Experimental comparison of the genetic component of pollinator effectiveness in a shrub pollinated by birds, non-flying mammals and European honeybees.

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Stanislaw K Wawrzyczek, Siegfried L Krauss, Susan E Hoebee, Ryan D Phillips
{"title":"Experimental comparison of the genetic component of pollinator effectiveness in a shrub pollinated by birds, non-flying mammals and European honeybees.","authors":"Stanislaw K Wawrzyczek, Siegfried L Krauss, Susan E Hoebee, Ryan D Phillips","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05736-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The range and frequency of pollinator movement, influences patterns of pollen dispersal with consequences for plant mating. It is predicted that pollination by birds promotes outcrossing and multiple paternity. Alternatively, pollination by insects or non-flying mammals (NFMs) is expected to increase inbreeding and correlation of paternity, leading to less genetically diverse and less vigorous seedlings. We tested these predictions in Banksia catoglypta (Proteaceae)-an obligately outcrossing heathland shrub pollinated by honeyeater birds, NFMs (honey possums and rodents) and insects (mostly introduced Apis mellifera). Previous research employing selective pollinator exclusion determined that pollination by NFMs was associated with reduced fruit set, compared to flying pollinators. Here, we used microsatellite genotyping of seedling families and a common garden experiment to compare the effectiveness of bird, NFM, and insect pollinators in terms of the genetic quality and vigour of the resulting seedlings. Despite floral traits of B. catoglypta suggesting adaptation to mammalian pollinators, pollination solely by NFMs led to lower multilocus outcrossing rates (tm, indicating biparental inbreeding) and higher correlation of paternity (rp), compared to pollination by flying pollinators (birds and insects combined). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between pollination treatments and open-pollinated controls. Overall, seedling survival was positively correlated with individual heterozygosity, with seedlings resulting from pollination solely by NFMs least likely to survive, and exclusion of NFMs associated with increased seedling survival-although these effects were slight. Our results highlight the importance of quantifying plant mating and seedling fitness for understanding the consequences of pollination by different animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 7","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05736-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The range and frequency of pollinator movement, influences patterns of pollen dispersal with consequences for plant mating. It is predicted that pollination by birds promotes outcrossing and multiple paternity. Alternatively, pollination by insects or non-flying mammals (NFMs) is expected to increase inbreeding and correlation of paternity, leading to less genetically diverse and less vigorous seedlings. We tested these predictions in Banksia catoglypta (Proteaceae)-an obligately outcrossing heathland shrub pollinated by honeyeater birds, NFMs (honey possums and rodents) and insects (mostly introduced Apis mellifera). Previous research employing selective pollinator exclusion determined that pollination by NFMs was associated with reduced fruit set, compared to flying pollinators. Here, we used microsatellite genotyping of seedling families and a common garden experiment to compare the effectiveness of bird, NFM, and insect pollinators in terms of the genetic quality and vigour of the resulting seedlings. Despite floral traits of B. catoglypta suggesting adaptation to mammalian pollinators, pollination solely by NFMs led to lower multilocus outcrossing rates (tm, indicating biparental inbreeding) and higher correlation of paternity (rp), compared to pollination by flying pollinators (birds and insects combined). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between pollination treatments and open-pollinated controls. Overall, seedling survival was positively correlated with individual heterozygosity, with seedlings resulting from pollination solely by NFMs least likely to survive, and exclusion of NFMs associated with increased seedling survival-although these effects were slight. Our results highlight the importance of quantifying plant mating and seedling fitness for understanding the consequences of pollination by different animals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

由鸟类、非飞行哺乳动物和欧洲蜜蜂传粉的灌木传粉者有效性遗传成分的实验比较。
传粉者运动的范围和频率影响花粉传播的模式,从而影响植物的交配。预测鸟类传粉促进异交和多父性。另外,昆虫或非飞行哺乳动物(nfm)的授粉预计会增加近亲繁殖和父系相关性,导致遗传多样性降低和幼苗不那么强壮。我们在Banksia catoglypta (Proteaceae)中测试了这些预测,Banksia catoglypta是一种专性异交的石南灌木,由蜜水鸟、nfm(蜜负鼠和啮齿动物)和昆虫(主要是引进的蜜蜂)授粉。先前采用选择性排除传粉者的研究表明,与飞行传粉者相比,nfm授粉与坐果减少有关。在这里,我们使用了幼苗科的微卫星基因分型和一个普通的花园实验来比较鸟类、NFM和昆虫传粉者在所得幼苗的遗传质量和活力方面的有效性。尽管植物性状显示出对哺乳动物传粉者的适应性,但与飞行传粉者(鸟类和昆虫的结合)相比,单由nfm传粉的多位点异交率(tm,表明双亲本近交)较低,父系相关性(rp)较高。此外,授粉处理与开放授粉对照间无显著差异。总体而言,幼苗存活率与个体杂合度呈正相关,仅由nfm授粉产生的幼苗存活率最低,而排除nfm与幼苗存活率增加相关,尽管这些影响很小。我们的研究结果强调了量化植物交配和幼苗适合度对于理解不同动物授粉的后果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信