Provider attitudes and perspectives on rehabilitation for pediatric cancer patients.

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Maria C Swartz, Eduardo Gonzalez Villarreal, Keri Schadler, Donna Kelly, Alakh P Rajan, Clark Andersen, Shiming Zhang, Stephanie J Wells, Amy Heaton, Karen M Moody
{"title":"Provider attitudes and perspectives on rehabilitation for pediatric cancer patients.","authors":"Maria C Swartz, Eduardo Gonzalez Villarreal, Keri Schadler, Donna Kelly, Alakh P Rajan, Clark Andersen, Shiming Zhang, Stephanie J Wells, Amy Heaton, Karen M Moody","doi":"10.1177/18758894251341150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTwenty percent of childhood cancer survivors experience physical function impairments, and ∼75% develop a chronic health condition. Physical and occupational therapists (PT/OTs) can mitigate these late effects, yet few children receive cancer rehabilitation (CR). This research aimed to identify provider attitudes and perspectives towards CR services for children across inpatient and outpatient settings at a cancer center.MethodsThree cardiac rehabilitation instruments were adapted to evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding CR delivery. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant survey results.ResultsTwenty administrators, 20 physicians/advanced practice providers (APPs), and 20 PT/OTs completed surveys. All disciplines strongly agreed on the value of CR for patient outcomes and care quality. Barriers to CR access included insurance models that disincentivize healthcare systems from providing CR, lack of a standardized screening and referral process, and inconsistent patient participation. Physicians/APPs (81%) endorsed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to promote CR referrals, and 90% of PT/OTs agreed hybrid CR delivery, which includes both supervised and unsupervised exercise, would increase patient participation.ConclusionThis study identified opportunities to increase CR access for childhood cancer survivors, including CPGs, streamlining referral processes, hybrid CR delivery, and closing insurance gaps. Future research should address these factors to improve CR access and ultimately improve outcomes for pediatric survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"18758894251341150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18758894251341150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTwenty percent of childhood cancer survivors experience physical function impairments, and ∼75% develop a chronic health condition. Physical and occupational therapists (PT/OTs) can mitigate these late effects, yet few children receive cancer rehabilitation (CR). This research aimed to identify provider attitudes and perspectives towards CR services for children across inpatient and outpatient settings at a cancer center.MethodsThree cardiac rehabilitation instruments were adapted to evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding CR delivery. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant survey results.ResultsTwenty administrators, 20 physicians/advanced practice providers (APPs), and 20 PT/OTs completed surveys. All disciplines strongly agreed on the value of CR for patient outcomes and care quality. Barriers to CR access included insurance models that disincentivize healthcare systems from providing CR, lack of a standardized screening and referral process, and inconsistent patient participation. Physicians/APPs (81%) endorsed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to promote CR referrals, and 90% of PT/OTs agreed hybrid CR delivery, which includes both supervised and unsupervised exercise, would increase patient participation.ConclusionThis study identified opportunities to increase CR access for childhood cancer survivors, including CPGs, streamlining referral processes, hybrid CR delivery, and closing insurance gaps. Future research should address these factors to improve CR access and ultimately improve outcomes for pediatric survivors.

提供者对儿童癌症患者康复的态度和观点。
目的:20%的儿童癌症幸存者经历身体功能障碍,约75%发展为慢性健康状况。物理和职业治疗师(PT/OTs)可以减轻这些后期影响,但很少有儿童接受癌症康复(CR)。本研究旨在确定在癌症中心的住院和门诊设置的儿童CR服务提供者的态度和观点。方法采用三种心脏康复工具评估患者对CR交付的认知、态度和感知。采用描述性统计对参与者调查结果进行汇总。结果20名管理人员、20名医生/高级执业医师(app)和20名PT/ ot完成了问卷调查。所有学科都强烈认同CR对患者预后和护理质量的价值。获得CR的障碍包括阻碍医疗保健系统提供CR的保险模式、缺乏标准化的筛查和转诊流程以及患者参与不一致。81%的医生/ app支持临床实践指南(cpg)来促进CR转诊,90%的PT/ ot同意混合CR交付,包括监督和无监督的锻炼,将增加患者的参与。本研究确定了增加儿童癌症幸存者获得CR的机会,包括cpg、简化转诊流程、混合CR交付和缩小保险差距。未来的研究应该解决这些因素,以改善CR的获取,并最终改善儿科幸存者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
139
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信