'It's Part of the College Experience': A Focus Group Assessment of US College Students' Knowledge and Use of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Matthew Chrisman, Kelsey Gardiner, Andrea Cullers, Allene Gremaud, Candace Rodman
{"title":"'It's Part of the College Experience': A Focus Group Assessment of US College Students' Knowledge and Use of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.","authors":"Matthew Chrisman, Kelsey Gardiner, Andrea Cullers, Allene Gremaud, Candace Rodman","doi":"10.1111/nbu.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>College student food insecurity is highly prevalent, yet qualitative analyses of this problem and potential campus solutions are scarce in the literature. The purpose of this online focus group study was to examine college students' knowledge of food insecurity, including barriers and facilitators of accessing federal food assistance programmes. Students from 13 colleges, universities and tech schools in one Midwestern state were recruited to participate using convenience sampling. Any enrolled student was eligible. A total of 26 students from 9 universities participated in 4 total focus groups (6-8 students per group) which all lasted between 45 and 55 min. The primary outcome was knowledge and use of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Focus groups were held online via Zoom, recorded, then transcribed, reviewed and discussed by all authors until data saturation was achieved. Data were coded based on agreed-upon themes. Participants included 35% males; the average age was 22.9 years, and 13 were from public institutions. Main themes included: challenges of applying for SNAP, including determining eligibility and difficulty applying; a lack of knowledge related to food insecurity and SNAP; the role of campuses in assisting food insecure students; and stigma associated with being food insecure, which was considered part of the college experience. College food insecurity should be addressed, particularly by targeting campus resources, and campus policies could be targeted to reduce food insecurity among students. Potential suggestions include campus administrators assisting in determining eligibility and applying for SNAP. Future work is needed to reduce stigma surrounding food insecurity and SNAP use.</p>","PeriodicalId":48536,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

College student food insecurity is highly prevalent, yet qualitative analyses of this problem and potential campus solutions are scarce in the literature. The purpose of this online focus group study was to examine college students' knowledge of food insecurity, including barriers and facilitators of accessing federal food assistance programmes. Students from 13 colleges, universities and tech schools in one Midwestern state were recruited to participate using convenience sampling. Any enrolled student was eligible. A total of 26 students from 9 universities participated in 4 total focus groups (6-8 students per group) which all lasted between 45 and 55 min. The primary outcome was knowledge and use of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Focus groups were held online via Zoom, recorded, then transcribed, reviewed and discussed by all authors until data saturation was achieved. Data were coded based on agreed-upon themes. Participants included 35% males; the average age was 22.9 years, and 13 were from public institutions. Main themes included: challenges of applying for SNAP, including determining eligibility and difficulty applying; a lack of knowledge related to food insecurity and SNAP; the role of campuses in assisting food insecure students; and stigma associated with being food insecure, which was considered part of the college experience. College food insecurity should be addressed, particularly by targeting campus resources, and campus policies could be targeted to reduce food insecurity among students. Potential suggestions include campus administrators assisting in determining eligibility and applying for SNAP. Future work is needed to reduce stigma surrounding food insecurity and SNAP use.

“这是大学经历的一部分”:对美国大学生补充营养援助计划的知识和使用的焦点小组评估。
大学生食品不安全是非常普遍的,但这一问题的定性分析和潜在的校园解决方案在文献中很少。这项在线焦点小组研究的目的是调查大学生对食品不安全的认识,包括获得联邦食品援助计划的障碍和促进因素。来自中西部一个州的13所学院、大学和技术学校的学生采用方便抽样的方式参与研究。任何注册的学生都有资格。来自9所大学的26名学生参加了4个焦点小组(每组6-8名学生),时间在45 - 55分钟之间。主要结果是补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的知识和使用。焦点小组通过Zoom在线举行,记录,然后由所有作者转录,审查和讨论,直到达到数据饱和。数据是根据商定的主题编码的。参与者包括35%的男性;平均年龄为22.9岁,其中13人来自事业单位。主题包括:申请SNAP的挑战,包括确定资格和申请难度;缺乏与粮食不安全和SNAP有关的知识;校园在帮助没有粮食保障的学生方面的作用;以及与食物不安全有关的耻辱,这被认为是大学经历的一部分。应该解决大学食品不安全问题,特别是通过针对校园资源,校园政策可以有针对性地减少学生的食品不安全。潜在的建议包括校园管理人员协助确定资格和申请SNAP。未来需要开展工作,减少围绕粮食不安全和SNAP使用的污名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition Bulletin
Nutrition Bulletin NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Nutrition Bulletin provides accessible reviews at the cutting edge of research. Read by researchers and nutritionists working in universities and research institutes; public health nutritionists, dieticians and other health professionals; nutritionists, technologists and others in the food industry; those engaged in higher education including students; and journalists with an interest in nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信