Long-term results of cervical disc arthroplasty: a single-center retrospective study with a minimum 10-year follow-up.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Junbo He, Yaling Li, Yiwei Shen, Xingjin Wang, Lu Yan, Tingkui Wu, Chen Ding, Hao Liu
{"title":"Long-term results of cervical disc arthroplasty: a single-center retrospective study with a minimum 10-year follow-up.","authors":"Junbo He, Yaling Li, Yiwei Shen, Xingjin Wang, Lu Yan, Tingkui Wu, Chen Ding, Hao Liu","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.SPINE241185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 74 patients who underwent single- or two-level CDA between November 2004 and December 2013, with a minimum 10-year follow-up (22 in the Bryan disc group and 52 in the Prestige LP disc group). Patient-reported outcomes and radiological parameters were collected for comparisons. Additionally, the incidences of heterotopic ossification (HO), adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), prosthesis subsidence, and segmental kyphosis at the final follow-up were evaluated and analyzed. A 95% confidence interval (CI) for a mean difference or odds ratio (OR) was used for all general statistical calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 10 years of follow-up, patients with CDA continued to show significant improvement from baseline in patient-reported outcomes (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the two groups. However, the Bryan disc group had significantly higher global range of motion (ROM; 95% CI 4.8°-19.2°, p = 0.001) and segmental ROM (95% CI 1.3°-5.9°, p = 0.003) compared to the Prestige LP disc group. At 10 years postoperatively, the incidence of HO was 69.2%, including 29.7% ROM-limiting HO. The incidence of ASD was 55.4%. Segmental kyphosis was observed in 10 patients, with a 20.8% incidence in the Bryan disc group and an 8.1% incidence in the Prestige LP disc group (p = 0.072). In the univariate subgroup analysis, the age of the ASD group was significantly higher (95% CI 0.3-6.8, p = 0.034). However, no statistically significant parameters were identified between the HO and non-HO groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through at least 10 years of follow-up, CDA can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes while effectively preserving segmental mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.SPINE241185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).

Methods: This study included 74 patients who underwent single- or two-level CDA between November 2004 and December 2013, with a minimum 10-year follow-up (22 in the Bryan disc group and 52 in the Prestige LP disc group). Patient-reported outcomes and radiological parameters were collected for comparisons. Additionally, the incidences of heterotopic ossification (HO), adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), prosthesis subsidence, and segmental kyphosis at the final follow-up were evaluated and analyzed. A 95% confidence interval (CI) for a mean difference or odds ratio (OR) was used for all general statistical calculations.

Results: After 10 years of follow-up, patients with CDA continued to show significant improvement from baseline in patient-reported outcomes (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the two groups. However, the Bryan disc group had significantly higher global range of motion (ROM; 95% CI 4.8°-19.2°, p = 0.001) and segmental ROM (95% CI 1.3°-5.9°, p = 0.003) compared to the Prestige LP disc group. At 10 years postoperatively, the incidence of HO was 69.2%, including 29.7% ROM-limiting HO. The incidence of ASD was 55.4%. Segmental kyphosis was observed in 10 patients, with a 20.8% incidence in the Bryan disc group and an 8.1% incidence in the Prestige LP disc group (p = 0.072). In the univariate subgroup analysis, the age of the ASD group was significantly higher (95% CI 0.3-6.8, p = 0.034). However, no statistically significant parameters were identified between the HO and non-HO groups.

Conclusions: Through at least 10 years of follow-up, CDA can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes while effectively preserving segmental mobility.

颈椎间盘置换术的长期结果:一项至少10年随访的单中心回顾性研究。
目的:本研究旨在回顾性评价颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)后的长期临床和影像学结果。方法:本研究纳入了2004年11月至2013年12月期间接受单级或双级CDA的74例患者,随访时间至少为10年(Bryan椎间盘组22例,Prestige LP椎间盘组52例)。收集患者报告的结果和放射学参数进行比较。此外,评估和分析最后随访时异位骨化(HO)、邻近节段退变(ASD)、假体下沉和节段性后凸的发生率。所有一般统计计算均使用95%置信区间(CI)表示平均差异或比值比(or)。结果:经过10年的随访,CDA患者报告的结果继续显示较基线有显著改善(p < 0.001),两组之间无显著差异。然而,布莱恩椎间盘组的整体活动范围(ROM;95% CI 4.8°-19.2°,p = 0.001)和节段性ROM (95% CI 1.3°-5.9°,p = 0.003)。术后10年,HO发生率为69.2%,其中rom限制性HO发生率为29.7%。ASD的发生率为55.4%。10例患者出现节段性后凸,其中Bryan椎间盘组发生率为20.8%,Prestige LP椎间盘组发生率为8.1% (p = 0.072)。在单变量亚组分析中,ASD组的年龄显著高于ASD组(95% CI 0.3-6.8, p = 0.034)。然而,HO组和非HO组之间没有统计学意义的参数。结论:通过至少10年的随访,CDA在有效保持节段活动能力的同时取得了满意的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信