Butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine and ketamine–butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine chemical immobilization in habituated subadult female giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis)
Silke Pfitzer , Liesel L. Laubscher , Jacobus P. Raath , Aleksandr Semjonov , Etienne P. Basson , Lisa L. Wolfe , Michael W. Miller , Gareth E. Zeiler
{"title":"Butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine and ketamine–butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine chemical immobilization in habituated subadult female giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis)","authors":"Silke Pfitzer , Liesel L. Laubscher , Jacobus P. Raath , Aleksandr Semjonov , Etienne P. Basson , Lisa L. Wolfe , Michael W. Miller , Gareth E. Zeiler","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the effects of butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine (BAM) and ketamine–butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine (KBAM) used for the chemical immobilization of giraffes.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Quasi-experimental trial.</div></div><div><h3>Animals</h3><div>A group of 10 habituated subadult female giraffes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five giraffe were immobilized with BAM (0.02 mL cm<sup>–1</sup> estimated shoulder height) and five with KBAM (0.015 mL cm<sup>–1</sup> estimated shoulder height BAM and 200 mg ketamine). Time to events were recorded (time to recumbency and recovery time). Physiological variables (heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, invasive arterial blood pressure and peripheral oxyhaemoglobin saturation) were recorded every 5 minutes and arterial blood gas analysis was performed every 10 minutes after instrumentation. Atipamezole (5 mg mg<sup>–1</sup> medetomidine administered) and naltrexone (1 mg mg<sup>–1</sup> butorphanol administered) were administered intramuscularly at 30 minutes post-recumbency for recovery. Time to events, physiological and arterial blood gas data were compared between drug combinations using a two-sample <em>t</em>-test (significance was <em>p</em> < 0.05). Data are shown as mean ± standard deviations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All giraffes were successfully immobilized. Based on measured shoulder height, the doses administered were 0.70 and 0.48 mg cm<sup>–1</sup> for butorphanol, 0.28 and 0.2 mg cm<sup>–1</sup> for azaperone and medetomidine in BAM and KBAM, respectively. Times to recumbency were 17.1 ± 9.3 and 6.3 ± 1.1 minutes for BAM and KBAM respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.06). All giraffes had hypoxaemia and hyperlactataemia, with PaO<sub>2</sub> values of 52 ± 13 and 41 ± 4 mmHg and lactate values of 14.4 ± 6.1 and 11.0 ± 5.5 mmol L<sup>–1</sup> for BAM and KBAM, respectively. Recoveries were calm with minimal ataxia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and clinical relevance</h3><div>BAM and KBAM produced reliable chemical immobilization for 30 minutes. The addition of ketamine to the BAM combination is recommended because of its faster induction time. Because of clinically significant hypoxaemia, oxygen supplementation should be administered if these drug combinations are used.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":"52 4","pages":"Pages 403-411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298725001011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To describe the effects of butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine (BAM) and ketamine–butorphanol–azaperone–medetomidine (KBAM) used for the chemical immobilization of giraffes.
Study design
Quasi-experimental trial.
Animals
A group of 10 habituated subadult female giraffes.
Methods
Five giraffe were immobilized with BAM (0.02 mL cm–1 estimated shoulder height) and five with KBAM (0.015 mL cm–1 estimated shoulder height BAM and 200 mg ketamine). Time to events were recorded (time to recumbency and recovery time). Physiological variables (heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, invasive arterial blood pressure and peripheral oxyhaemoglobin saturation) were recorded every 5 minutes and arterial blood gas analysis was performed every 10 minutes after instrumentation. Atipamezole (5 mg mg–1 medetomidine administered) and naltrexone (1 mg mg–1 butorphanol administered) were administered intramuscularly at 30 minutes post-recumbency for recovery. Time to events, physiological and arterial blood gas data were compared between drug combinations using a two-sample t-test (significance was p < 0.05). Data are shown as mean ± standard deviations.
Results
All giraffes were successfully immobilized. Based on measured shoulder height, the doses administered were 0.70 and 0.48 mg cm–1 for butorphanol, 0.28 and 0.2 mg cm–1 for azaperone and medetomidine in BAM and KBAM, respectively. Times to recumbency were 17.1 ± 9.3 and 6.3 ± 1.1 minutes for BAM and KBAM respectively (p = 0.06). All giraffes had hypoxaemia and hyperlactataemia, with PaO2 values of 52 ± 13 and 41 ± 4 mmHg and lactate values of 14.4 ± 6.1 and 11.0 ± 5.5 mmol L–1 for BAM and KBAM, respectively. Recoveries were calm with minimal ataxia.
Conclusion and clinical relevance
BAM and KBAM produced reliable chemical immobilization for 30 minutes. The addition of ketamine to the BAM combination is recommended because of its faster induction time. Because of clinically significant hypoxaemia, oxygen supplementation should be administered if these drug combinations are used.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome:
the basic sciences;
pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management
equipment
intensive care
chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals
welfare issues associated with pain and distress
education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia.
Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.