Surgical intervention yields superior results over conservative management in calcaneal-side calcaneofibular ligament rupture.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jin Su Kim, Chul Hyun Park
{"title":"Surgical intervention yields superior results over conservative management in calcaneal-side calcaneofibular ligament rupture.","authors":"Jin Su Kim, Chul Hyun Park","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2025.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated complete calcaneal-side calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) rupture. This study was performed to compare the clinical and radiographic results of conservative and surgical treatments for acute ankle sprains with complete calcaneal-side CFL rupture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 36 patients diagnosed with acute ankle sprain and complete calcaneal-side CFL rupture. The first 14 patients were treated conservatively (group C), and the remaining 22 underwent surgery (group S). Clinical results between the two groups were compared regarding their scores on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) and patient satisfaction with the treatment. Radiographic results were evaluated for the rupture status of the CFL on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and stability of the ankle joint using a stress radiographs with Telos and manual anterior drawer test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the last follow-up, the mean CAIT score was significantly higher in group S than in group C (P < 0.001). The treatment dissatisfaction rate was significantly higher in group C (P = 0.003). In all cases, the proximal migration distance of the ruptured CFL significantly correlated with the incidence of Stener's-like lesions, in which the distal stump of the CFL was displaced over the peroneal tendons (R=0.721, P < 0.001). Stress radiographs showed no significant difference in postoperative instability between groups. In the manual anterior drawer test at the last follow-up, the proportion of stable ankles was significantly higher in group S than in group C (P = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical treatment could improve clinical results and satisfaction in patients with acute ankle sprains and complete calcaneal-side CFL rupture.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, Retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2025.05.014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated complete calcaneal-side calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) rupture. This study was performed to compare the clinical and radiographic results of conservative and surgical treatments for acute ankle sprains with complete calcaneal-side CFL rupture.

Methods: This study included 36 patients diagnosed with acute ankle sprain and complete calcaneal-side CFL rupture. The first 14 patients were treated conservatively (group C), and the remaining 22 underwent surgery (group S). Clinical results between the two groups were compared regarding their scores on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) and patient satisfaction with the treatment. Radiographic results were evaluated for the rupture status of the CFL on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and stability of the ankle joint using a stress radiographs with Telos and manual anterior drawer test.

Results: At the last follow-up, the mean CAIT score was significantly higher in group S than in group C (P < 0.001). The treatment dissatisfaction rate was significantly higher in group C (P = 0.003). In all cases, the proximal migration distance of the ruptured CFL significantly correlated with the incidence of Stener's-like lesions, in which the distal stump of the CFL was displaced over the peroneal tendons (R=0.721, P < 0.001). Stress radiographs showed no significant difference in postoperative instability between groups. In the manual anterior drawer test at the last follow-up, the proportion of stable ankles was significantly higher in group S than in group C (P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Surgical treatment could improve clinical results and satisfaction in patients with acute ankle sprains and complete calcaneal-side CFL rupture.

Level of evidence: III, Retrospective cohort study.

跟骨侧跟腓骨韧带断裂的手术治疗效果优于保守治疗。
背景:据我们所知,没有研究调查完全跟侧跟腓骨韧带(CFL)断裂。本研究的目的是比较保守治疗和手术治疗急性踝关节扭伤伴跟侧CFL完全破裂的临床和影像学结果。方法:本研究包括36例诊断为急性踝关节扭伤和完全性跟侧CFL断裂的患者。前14例采用保守治疗(C组),其余22例采用手术治疗(S组)。比较两组患者在坎伯兰踝关节不稳定工具(CAIT)上的评分和患者对治疗的满意度。术前磁共振成像评估CFL的破裂状态,并通过应力x线片和手动前抽屉测试评估踝关节的稳定性。结果:末次随访时,S组CAIT评分平均值明显高于C组(P 结论:手术治疗可提高急性踝关节扭伤完全性跟侧CFL断裂患者的临床疗效和满意度。证据等级:III,回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信