Web-Based Psychoeducational Intervention to Improve Family Caregiver Preparedness in Specialized Palliative Home Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cecilia Bauman, Kristofer Årestedt, Viktoria Wallin, Louise Häger Tibell, Per Fürst, Peter Hudson, Ulrika Kreicbergs, Anette Alvariza
{"title":"Web-Based Psychoeducational Intervention to Improve Family Caregiver Preparedness in Specialized Palliative Home Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Cecilia Bauman, Kristofer Årestedt, Viktoria Wallin, Louise Häger Tibell, Per Fürst, Peter Hudson, Ulrika Kreicbergs, Anette Alvariza","doi":"10.1002/pon.70202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Preparedness for caregiving refers to how ready family caregivers perceive themselves for caregiving tasks and stress of the caregiving role. This study investigated whether a web-based psychoeducational intervention could improve preparedness for caregiving among family caregivers of patients receiving specialized palliative home care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The intervention \"narstaende.se\" was provided via a website featuring 23 short videos in which healthcare professionals and family caregivers (actors) discussed key care-related issues. Family caregivers were randomized to the intervention or control group and completed the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS) at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models. The intervention effect was assessed based on PCS scores of the entire sample, followed by subgroup analyses based on level of baseline preparedness for caregiving, participation in physical care, and active intervention use, as determined by responses to single-item questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 family caregivers were recruited (103 intervention, 102 control). The intervention had no significant effect on preparedness for caregiving, including in subgroups based on level of baseline preparedness for caregiving, participation in physical care, or active intervention use. However, all subgroups reported higher levels of preparedness for caregiving at both follow-up assessments than at baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preparedness for caregiving improved over time in both the intervention and control groups, suggesting other contributing factors. Limited participant engagement may explain the lack of intervention effect. Future studies should evaluate the intervention with more structured and clinically integrated use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 6","pages":"e70202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Preparedness for caregiving refers to how ready family caregivers perceive themselves for caregiving tasks and stress of the caregiving role. This study investigated whether a web-based psychoeducational intervention could improve preparedness for caregiving among family caregivers of patients receiving specialized palliative home care.

Methods: The intervention "narstaende.se" was provided via a website featuring 23 short videos in which healthcare professionals and family caregivers (actors) discussed key care-related issues. Family caregivers were randomized to the intervention or control group and completed the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS) at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models. The intervention effect was assessed based on PCS scores of the entire sample, followed by subgroup analyses based on level of baseline preparedness for caregiving, participation in physical care, and active intervention use, as determined by responses to single-item questions.

Results: A total of 205 family caregivers were recruited (103 intervention, 102 control). The intervention had no significant effect on preparedness for caregiving, including in subgroups based on level of baseline preparedness for caregiving, participation in physical care, or active intervention use. However, all subgroups reported higher levels of preparedness for caregiving at both follow-up assessments than at baseline.

Conclusions: Preparedness for caregiving improved over time in both the intervention and control groups, suggesting other contributing factors. Limited participant engagement may explain the lack of intervention effect. Future studies should evaluate the intervention with more structured and clinically integrated use.

基于网络的心理教育干预提高专业姑息家庭护理中家庭照顾者的准备:一项随机对照试验。
目的:照顾准备是指家庭照顾者对照顾任务和照顾角色压力的准备程度。本研究调查了基于网络的心理教育干预是否可以提高接受专业姑息家庭护理患者的家庭照顾者的护理准备。方法:采用纳斯坦德干预。“Se”是通过一个网站提供的,该网站有23个短视频,其中医疗保健专业人员和家庭护理人员(演员)讨论了与护理有关的关键问题。家庭照顾者随机分为干预组和对照组,分别在基线、第4周和第8周完成照顾准备量表(PCS)。数据分析采用线性混合模型。干预效果是根据整个样本的PCS分数来评估的,随后是基于基线护理准备水平、参与身体护理和积极干预使用的亚组分析,由对单项问题的回答来确定。结果:共招募205名家庭照顾者(干预103名,对照组102名)。干预对护理准备没有显著影响,包括基于基线护理准备水平、参与身体护理或积极干预使用的亚组。然而,在两次随访评估中,所有亚组报告的护理准备水平均高于基线水平。结论:随着时间的推移,干预组和对照组的护理准备都有所改善,这表明还有其他因素在起作用。有限的参与者参与可以解释缺乏干预效果。未来的研究应评估更结构化和临床综合使用的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信