S Di Plinio, A Aquino, G Haddock, F R Alparone, S J H Ebisch
{"title":"Brain and Behavior in Persuasion: The Role of Affective-Cognitive Matching.","authors":"S Di Plinio, A Aquino, G Haddock, F R Alparone, S J H Ebisch","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effectiveness of persuasive messages often depends on how their affective or cognitive content aligns with recipients' predispositions for processing such information. Individual differences in the need for affect (NFA) and need for cognition (NFC) influence engagement with affective or cognitive appeals, but the interplay between intrinsic brain connectivity and these predispositions in shaping persuasive outcomes remains underexplored. This study advances understanding of the affective-cognitive matching effect by integrating intrinsic (resting-state) and extrinsic (task-based) brain-behavior relationships. Using resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigate how NFA and NFC align with intrinsic brain network properties and influence behavioral and neural responses to affective and cognitive persuasive messages. We employ intrinsic connectivity metrics, such as participation coefficient (cross-network communication) and within-module degree (within-network communication), to capture resting-state network dynamics not examined in previous studies. Our results reveal that key regions within the frontoparietal network, which is central to attention, decision-making, and executive functions, play pivotal roles in processing persuasive messages based on participants' motivational orientations. Specifically, affective-oriented individuals exhibit greater neural engagement with congruent affective messages, while cognitive-oriented individuals show intensified engagement under incongruent conditions-a novel finding extending beyond prior research. These findings expand the affective-cognitive matching effect to include intrinsic neural dimensions, highlighting how resting-state brain connectivity primes responses and modulates task engagement according to motivational predispositions. This integrative approach supports the Elaboration Likelihood Model by elucidating distinct neural pathways in persuasion and offers actionable insights for tailoring persuasive strategies to individual affective and cognitive orientations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The effectiveness of persuasive messages often depends on how their affective or cognitive content aligns with recipients' predispositions for processing such information. Individual differences in the need for affect (NFA) and need for cognition (NFC) influence engagement with affective or cognitive appeals, but the interplay between intrinsic brain connectivity and these predispositions in shaping persuasive outcomes remains underexplored. This study advances understanding of the affective-cognitive matching effect by integrating intrinsic (resting-state) and extrinsic (task-based) brain-behavior relationships. Using resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigate how NFA and NFC align with intrinsic brain network properties and influence behavioral and neural responses to affective and cognitive persuasive messages. We employ intrinsic connectivity metrics, such as participation coefficient (cross-network communication) and within-module degree (within-network communication), to capture resting-state network dynamics not examined in previous studies. Our results reveal that key regions within the frontoparietal network, which is central to attention, decision-making, and executive functions, play pivotal roles in processing persuasive messages based on participants' motivational orientations. Specifically, affective-oriented individuals exhibit greater neural engagement with congruent affective messages, while cognitive-oriented individuals show intensified engagement under incongruent conditions-a novel finding extending beyond prior research. These findings expand the affective-cognitive matching effect to include intrinsic neural dimensions, highlighting how resting-state brain connectivity primes responses and modulates task engagement according to motivational predispositions. This integrative approach supports the Elaboration Likelihood Model by elucidating distinct neural pathways in persuasion and offers actionable insights for tailoring persuasive strategies to individual affective and cognitive orientations.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.