{"title":"Evaluation and Comparison of Treatment Response and In-Hospital Prognosis of COVID-19-Related Guillain-Barre Syndrome with Non-COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Behnaz Ansari, Niloofar Rezaei, Mohsen Kheradmand, Mohammad Amin Najafi, Keivan Basiri","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.39.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has caused significant health and social impacts worldwide. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, can lead to neurological symptoms, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This study aimed to compare the clinical manifestations, electrophysiological characteristics, degree of disability, and treatment outcomes of GBS patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19-related GBS) with GBS patients without COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of GBS patients with a history of COVID-19. A total of 60 patients with GBS and a history of COVID-19 were included in the COVID-19 group, while 56 patients with GBS without COVID-19 were included in the control group. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic data were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The COVID-19 patients were older (56.2 ± 16.8 vs 47.46 ± 19.25; <i>P</i> = 0.01), and there was no sex difference between the 2 groups. The most frequent electrophysiological type was acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (55% and 41%) in both groups. Although almost half of the patients in both groups were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), the group of COVID-19 patients required mechanical ventilation more (16.6% vs 0%; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Also, the COVID-19 group had more length of ICU stay (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Although some electrophysiological differences were found (acute motor axonal neuropathy was more frequent in the non-COVID-19 group), The analysis did not show any difference in the response to treatment scores based on Phenotype, type of treatment, or electrophysiological pattern between the 2 groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GBS in COVID-19 patients may have different manifestations and electrophysiological patterns, but the response to treatment and in-hospital prognosis were not different compared with GBS in non-COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"39 ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has caused significant health and social impacts worldwide. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, can lead to neurological symptoms, including Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This study aimed to compare the clinical manifestations, electrophysiological characteristics, degree of disability, and treatment outcomes of GBS patients with COVID-19 (COVID-19-related GBS) with GBS patients without COVID-19.
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of GBS patients with a history of COVID-19. A total of 60 patients with GBS and a history of COVID-19 were included in the COVID-19 group, while 56 patients with GBS without COVID-19 were included in the control group. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic data were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: The COVID-19 patients were older (56.2 ± 16.8 vs 47.46 ± 19.25; P = 0.01), and there was no sex difference between the 2 groups. The most frequent electrophysiological type was acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (55% and 41%) in both groups. Although almost half of the patients in both groups were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), the group of COVID-19 patients required mechanical ventilation more (16.6% vs 0%; P < 0.001). Also, the COVID-19 group had more length of ICU stay (P < 0.001). Although some electrophysiological differences were found (acute motor axonal neuropathy was more frequent in the non-COVID-19 group), The analysis did not show any difference in the response to treatment scores based on Phenotype, type of treatment, or electrophysiological pattern between the 2 groups of patients.
Conclusion: GBS in COVID-19 patients may have different manifestations and electrophysiological patterns, but the response to treatment and in-hospital prognosis were not different compared with GBS in non-COVID-19 patients.