learning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-two first graders at risk for language-based comprehension difficulties were randomly assigned to two groups. Research assistants delivered four 30 min, small group, academic language intervention sessions to the treatment group every week for 12 weeks. Control group students received their typical small group literacy interventions from classroom teachers. At pre-and post-test, first graders' narrative listening comprehension and ability to infer the meaning of words from story context were assessed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>From pre- to post-test, students in the treatment group outperformed students in the control group on both the narrative retell (<i>p</i> = .0001) and vocabulary (<i>p</i> = .029) measures, with large effects (<i>d</i> = 1.54 and 1.18, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vocabulary instruction embedded in narrative intervention can improve young students' ability to learn novel word meanings from context and listening comprehension skills. As a promising approach to integrating multiple aspects of oral academic language, further refinement and extensions are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2025.2510235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Science of reading experts have called for increased attention on oral academic language. Interventions need to integrate multiple dimensions of academic language and word learning strategies to impact broader academic repertoires. The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to examine the effect of an oral academic narrative language intervention, with embedded vocabulary instruction, on listening comprehension and generalised word learning.

Method: Twenty-two first graders at risk for language-based comprehension difficulties were randomly assigned to two groups. Research assistants delivered four 30 min, small group, academic language intervention sessions to the treatment group every week for 12 weeks. Control group students received their typical small group literacy interventions from classroom teachers. At pre-and post-test, first graders' narrative listening comprehension and ability to infer the meaning of words from story context were assessed.

Result: From pre- to post-test, students in the treatment group outperformed students in the control group on both the narrative retell (p = .0001) and vocabulary (p = .029) measures, with large effects (d = 1.54 and 1.18, respectively).

Conclusion: Vocabulary instruction embedded in narrative intervention can improve young students' ability to learn novel word meanings from context and listening comprehension skills. As a promising approach to integrating multiple aspects of oral academic language, further refinement and extensions are recommended.

口头学术叙事语言干预对听力理解和泛化词汇学习的影响:概念验证研究。
目的:阅读科学专家呼吁增加对口头学术语言的关注。干预措施需要整合学术语言和单词学习策略的多个维度,以影响更广泛的学术知识库。这个概念验证研究的目的是检验口头学术叙事语言干预,嵌入词汇教学,对听力理解和泛化单词学习的影响。方法:将22名有语言理解困难风险的一年级学生随机分为两组。研究助理每周为实验组提供四次30分钟的小组学术语言干预课程,持续12周。控制组学生接受课堂老师的典型小组扫盲干预。在测试前和测试后,评估一年级学生的叙事听力理解能力和从故事语境中推断单词意义的能力。结果:从测试前到测试后,实验组学生在叙事复述(p = 0.0001)和词汇量(p = 0.029)两项指标上均优于对照组学生,且效果显著(d = 1.54和1.18)。结论:在叙事干预中嵌入词汇教学可以提高青少年学生从语境中学习新词义的能力和听力理解能力。作为一种整合口头学术语言多个方面的有前途的方法,建议进一步完善和扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信