Comparison of the effect of glove size on comfort, sensitivity and dexterity in the use of double surgical gloves: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Emine Arici Parlak, Neslihan Ilkaz, Hatice Ayhan, Emine Iyigun
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of glove size on comfort, sensitivity and dexterity in the use of double surgical gloves: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Emine Arici Parlak, Neslihan Ilkaz, Hatice Ayhan, Emine Iyigun","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2025.2503580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. This study aimed to compare the effect of wearing double gloves during surgery on the surgical team's dexterity, tactile sensitivity and comfort. <i>Methods</i>. The crossover randomized controlled included 80 surgical team members. Four different procedures were implemented in 320 surgeries: A, own-size glove on the inside and outside; B, own-size glove on the inside and half a size larger outside; C, half a size larger glove on the inside and own-size glove outside; D, single gloves of own size. <i>Results</i>. Mean scores for dexterity, tactile sensitivity and comfort level were higher in Procedure D than in all other procedures (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In double-gloving, mean scores for dexterity, tactile sensitivity and comfort level were higher in Procedures A and B compared to Procedure C (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Perspiration, discomfort and reduced mobility experienced during surgical glove usage were less pronounced using single-layered gloves (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For glove preferences, the first choice was Procedure D (81.3%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). <i>Conclusion</i>. Use of single gloves is more effective for surgical teams in terms of dexterity, tactile sensitivity, comfort and satisfaction. There is no significant difference in effectiveness among double-gloving procedures, but healthcare professionals tend to prefer wearing own-size gloves on the inside and half a size larger outside. Clinical trial registration: NCT06042088.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2025.2503580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. This study aimed to compare the effect of wearing double gloves during surgery on the surgical team's dexterity, tactile sensitivity and comfort. Methods. The crossover randomized controlled included 80 surgical team members. Four different procedures were implemented in 320 surgeries: A, own-size glove on the inside and outside; B, own-size glove on the inside and half a size larger outside; C, half a size larger glove on the inside and own-size glove outside; D, single gloves of own size. Results. Mean scores for dexterity, tactile sensitivity and comfort level were higher in Procedure D than in all other procedures (p < 0.05). In double-gloving, mean scores for dexterity, tactile sensitivity and comfort level were higher in Procedures A and B compared to Procedure C (p < 0.05). Perspiration, discomfort and reduced mobility experienced during surgical glove usage were less pronounced using single-layered gloves (p < 0.05). For glove preferences, the first choice was Procedure D (81.3%; p < 0.05). Conclusion. Use of single gloves is more effective for surgical teams in terms of dexterity, tactile sensitivity, comfort and satisfaction. There is no significant difference in effectiveness among double-gloving procedures, but healthcare professionals tend to prefer wearing own-size gloves on the inside and half a size larger outside. Clinical trial registration: NCT06042088.

手套尺寸对使用双外科手套的舒适性、敏感性和灵活性影响的比较:一项随机对照试验。
目标。本研究旨在比较手术中戴双手套对手术团队的灵巧性、触觉灵敏度和舒适度的影响。方法。交叉随机对照包括80名外科团队成员。在320例手术中实施了四种不同的程序:A,自己大小的手套在内部和外部;B,里面是自己大小的手套,外面是大半码的手套;C、里面戴大半个码的手套,外面戴自己码的手套;D,自己尺寸的单只手套。结果。术中灵巧度、触觉灵敏度和舒适度的平均得分均高于其他手术(p p p p)。在灵巧性、触觉灵敏度、舒适度和满意度方面,使用单只手套对外科团队更有效。在使用双手套的过程中,有效性没有显著差异,但医疗保健专业人员倾向于在里面戴自己尺寸的手套,在外面戴大半个尺寸的手套。临床试验注册:NCT06042088。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信