What Is the Evidence on Immunomodulators and Immunosuppressants for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis? - A Cochrane Review Summary with Commentary.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1177/10538135251346351
Antimo Moretti
{"title":"What Is the Evidence on Immunomodulators and Immunosuppressants for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis? - A Cochrane Review Summary with Commentary.","authors":"Antimo Moretti","doi":"10.1177/10538135251346351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system and is a major cause of disability in adults, particularly in those affected by progressive MS. A variety of drugs with different effects, some carrying significant risks, are currently available, making evidence-based approach essential for clinicians treating MS patients.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS).MethodsA systematic search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trials registers on 8 august 2022, including RCTs comparing immunomodulators and immunosuppressants versus placebo or another drug.ResultsThe network meta-analysis (NMA) included 23 RCTs (with 10,167 participants). Moderate certainty of evidence suggests that rituximab probably not reduce the risk of relapse at 2 years, while interferon beta-1b probably reduces the risk of relapses at 3 years (-18%) compared to placebo in PMS people. Regarding SAE, low-to-very-low certainty of evidence for no increased risk with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) versus placebo is available, except for immunoglobulins that seem to have a 7-fold increased risk of serious adverse events (SAEs). Only low-to-very low certainty of evidence is available about disability progression and SAEs in PMS people treated with DMTs versus placebo. On the other side, the risk for treatment discontinuation due to AEs is increased with interferon beta-1a by 2.93-fold, and probably increased with interferon-beta-1b, glatiramer acetate, and fingolimod by 2.98-fold, 3.98-fold, and 2.29-fold, respectively. Also, rituximab, natalizumab, siponimod, and ocrelizumab probably do not increase the risk for treatment discontinuation due to AEs, while laquinimod may not increase the risk treatment discontinuation due to AEs.ConclusionsCompared with placebo, two-, and three-year treatment with rituximab or interferon beta-1b, respectively, probably slightly reduce relapses in PMS people. A slight increase of treatment discontinuation due to AEs has been reported for rituximab, interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a, immunoglobulins, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod, siponimod, and ocrelizumab. No reliable evidence is available for disability progression and SAEs with available DMTs compared to placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"577-580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251346351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system and is a major cause of disability in adults, particularly in those affected by progressive MS. A variety of drugs with different effects, some carrying significant risks, are currently available, making evidence-based approach essential for clinicians treating MS patients.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS).MethodsA systematic search was performed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and trials registers on 8 august 2022, including RCTs comparing immunomodulators and immunosuppressants versus placebo or another drug.ResultsThe network meta-analysis (NMA) included 23 RCTs (with 10,167 participants). Moderate certainty of evidence suggests that rituximab probably not reduce the risk of relapse at 2 years, while interferon beta-1b probably reduces the risk of relapses at 3 years (-18%) compared to placebo in PMS people. Regarding SAE, low-to-very-low certainty of evidence for no increased risk with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) versus placebo is available, except for immunoglobulins that seem to have a 7-fold increased risk of serious adverse events (SAEs). Only low-to-very low certainty of evidence is available about disability progression and SAEs in PMS people treated with DMTs versus placebo. On the other side, the risk for treatment discontinuation due to AEs is increased with interferon beta-1a by 2.93-fold, and probably increased with interferon-beta-1b, glatiramer acetate, and fingolimod by 2.98-fold, 3.98-fold, and 2.29-fold, respectively. Also, rituximab, natalizumab, siponimod, and ocrelizumab probably do not increase the risk for treatment discontinuation due to AEs, while laquinimod may not increase the risk treatment discontinuation due to AEs.ConclusionsCompared with placebo, two-, and three-year treatment with rituximab or interferon beta-1b, respectively, probably slightly reduce relapses in PMS people. A slight increase of treatment discontinuation due to AEs has been reported for rituximab, interferon beta-1b, interferon beta-1a, immunoglobulins, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod, siponimod, and ocrelizumab. No reliable evidence is available for disability progression and SAEs with available DMTs compared to placebo.

免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂治疗进展性多发性硬化的证据是什么?- Cochrane综述摘要及评论。
多发性硬化症(MS)是一种影响中枢神经系统的慢性炎症性脱髓鞘疾病,是成人致残的主要原因,尤其是进行性MS患者。目前有多种不同疗效的药物,其中一些具有显著风险,因此临床医生治疗MS患者必须采用循证方法。目的比较免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂治疗进行性多发性硬化症(PMS)的疗效和安全性。方法于2022年8月8日在CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase和试验注册库中进行系统检索,包括比较免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂与安慰剂或其他药物的随机对照试验。结果网络荟萃分析(NMA)纳入23项随机对照试验(共10,167名受试者)。中度确定性证据表明,与安慰剂相比,利妥昔单抗可能不会降低经前症候群患者2年复发的风险,而干扰素β -1b可能会降低经前症候群患者3年复发的风险(-18%)。关于SAE,除了免疫球蛋白似乎有7倍的严重不良事件(SAE)风险增加外,疾病改善疗法(dmt)与安慰剂相比没有增加风险的证据具有低至极低的确定性。对于经前症候群患者接受dmt治疗与安慰剂治疗的残疾进展和SAEs,只有低至极低确定性的证据。另一方面,干扰素β -1a组因ae而中断治疗的风险增加了2.93倍,干扰素β -1b、醋酸格拉替默和芬戈莫德组可能分别增加了2.98倍、3.98倍和2.29倍。此外,利妥昔单抗、那他珠单抗、西波尼莫特和奥克雷珠单抗可能不会增加因不良事件而中断治疗的风险,而拉喹莫德可能不会增加因不良事件而中断治疗的风险。结论与安慰剂相比,分别使用利妥昔单抗或干扰素β -1b治疗2年和3年可能略微减少经前综合征患者的复发。有报道称,美罗华单抗、干扰素β -1b、干扰素β -1a、免疫球蛋白、醋酸格拉替默、那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德、西波尼莫德和奥克雷珠单抗因不良事件而中断治疗的人数略有增加。与安慰剂相比,没有可靠的证据表明可用的dmt与残疾进展和SAEs有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信