Investigating the Impact of Home Care Services after Lumbar Fusion on Readmission, Reoperation, and Patient Reported Outcomes.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005422
Jonathan Dalton, Jarod Olson, Robert J Oris, Rajkishen Narayanan, Michael McCurdy, Jeremy Heard, Abbey Glover, Aryan Gajjar, James Kim, Mina Ebrahimi, Akshay Khanna, Barrett I Woods, Mark F Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Thomas D Cha, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"Investigating the Impact of Home Care Services after Lumbar Fusion on Readmission, Reoperation, and Patient Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Jonathan Dalton, Jarod Olson, Robert J Oris, Rajkishen Narayanan, Michael McCurdy, Jeremy Heard, Abbey Glover, Aryan Gajjar, James Kim, Mina Ebrahimi, Akshay Khanna, Barrett I Woods, Mark F Kurd, Ian David Kaye, Thomas D Cha, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Investigate how home care (HC) services impact utilization of postoperative resources and outcomes after lumbar fusion.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Utilization of spinal fusion has increased over the past decade-it has become important to coordinate postoperative discharge that maximizes rehabilitation and cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bundled payment information of lumbar fusion episodes of care from a private payer (2019-2021) was reviewed to identify patients. Manual chart review was conducted to evaluate demographic/surgical details, complications, and readmissions. Insurance claims data was reviewed to identify HC utilization after discharge-disposition was designated as home with HC versus no HC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>758 patients were included (13.6% HC, 86.4% no HC). Patients with HC were older (68.6±9.76 vs. 59.5±11.2;P<0.001), had higher BMI (31.1±6.17 vs. 30±5.9;P<0.001), and CCI (1.07±1.24 vs. 0.59±0.91;P=0.002), and longer operative time (211±86.7 vs.178±78.9;P<0.001). HC was associated with 90-day reoperation (13.6% vs. 1.07%;P<0.001), and readmission (30-day:7.77% vs. 1.98%;90-day:12.6% vs. 3.51%;P<0.001). HC was associated with reoperation for compressive fluid/dural repair (2.91% vs. 0.31%), and wound complication/infections (3.88% vs. 0%), and with medical readmissions (4.85% vs. 1.53%;P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, HC was an independent predictor of further healthcare utilization-office visits (incidence rate ratio (IRR):1.14;P=0.049), phone calls (IRR:1.38;P=0.02), and ED visits (IRR:6.5;P<0.001). Despite similar preoperative physical function scores (SF-12 PCS), HC was associated with worse 6-month (P<0.001) and 1-year scores (P=0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients receiving HC were older, sicker, and had longer surgeries. Patients with HC experienced more readmissions and reoperations particularly for wound and medical issues. HC independently predicted further postoperative healthcare utilization via office calls/visits and ED visits. These findings suggest that patients requiring HC are a particularly vulnerable population and that HC does not exert a protective effect against additional healthcare utilization. Further research is needed to identify proactive interventions that can decrease cost and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort.

Objective: Investigate how home care (HC) services impact utilization of postoperative resources and outcomes after lumbar fusion.

Summary of background data: Utilization of spinal fusion has increased over the past decade-it has become important to coordinate postoperative discharge that maximizes rehabilitation and cost-effectiveness.

Methods: Bundled payment information of lumbar fusion episodes of care from a private payer (2019-2021) was reviewed to identify patients. Manual chart review was conducted to evaluate demographic/surgical details, complications, and readmissions. Insurance claims data was reviewed to identify HC utilization after discharge-disposition was designated as home with HC versus no HC.

Results: 758 patients were included (13.6% HC, 86.4% no HC). Patients with HC were older (68.6±9.76 vs. 59.5±11.2;P<0.001), had higher BMI (31.1±6.17 vs. 30±5.9;P<0.001), and CCI (1.07±1.24 vs. 0.59±0.91;P=0.002), and longer operative time (211±86.7 vs.178±78.9;P<0.001). HC was associated with 90-day reoperation (13.6% vs. 1.07%;P<0.001), and readmission (30-day:7.77% vs. 1.98%;90-day:12.6% vs. 3.51%;P<0.001). HC was associated with reoperation for compressive fluid/dural repair (2.91% vs. 0.31%), and wound complication/infections (3.88% vs. 0%), and with medical readmissions (4.85% vs. 1.53%;P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, HC was an independent predictor of further healthcare utilization-office visits (incidence rate ratio (IRR):1.14;P=0.049), phone calls (IRR:1.38;P=0.02), and ED visits (IRR:6.5;P<0.001). Despite similar preoperative physical function scores (SF-12 PCS), HC was associated with worse 6-month (P<0.001) and 1-year scores (P=0.05).

Conclusion: Patients receiving HC were older, sicker, and had longer surgeries. Patients with HC experienced more readmissions and reoperations particularly for wound and medical issues. HC independently predicted further postoperative healthcare utilization via office calls/visits and ED visits. These findings suggest that patients requiring HC are a particularly vulnerable population and that HC does not exert a protective effect against additional healthcare utilization. Further research is needed to identify proactive interventions that can decrease cost and improve outcomes.

调查腰椎融合术后家庭护理服务对再入院、再手术和患者报告结果的影响。
研究设计:回顾性队列。目的:探讨家庭护理服务对腰椎融合术术后资源利用及预后的影响。背景资料摘要:在过去的十年中,脊柱融合术的应用有所增加,协调术后出院以最大限度地提高康复和成本效益变得非常重要。方法:回顾私人付款人(2019-2021年)腰椎融合治疗的捆绑付款信息,以确定患者。进行手工图表回顾以评估人口统计学/手术细节、并发症和再入院情况。对保险索赔数据进行了审查,以确定出院后HC的使用情况-处置被指定为有HC与无HC的家庭。结果:共纳入758例,其中HC占13.6%,未HC占86.4%。HC患者年龄较大(68.6±9.76∶59.5±11.2);结论:HC患者年龄较大、病情较重、手术时间较长。HC患者有更多的再入院和再手术,特别是伤口和医疗问题。HC通过办公室电话/访问和急诊科访问独立预测进一步的术后医疗保健利用。这些发现表明,需要HC的患者是一个特别脆弱的人群,并且HC对额外的医疗保健利用不起保护作用。需要进一步的研究来确定能够降低成本和改善结果的主动干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信