Evaluation and Comparison of Treatment Response and In-Hospital Prognosis of COVID-19-Related Guillain-Barre Syndrome with Non-COVID-19 Patients.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.39.34
Behnaz Ansari, Niloofar Rezaei, Mohsen Kheradmand, Mohammad Amin Najafi, Keivan Basiri
{"title":"Evaluation and Comparison of Treatment Response and In-Hospital Prognosis of COVID-19-Related Guillain-Barre Syndrome with Non-COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Behnaz Ansari, Niloofar Rezaei, Mohsen Kheradmand, Mohammad Amin Najafi, Keivan Basiri","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.39.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has caused significant health and social impacts worldwide. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, can lead to neurological symptoms, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This study aimed to compare the clinical manifestations, electrophysiological characteristics, degree of disability, and treatment outcomes of GBS patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19-related GBS) with GBS patients without COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of GBS patients with a history of COVID-19. A total of 60 patients with GBS and a history of COVID-19 were included in the COVID-19 group, while 56 patients with GBS without COVID-19 were included in the control group. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic data were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The COVID-19 patients were older (56.2 ± 16.8 vs 47.46 ± 19.25; <i>P</i> = 0.01), and there was no sex difference between the 2 groups. The most frequent electrophysiological type was acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (55% and 41%) in both groups. Although almost half of the patients in both groups were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), the group of COVID-19 patients required mechanical ventilation more (16.6% vs 0%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Also, the COVID-19 group had more length of ICU stay (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Although some electrophysiological differences were found (acute motor axonal neuropathy was more frequent in the non-COVID-19 group), The analysis did not show any difference in the response to treatment scores based on Phenotype, type of treatment, or electrophysiological pattern between the 2 groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GBS in COVID-19 patients may have different manifestations and electrophysiological patterns, but the response to treatment and in-hospital prognosis were not different compared with GBS in non-COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"39 ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has caused significant health and social impacts worldwide. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, can lead to neurological symptoms, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This study aimed to compare the clinical manifestations, electrophysiological characteristics, degree of disability, and treatment outcomes of GBS patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19-related GBS) with GBS patients without COVID-19.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of GBS patients with a history of COVID-19. A total of 60 patients with GBS and a history of COVID-19 were included in the COVID-19 group, while 56 patients with GBS without COVID-19 were included in the control group. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic data were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: The COVID-19 patients were older (56.2 ± 16.8 vs 47.46 ± 19.25; P = 0.01), and there was no sex difference between the 2 groups. The most frequent electrophysiological type was acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (55% and 41%) in both groups. Although almost half of the patients in both groups were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), the group of COVID-19 patients required mechanical ventilation more (16.6% vs 0%; P < 0.001). Also, the COVID-19 group had more length of ICU stay (P < 0.001). Although some electrophysiological differences were found (acute motor axonal neuropathy was more frequent in the non-COVID-19 group), The analysis did not show any difference in the response to treatment scores based on Phenotype, type of treatment, or electrophysiological pattern between the 2 groups of patients.

Conclusion: GBS in COVID-19 patients may have different manifestations and electrophysiological patterns, but the response to treatment and in-hospital prognosis were not different compared with GBS in non-COVID-19 patients.

covid -19相关格林-巴利综合征与非covid -19患者治疗反应及院内预后的评价与比较
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情在全球范围内造成了重大的健康和社会影响。严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型是导致COVID-19的病毒,可导致神经系统症状,包括格林-巴罗综合征(GBS)。本研究旨在比较合并COVID-19的GBS患者(COVID-19相关性GBS)与未合并COVID-19的GBS患者的临床表现、电生理特征、残疾程度及治疗结果。方法:回顾性、横断面、多中心研究合并COVID-19病史的GBS患者的临床特点及预后。将60例伴有COVID-19病史的GBS患者纳入COVID-19组,56例无COVID-19的GBS患者纳入对照组。比较两组患者的人口学、临床、治疗和预后数据。结果:新冠肺炎患者年龄大(56.2±16.8 vs 47.46±19.25);P = 0.01),两组间无性别差异。两组中最常见的电生理类型为急性炎性脱髓鞘性多根神经病变(55%和41%)。尽管两组中几乎有一半的患者住进了重症监护病房(ICU),但COVID-19患者组需要机械通气的比例更高(16.6%对0%;P < 0.001)。此外,COVID-19组ICU住院时间更长(P < 0.001)。虽然发现了一些电生理差异(急性运动轴索神经病在非covid -19组更常见),但分析未显示两组患者对基于表型、治疗类型或电生理模式的治疗评分的反应有任何差异。结论:COVID-19患者的GBS可能有不同的表现和电生理模式,但对治疗的反应和住院预后与非COVID-19患者的GBS没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信