Current red blood cell and platelet transfusion practices in Canadian neonatal intensive care units.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1111/trf.18305
Mathilde Lamothe, Marc Beltempo, Anie Lapointe, Andréanne Villeneuve
{"title":"Current red blood cell and platelet transfusion practices in Canadian neonatal intensive care units.","authors":"Mathilde Lamothe, Marc Beltempo, Anie Lapointe, Andréanne Villeneuve","doi":"10.1111/trf.18305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red blood cell and platelet transfusions are often prescribed in preterm infants. Consensus on the best transfusion practices in this population has still not been reached, causing disparities in neonatal care. The objective of this study is to provide updated data on current red blood cell and platelet transfusion practices in preterm neonates regarding thresholds and justifications associated with the decision to transfuse.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>An electronic survey was sent to one neonatology representative of each center of the Canadian Neonatal Network (31 sites). Descriptive data from each center was collected from the Network's work database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than half of the respondents (54.8%) have a red blood cell transfusion protocol, while only 32.3% of centers have a platelet transfusion protocol. The most commonly reported justification for red blood cell transfusion is low levels of hemoglobin (100%), while the severity of illness and hemodynamic instability were also frequently mentioned (58.1% and 35.5%). For platelet transfusion justifications, the most reported is low platelet count (96.8%), followed by significant bleeding (93.6%) and severity of illness (35.5%). The reported thresholds also vary greatly depending on the presence of oxygen support for red blood cell transfusions and the occurrence of bleeding or invasive procedures for platelets.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is great variability between Canadian centers concerning red blood cells and platelet transfusions in preterm neonates. Practice guidelines should be established for better oversight of transfusion practices in preterm infants to support more judicious use of blood products.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"1427-1443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Red blood cell and platelet transfusions are often prescribed in preterm infants. Consensus on the best transfusion practices in this population has still not been reached, causing disparities in neonatal care. The objective of this study is to provide updated data on current red blood cell and platelet transfusion practices in preterm neonates regarding thresholds and justifications associated with the decision to transfuse.

Study design and methods: An electronic survey was sent to one neonatology representative of each center of the Canadian Neonatal Network (31 sites). Descriptive data from each center was collected from the Network's work database.

Results: More than half of the respondents (54.8%) have a red blood cell transfusion protocol, while only 32.3% of centers have a platelet transfusion protocol. The most commonly reported justification for red blood cell transfusion is low levels of hemoglobin (100%), while the severity of illness and hemodynamic instability were also frequently mentioned (58.1% and 35.5%). For platelet transfusion justifications, the most reported is low platelet count (96.8%), followed by significant bleeding (93.6%) and severity of illness (35.5%). The reported thresholds also vary greatly depending on the presence of oxygen support for red blood cell transfusions and the occurrence of bleeding or invasive procedures for platelets.

Discussion: There is great variability between Canadian centers concerning red blood cells and platelet transfusions in preterm neonates. Practice guidelines should be established for better oversight of transfusion practices in preterm infants to support more judicious use of blood products.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

目前加拿大新生儿重症监护病房的红细胞和血小板输注实践。
背景:红细胞和血小板输注常用于早产儿。在这一人群中仍未就最佳输血做法达成共识,造成新生儿护理方面的差异。本研究的目的是提供当前早产儿红细胞和血小板输注实践的最新数据,涉及输注决定的阈值和理由。研究设计和方法:向加拿大新生儿网络(31个站点)每个中心的一名新生儿代表发送电子调查。从网络的工作数据库中收集每个中心的描述性数据。结果:超过一半的受访者(54.8%)有红细胞输注方案,而只有32.3%的中心有血小板输注方案。输血最常见的理由是血红蛋白水平低(100%),而疾病的严重程度和血流动力学不稳定也经常被提及(58.1%和35.5%)。对于输血小板的理由,报告最多的是血小板计数低(96.8%),其次是大出血(93.6%)和疾病严重程度(35.5%)。报告的阈值也有很大差异,这取决于红细胞输注时氧支持的存在和出血或血小板侵入性手术的发生。讨论:加拿大各中心在早产儿红细胞和血小板输注方面存在很大差异。应制定实践指南,以便更好地监督早产儿的输血做法,以支持更明智地使用血液制品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信