Self-concealment predicts use of secrecy and attitude toward secrecy, not subjective ability to keep secrets.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Current Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1007/s12144-025-07738-7
Laura Blomqvist, Ildikó Éva Csizmazia, Ruth Van der Hallen
{"title":"Self-concealment predicts use of secrecy and attitude toward secrecy, not subjective ability to keep secrets.","authors":"Laura Blomqvist, Ildikó Éva Csizmazia, Ruth Van der Hallen","doi":"10.1007/s12144-025-07738-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-concealment and secrecy, although conceptually distinct, are often conflated or inadequately distinguished in existing literature. In this correlational study, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between self-concealment and three dimensions of secrecy: the use of secrecy, the ability to keep secrets, and attitude toward secrecy. The sample consisted of 220 individuals (76% identified as female), between the ages of 18 to 78 (<i>M</i> = 24.27, <i>SD</i> = 8.88). Participants completed an online survey which included the Self-Concealment Scale (SCS), the Common Secrecy Questionnaire (CSQ) and the newly developed Secrecy Ability Scale (SAB) and Secrecy Attitude Scale (SAT). Data were screened to mitigate both positive and negative response biases. The results revealed that high self-concealers tend to keep more secrets and have a more positive attitude toward secrecy compared to low self-concealers. No significant group difference emerged concerning the subjective ability to keep secrets. Limitations and future implications of the findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48075,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychology","volume":"44 10","pages":"9407-9416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144041/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07738-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-concealment and secrecy, although conceptually distinct, are often conflated or inadequately distinguished in existing literature. In this correlational study, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between self-concealment and three dimensions of secrecy: the use of secrecy, the ability to keep secrets, and attitude toward secrecy. The sample consisted of 220 individuals (76% identified as female), between the ages of 18 to 78 (M = 24.27, SD = 8.88). Participants completed an online survey which included the Self-Concealment Scale (SCS), the Common Secrecy Questionnaire (CSQ) and the newly developed Secrecy Ability Scale (SAB) and Secrecy Attitude Scale (SAT). Data were screened to mitigate both positive and negative response biases. The results revealed that high self-concealers tend to keep more secrets and have a more positive attitude toward secrecy compared to low self-concealers. No significant group difference emerged concerning the subjective ability to keep secrets. Limitations and future implications of the findings are discussed.

自我隐藏预示着秘密的使用和对秘密的态度,而不是主观的保守秘密的能力。
自我隐藏和保密虽然在概念上是不同的,但在现有文献中经常被混为一谈或区分不清。本研究旨在探讨自我隐藏与保密行为、保密能力和保密态度三个维度之间的关系。样本包括220名个体(76%为女性),年龄在18至78岁之间(M = 24.27, SD = 8.88)。参与者完成了一项在线调查,包括自我隐藏量表(SCS)、通用保密问卷(CSQ)和新开发的保密能力量表(SAB)和保密态度量表(SAT)。筛选数据以减轻积极和消极反应偏差。结果显示,与低水平的自我隐藏者相比,高水平的自我隐藏者更倾向于保守更多的秘密,对秘密的态度也更积极。在主观保密能力方面,组间差异不显著。讨论了研究结果的局限性和未来意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Psychology
Current Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1412
期刊介绍: Current Psychology is an international forum for rapid dissemination of peer-reviewed research at the cutting edge of psychology. It welcomes significant and rigorous empirical and theoretical contributions from all the major areas of psychology, including but not limited to: cognitive psychology and cognition, social, clinical, health, developmental, methodological, and personality psychology, neuropsychology, psychometrics, human factors, and educational psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信