The Relationship between Stigma and Healthcare Interaction in Alopecia Areata.

IF 1.4 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Ursula Biba, Samantha Gregoire, Katherine Sanchez, Natasha Atanaskova Mesinkovska, Monique Margaret Waldman, Lisa Anderson, Arash Mostaghimi
{"title":"The Relationship between Stigma and Healthcare Interaction in Alopecia Areata.","authors":"Ursula Biba, Samantha Gregoire, Katherine Sanchez, Natasha Atanaskova Mesinkovska, Monique Margaret Waldman, Lisa Anderson, Arash Mostaghimi","doi":"10.1159/000546216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>People with alopecia areata (AA) experience stigma, but little is known about how this affects healthcare interaction (HCI). We aim to explore the relationship between stigma and HCI in AA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of 500 members of the National Alopecia Areata Foundation was performed. Survey items related to stigma and HCI were summed and sorted into low, medium, and high tertiles. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed to control for demographic and clinical factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (<i>n</i> = 500) were white (80.0%), female (86.2%), and insured (96.0%), with a plurality earning over USD 100,000 annually (34.2%). Participants in the high-stigma subgroup were more likely to be in the low-HCI subgroup (relative risk ratio [RRR]: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.31-3.76; <i>p</i> = 0.003), in comparison to participants in the low- or moderate-stigma subgroups (RRR for both: 0.45; <i>p</i> < 0.05). This relationship was independent of demographics and clinical characteristics. However, data are from a population with limited socioeconomic diversity and high baseline healthcare engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>People with AA who experience high stigma are less likely to interact with the healthcare system, which cannot be explained by demographics or clinical factors. Stigma and HCI may be related in a dose-dependent manner, and future investigation is needed to support access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21844,"journal":{"name":"Skin Appendage Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Appendage Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: People with alopecia areata (AA) experience stigma, but little is known about how this affects healthcare interaction (HCI). We aim to explore the relationship between stigma and HCI in AA.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 500 members of the National Alopecia Areata Foundation was performed. Survey items related to stigma and HCI were summed and sorted into low, medium, and high tertiles. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed to control for demographic and clinical factors.

Results: Respondents (n = 500) were white (80.0%), female (86.2%), and insured (96.0%), with a plurality earning over USD 100,000 annually (34.2%). Participants in the high-stigma subgroup were more likely to be in the low-HCI subgroup (relative risk ratio [RRR]: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.31-3.76; p = 0.003), in comparison to participants in the low- or moderate-stigma subgroups (RRR for both: 0.45; p < 0.05). This relationship was independent of demographics and clinical characteristics. However, data are from a population with limited socioeconomic diversity and high baseline healthcare engagement.

Conclusion: People with AA who experience high stigma are less likely to interact with the healthcare system, which cannot be explained by demographics or clinical factors. Stigma and HCI may be related in a dose-dependent manner, and future investigation is needed to support access to care.

斑秃病耻感与保健相互作用的关系。
简介:斑秃(AA)的人经历耻辱,但很少知道这是如何影响医疗互动(HCI)。我们的目的是探讨AA病耻感与HCI之间的关系。方法:对全国斑秃基金会500名会员进行横断面调查。与柱头和HCI相关的调查项目被总结并分为低、中、高三分位数。采用多项逻辑回归控制人口统计学和临床因素。结果:受访者(n = 500)为白人(80.0%)、女性(86.2%)和有保险(96.0%),其中年收入超过10万美元的占34.2%。高耻感亚组的参与者更有可能进入低耻感亚组(相对风险比[RRR]: 2.22;95% ci: 1.31-3.76;p = 0.003),与低或中度病耻感亚组的参与者相比(两者的RRR: 0.45;P < 0.05)。这种关系与人口统计学和临床特征无关。然而,数据来自有限的社会经济多样性和高基线医疗保健参与的人群。结论:高耻辱感的AA患者较少与卫生保健系统互动,这不能用人口统计学或临床因素来解释。耻辱感和HCI可能以剂量依赖的方式相关,需要进一步调查以支持获得护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信