Establishing a core outcome set to evaluate the effects of power training in older adults: A Delphi study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-08 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2025.2516178
Mohamed El Hadouchi, Jaap van Dieën, Francois Maissan, Timon Eskes, Cindy Veenhof, Henri Kiers
{"title":"Establishing a core outcome set to evaluate the effects of power training in older adults: A Delphi study.","authors":"Mohamed El Hadouchi, Jaap van Dieën, Francois Maissan, Timon Eskes, Cindy Veenhof, Henri Kiers","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2516178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies evaluating the effects of power training in older adults use a variety of measurement tools and outcome parameters, limiting comparability of results and calling the validity of conclusions into question. This study aimed to identify a core outcome set (COS) to measure the effects of power training in older adults, encompassing the function, activities, and participation domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disease, and Health (ICF). Twenty-one tests were evaluated based on their ability to measure muscle power and the effects of power training. Our methodology consisted of two Delphi survey rounds and an expert panel meeting using modified Nominal Group Technique. The COS consisted of tests considered most feasible for clinical practice and least burdensome for older adults. The COS included the Squat Jump Test (paired with accelerometery-based instrumentation) and the Timed Up-and-Go Test for the function and function and activities domain, respectively. No test was identified for the participation domain, however, experts proposed using daily-life accelerometery until more suitable outcome measures are defined and validated. This study addresses a critical research gap in standardised assessment protocols, and contributes to a multifaceted approach to measuring the impact of power training in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1616-1628"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2516178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies evaluating the effects of power training in older adults use a variety of measurement tools and outcome parameters, limiting comparability of results and calling the validity of conclusions into question. This study aimed to identify a core outcome set (COS) to measure the effects of power training in older adults, encompassing the function, activities, and participation domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disease, and Health (ICF). Twenty-one tests were evaluated based on their ability to measure muscle power and the effects of power training. Our methodology consisted of two Delphi survey rounds and an expert panel meeting using modified Nominal Group Technique. The COS consisted of tests considered most feasible for clinical practice and least burdensome for older adults. The COS included the Squat Jump Test (paired with accelerometery-based instrumentation) and the Timed Up-and-Go Test for the function and function and activities domain, respectively. No test was identified for the participation domain, however, experts proposed using daily-life accelerometery until more suitable outcome measures are defined and validated. This study addresses a critical research gap in standardised assessment protocols, and contributes to a multifaceted approach to measuring the impact of power training in older adults.

建立一个核心结果集来评估老年人力量训练的效果:德尔菲研究。
评估老年人力量训练效果的研究使用了各种测量工具和结果参数,限制了结果的可比性,并使结论的有效性受到质疑。本研究旨在确定一个核心结果集(COS)来衡量老年人力量训练的效果,包括国际功能、疾病和健康分类(ICF)的功能、活动和参与领域。根据他们测量肌肉力量的能力和力量训练的效果对21项测试进行了评估。我们的方法包括两轮德尔菲调查和一次专家小组会议,使用改进的名义小组技术。COS包括被认为对临床实践最可行、对老年人负担最小的测试。COS包括深蹲跳跃测试(与基于加速度计的仪器配对)和计时起跳测试,分别用于功能和功能与活动领域。没有确定参与领域的测试,然而,专家建议使用日常生活加速计,直到更合适的结果测量被定义和验证。本研究解决了标准化评估方案的一个关键研究缺口,并有助于从多方面衡量老年人力量训练的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信