Brain and Behavior in Persuasion: The Role of Affective-Cognitive Matching.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
S Di Plinio, A Aquino, G Haddock, F R Alparone, S J H Ebisch
{"title":"Brain and Behavior in Persuasion: The Role of Affective-Cognitive Matching.","authors":"S Di Plinio, A Aquino, G Haddock, F R Alparone, S J H Ebisch","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effectiveness of persuasive messages often depends on how their affective or cognitive content aligns with recipients' predispositions for processing such information. Individual differences in the need for affect (NFA) and need for cognition (NFC) influence engagement with affective or cognitive appeals, but the interplay between intrinsic brain connectivity and these predispositions in shaping persuasive outcomes remains underexplored. This study advances understanding of the affective-cognitive matching effect by integrating intrinsic (resting-state) and extrinsic (task-based) brain-behavior relationships. Using resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigate how NFA and NFC align with intrinsic brain network properties and influence behavioral and neural responses to affective and cognitive persuasive messages. We employ intrinsic connectivity metrics, such as participation coefficient (cross-network communication) and within-module degree (within-network communication), to capture resting-state network dynamics not examined in previous studies. Our results reveal that key regions within the frontoparietal network, which is central to attention, decision-making, and executive functions, play pivotal roles in processing persuasive messages based on participants' motivational orientations. Specifically, affective-oriented individuals exhibit greater neural engagement with congruent affective messages, while cognitive-oriented individuals show intensified engagement under incongruent conditions-a novel finding extending beyond prior research. These findings expand the affective-cognitive matching effect to include intrinsic neural dimensions, highlighting how resting-state brain connectivity primes responses and modulates task engagement according to motivational predispositions. This integrative approach supports the Elaboration Likelihood Model by elucidating distinct neural pathways in persuasion and offers actionable insights for tailoring persuasive strategies to individual affective and cognitive orientations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effectiveness of persuasive messages often depends on how their affective or cognitive content aligns with recipients' predispositions for processing such information. Individual differences in the need for affect (NFA) and need for cognition (NFC) influence engagement with affective or cognitive appeals, but the interplay between intrinsic brain connectivity and these predispositions in shaping persuasive outcomes remains underexplored. This study advances understanding of the affective-cognitive matching effect by integrating intrinsic (resting-state) and extrinsic (task-based) brain-behavior relationships. Using resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigate how NFA and NFC align with intrinsic brain network properties and influence behavioral and neural responses to affective and cognitive persuasive messages. We employ intrinsic connectivity metrics, such as participation coefficient (cross-network communication) and within-module degree (within-network communication), to capture resting-state network dynamics not examined in previous studies. Our results reveal that key regions within the frontoparietal network, which is central to attention, decision-making, and executive functions, play pivotal roles in processing persuasive messages based on participants' motivational orientations. Specifically, affective-oriented individuals exhibit greater neural engagement with congruent affective messages, while cognitive-oriented individuals show intensified engagement under incongruent conditions-a novel finding extending beyond prior research. These findings expand the affective-cognitive matching effect to include intrinsic neural dimensions, highlighting how resting-state brain connectivity primes responses and modulates task engagement according to motivational predispositions. This integrative approach supports the Elaboration Likelihood Model by elucidating distinct neural pathways in persuasion and offers actionable insights for tailoring persuasive strategies to individual affective and cognitive orientations.

说服中的大脑与行为:情感-认知匹配的作用。
说服性信息的有效性通常取决于它们的情感或认知内容如何与接受者处理这些信息的倾向相一致。情感需求(NFA)和认知需求(NFC)的个体差异影响情感或认知诉求的参与,但大脑内在连通性与这些倾向之间的相互作用在形成有说服力的结果方面仍未得到充分探讨。本研究通过整合内在(静息状态)和外在(任务型)脑-行为关系,促进了对情感-认知匹配效应的理解。利用静息状态和基于任务的功能磁共振成像(fMRI),我们研究了NFA和NFC如何与内在大脑网络特性对齐,并影响对情感和认知说服信息的行为和神经反应。我们采用内在连通性指标,如参与系数(跨网络通信)和模块内度(网络内通信),以捕获静息状态网络动力学未在以往的研究中检查。我们的研究结果表明,额顶叶网络中的关键区域是注意力、决策和执行功能的中心,在基于参与者动机取向的说服性信息处理中起着关键作用。具体来说,情感导向的个体对一致的情感信息表现出更大的神经参与,而认知导向的个体在不一致的条件下表现出更强的参与——这是一个超越先前研究的新发现。这些发现将情感-认知匹配效应扩展到包括内在神经维度,突出了静息状态下大脑连接如何启动反应并根据动机倾向调节任务参与。这种综合方法通过阐明说服中不同的神经通路来支持精化可能性模型,并为根据个人情感和认知取向定制说服策略提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信