[Impact of stress-related neural activity on major adverse cardiovascular events in non-small cell lung cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET-CT].

Q3 Medicine
W Li, J H Li, J C Zhu, X G Wang, J Wu, L J Zhang, G F Yang
{"title":"[Impact of stress-related neural activity on major adverse cardiovascular events in non-small cell lung cancer patients using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET-CT].","authors":"W Li, J H Li, J C Zhu, X G Wang, J Wu, L J Zhang, G F Yang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250421-00982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the associations between stress-related neural activity (SNA) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on [<sup>18</sup>F] Fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET-CT). <b>Methods:</b> Patients with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC and with at least one-year follow up were retrospectively collected in Nanjing Jinling Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019. All the patients undergoing <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET-CT and chest CT at baseline. The maximum target-to-background ratio (TBR<sub>max</sub>) values of amygdala, which represented as SNA, and bone marrow, which represented as bone marrow activity (BMA), coronary artery calcium volume and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) were measured. Patients were grouped according to presence or absence of MACE. The baseline clinical variable, SNA, BMA and CACS were compared between two groups. Patients were divided as low-and high-amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub> groups according to the median of amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub>. According to the CACS, patients with CACS=0 were classified as non-calcification group, while those with CACS>0 are classified into the calcification group. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to plot survival curves, the log-rank test was employed to compare intergroup differences in MACE incidence and the Cox proportional hazards model was performed to analyze risk factors for MACE. <b>Results:</b> A total of 94 NSCLC patients were included, aged (61.7±11.1) years and including 62 males (66.0%). There were 13 patients (13.8%) in the MACE goup and 81 patients (86.2%) in the non-MACE group. The amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub>, coronary artery calcium volume and CACS in the MACE group were higer than those in non-MACE group. The follow-up time was [<i>M</i> (<i>Q</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>Q</i><sub>3</sub>), 41 (19, 58)] months. The cumulative incidence of MACE in the high-amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub> group was higher than that in the low-amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub> group (29.8% vs 2.6%, <i>P</i>=0.006). The cumulative incidence of MACE in the calcification group was higher than that in the noncalcification (39.9% vs 5.2%, <i>P</i>=0.010). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that compared with low-amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub> group, the incidence rate of MACE increased in high-amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub> group (<i>HR</i><sub>adj</sub>=11.832, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.328-105.457, <i>P</i>=0.027). Further, patients were grouped according to amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub> combined with CACS, high-amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub> with CACS>0 group had increased risk for MACE compared to the remaining groups (<i>HR</i><sub>adj</sub>=18.613, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.587-218.315, <i>P</i>=0.020). <b>Conclusions:</b> SNA was associated with the incidence of MACE in NSCLC patients. The incidence of MACE in high-amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub> group was higher than that in low-amygdala TBR<sub>max</sub> group.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"105 22","pages":"1827-1833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250421-00982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the associations between stress-related neural activity (SNA) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on [18F] Fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT). Methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC and with at least one-year follow up were retrospectively collected in Nanjing Jinling Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019. All the patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET-CT and chest CT at baseline. The maximum target-to-background ratio (TBRmax) values of amygdala, which represented as SNA, and bone marrow, which represented as bone marrow activity (BMA), coronary artery calcium volume and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) were measured. Patients were grouped according to presence or absence of MACE. The baseline clinical variable, SNA, BMA and CACS were compared between two groups. Patients were divided as low-and high-amygdala TBRmax groups according to the median of amygdala TBRmax. According to the CACS, patients with CACS=0 were classified as non-calcification group, while those with CACS>0 are classified into the calcification group. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to plot survival curves, the log-rank test was employed to compare intergroup differences in MACE incidence and the Cox proportional hazards model was performed to analyze risk factors for MACE. Results: A total of 94 NSCLC patients were included, aged (61.7±11.1) years and including 62 males (66.0%). There were 13 patients (13.8%) in the MACE goup and 81 patients (86.2%) in the non-MACE group. The amygdala TBRmax, coronary artery calcium volume and CACS in the MACE group were higer than those in non-MACE group. The follow-up time was [M (Q1, Q3), 41 (19, 58)] months. The cumulative incidence of MACE in the high-amygdala TBRmax group was higher than that in the low-amygdala TBRmax group (29.8% vs 2.6%, P=0.006). The cumulative incidence of MACE in the calcification group was higher than that in the noncalcification (39.9% vs 5.2%, P=0.010). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that compared with low-amygdala TBRmax group, the incidence rate of MACE increased in high-amygdala TBRmax group (HRadj=11.832, 95%CI: 1.328-105.457, P=0.027). Further, patients were grouped according to amygdala TBRmax combined with CACS, high-amygdala TBRmax with CACS>0 group had increased risk for MACE compared to the remaining groups (HRadj=18.613, 95%CI: 1.587-218.315, P=0.020). Conclusions: SNA was associated with the incidence of MACE in NSCLC patients. The incidence of MACE in high-amygdala TBRmax group was higher than that in low-amygdala TBRmax group.

[利用18F-FDG PET-CT研究压力相关神经活动对非小细胞肺癌患者主要不良心血管事件的影响]。
目的:基于[18F]氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(18F- fdg PET-CT),探讨非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者应激相关神经活动(SNA)与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的关系。方法:回顾性收集2018年1月至2019年12月南京金陵医院经病理证实诊断为非小细胞肺癌且随访1年以上的患者。所有患者在基线时接受18F-FDG PET-CT和胸部CT检查。测定杏仁核(代表SNA)和骨髓(代表骨髓活性(BMA))的最大靶本比(TBRmax)值、冠状动脉钙容量和冠状动脉钙评分(CACS)。根据有无MACE对患者进行分组。比较两组基线临床指标、SNA、BMA、CACS。根据扁桃体TBRmax中位数将患者分为低、高扁桃体TBRmax组。根据CACS,将CACS=0的患者分为非钙化组,将CACS=0的患者分为钙化组。采用Kaplan-Meier分析绘制生存曲线,采用log-rank检验比较MACE发生率组间差异,采用Cox比例风险模型分析MACE的危险因素。结果:共纳入94例NSCLC患者,年龄(61.7±11.1)岁,其中男性62例(66.0%)。MACE组13例(13.8%),非MACE组81例(86.2%)。MACE组杏仁核TBRmax、冠状动脉钙容量、CACS均高于非MACE组。随访时间为[M (Q1, Q3), 41(19, 58)]个月。高扁桃体TBRmax组MACE累积发生率高于低扁桃体TBRmax组(29.8% vs 2.6%, P=0.006)。钙化组MACE累积发生率高于非钙化组(39.9% vs 5.2%, P=0.010)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,与低杏仁核TBRmax组相比,高杏仁核TBRmax组MACE发生率增高(HRadj=11.832, 95%CI: 1.328 ~ 105.457, P=0.027)。进一步,根据杏仁核TBRmax合并CACS对患者进行分组,高杏仁核TBRmax合并CACS>组MACE发生风险较其余组增加(HRadj=18.613, 95%CI: 1.587-218.315, P=0.020)。结论:SNA与NSCLC患者MACE发生率相关。高扁桃体TBRmax组MACE发生率高于低扁桃体TBRmax组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信