Clinical efficacy and complications of 10 surgical interventions for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Xiao Chen, Yuanhe Fan, Jie Chen, Hongliang Tu
{"title":"Clinical efficacy and complications of 10 surgical interventions for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiao Chen, Yuanhe Fan, Jie Chen, Hongliang Tu","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05878-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal surgical techniques for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remain controversial due to insufficient high-level evidence. We investigated the following surgical approaches for cervical OPLL: anterior decompression and fusion (ADF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF), anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior decompression with instrumented fusion (PDIF), posterior decompression and fusion (PDF), laminectomy (LC), laminoplasty (LP), laminectomy with fusion (LF), and vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from database inception through October 30, 2024. Our search identified both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials compar ing the following surgical interventions: ACDF, ADF, ACCF, ACAF, PDIF, PDF, LC, LP, LF, and VBSO. The extracted data were subjected to network meta-analysis. Our analysis included the following outcome measures: Patient demographic characteristics, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA improvement rates, overall complication rates, excellent/good recovery rates, cervical lordosis characteristics, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our analysis of 50 studies involving 8705 patients, ACAF demonstrated the most significant improvements in JOA scores, cervical lordosis, VAS scores, and NDI scores. ADF showed the greatest increase in JOA improvement rate, while VBSO had the highest rate of excellent and good postoperative recovery. ACDF was associated with the fewest total complications and the shortest surgical duration. Finally, LC resulted in the lowest intraoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This studies demonstrate that ACAF significantly improves JOA scores and cervical lordosis while reducing VAS and NDI scores. Additionally, it achieves higher postoperative JOA improvement rates and excellent/good recovery rates, with fewer total complications and reduced intraoperative blood loss. Based on these findings, ACAF can be one of the preferred options for clinicians treating cervical OPLL, but it requires high surgical experience and strict indication selection. Additionally, the surgical team need to develop the best surgical plan based on imaging features and patient functional needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05878-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal surgical techniques for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remain controversial due to insufficient high-level evidence. We investigated the following surgical approaches for cervical OPLL: anterior decompression and fusion (ADF), anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (ACAF), anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior decompression with instrumented fusion (PDIF), posterior decompression and fusion (PDF), laminectomy (LC), laminoplasty (LP), laminectomy with fusion (LF), and vertebral body sliding osteotomy (VBSO).

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from database inception through October 30, 2024. Our search identified both randomized and non-randomized controlled trials compar ing the following surgical interventions: ACDF, ADF, ACCF, ACAF, PDIF, PDF, LC, LP, LF, and VBSO. The extracted data were subjected to network meta-analysis. Our analysis included the following outcome measures: Patient demographic characteristics, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, JOA improvement rates, overall complication rates, excellent/good recovery rates, cervical lordosis characteristics, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss.

Results: In our analysis of 50 studies involving 8705 patients, ACAF demonstrated the most significant improvements in JOA scores, cervical lordosis, VAS scores, and NDI scores. ADF showed the greatest increase in JOA improvement rate, while VBSO had the highest rate of excellent and good postoperative recovery. ACDF was associated with the fewest total complications and the shortest surgical duration. Finally, LC resulted in the lowest intraoperative blood loss.

Conclusion: This studies demonstrate that ACAF significantly improves JOA scores and cervical lordosis while reducing VAS and NDI scores. Additionally, it achieves higher postoperative JOA improvement rates and excellent/good recovery rates, with fewer total complications and reduced intraoperative blood loss. Based on these findings, ACAF can be one of the preferred options for clinicians treating cervical OPLL, but it requires high surgical experience and strict indication selection. Additionally, the surgical team need to develop the best surgical plan based on imaging features and patient functional needs.

10种手术干预治疗后纵韧带颈椎骨化的临床疗效和并发症:一项最新的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:由于缺乏高水平的证据,治疗后纵韧带颈椎骨化的最佳手术技术仍然存在争议。我们研究了颈椎OPLL的以下手术入路:前路减压融合(ADF)、颈椎前路椎体切除术融合(ACCF)、前路可控前移位融合(ACAF)、颈椎前路椎间盘切除术融合(ACDF)、后路减压融合(PDIF)、后路减压融合(PDF)、椎板切除术(LC)、椎板成形术(LP)、椎板切除术融合(LF)和椎体滑动截骨(VBSO)。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Ovid、Cochrane Library和Web of Science从数据库建立到2024年10月30日。我们检索了比较以下手术干预的随机和非随机对照试验:ACDF、ADF、ACCF、ACAF、PDIF、PDF、LC、LP、LF和VBSO。提取的数据进行网络荟萃分析。我们的分析包括以下结局指标:患者人口统计学特征、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、JOA改善率、总并发症发生率、优良率、颈椎前凸特征、视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、颈部残疾指数(NDI)评分、手术时间和术中出血量。结果:在我们对涉及8705例患者的50项研究的分析中,ACAF在JOA评分、颈椎前凸、VAS评分和NDI评分方面表现出最显著的改善。ADF组JOA改善率提高最大,而VBSO组术后优良率最高。ACDF的总并发症最少,手术时间最短。最后,LC术中出血量最小。结论:本研究表明,ACAF可显著改善JOA评分和颈椎前凸,降低VAS和NDI评分。此外,术后JOA改善率较高,恢复良好,总并发症少,术中出血量减少。基于这些发现,ACAF可作为临床医生治疗颈椎OPLL的首选方案之一,但需要较高的手术经验和严格的适应证选择。此外,外科团队需要根据影像学特征和患者功能需求制定最佳手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信