Using the hierarchy of intervention effectiveness to improve the quality of recommendations developed during critical patient safety incident reviews.

Q3 Medicine
Melissa F Lan, Hilary Weatherby, Elisa Chimonides, Lucas B Chartier, Laura D Pozzobon
{"title":"Using the hierarchy of intervention effectiveness to improve the quality of recommendations developed during critical patient safety incident reviews.","authors":"Melissa F Lan, Hilary Weatherby, Elisa Chimonides, Lucas B Chartier, Laura D Pozzobon","doi":"10.1177/08404704251343260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our Canadian multi-site academic health sciences centre uses a standardized process to review critical patient safety incidents and develop recommendations to prevent incident reoccurrence. We recognized an opportunity to enhance recommendation development by integrating the Hierarchy of Intervention Effectiveness (HIE), a human factors framework, into the incident review process. This project aimed to increase the proportion of system-focused recommendations from critical incident reviews from 16 to 30% over 16 months. A multi-intervention strategy included (1) standardizing the incident analysis review template; (2) earmarking time for recommendation development during reviews; (3) providing participants with just-in-time education and tools; and (4) initiating HIE-based recommendation classification during incident reviews. Statistical process control p-Chart analysis showed an increase in system-focused recommendations from 16 to 30% over 16 months. The HIE promotes system-level change to prevent critical incidents, which other organizations may benefit from incorporating in their patient safety reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"8404704251343260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251343260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our Canadian multi-site academic health sciences centre uses a standardized process to review critical patient safety incidents and develop recommendations to prevent incident reoccurrence. We recognized an opportunity to enhance recommendation development by integrating the Hierarchy of Intervention Effectiveness (HIE), a human factors framework, into the incident review process. This project aimed to increase the proportion of system-focused recommendations from critical incident reviews from 16 to 30% over 16 months. A multi-intervention strategy included (1) standardizing the incident analysis review template; (2) earmarking time for recommendation development during reviews; (3) providing participants with just-in-time education and tools; and (4) initiating HIE-based recommendation classification during incident reviews. Statistical process control p-Chart analysis showed an increase in system-focused recommendations from 16 to 30% over 16 months. The HIE promotes system-level change to prevent critical incidents, which other organizations may benefit from incorporating in their patient safety reviews.

使用干预有效性层次来提高在重症患者安全事件审查期间提出的建议的质量。
我们的加拿大多站点学术卫生科学中心使用标准化流程审查严重的患者安全事件,并制定建议以防止事件再次发生。我们认识到通过将干预有效性层次(HIE)(一个人为因素框架)集成到事件审查过程中来加强建议开发的机会。该项目旨在在16个月内将关键事件审查中以系统为重点的建议的比例从16%提高到30%。多干预策略包括:(1)标准化事件分析评价模板;(2)在评审中指定时间进行推荐开发;(3)为参与者提供及时的教育和工具;(4)在事件审查期间启动基于hii的推荐分类。统计过程控制p图分析显示,在16个月内,以系统为中心的建议从16%增加到30%。HIE促进了系统层面的变革,以防止重大事件的发生,其他组织可能会从将其纳入患者安全审查中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信