Short-Segment Fixation with Anterior Support versus Long-Segment Fixation with Separation Surgery for Thoracolumbar Spinal Metastatic Tumors : A Comparative Analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Younggyu Oh, Subum Lee, Jinuk Kim, Seo Eun Kim, Jae Hwan Cho, Jin Hoon Park
{"title":"Short-Segment Fixation with Anterior Support versus Long-Segment Fixation with Separation Surgery for Thoracolumbar Spinal Metastatic Tumors : A Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Younggyu Oh, Subum Lee, Jinuk Kim, Seo Eun Kim, Jae Hwan Cho, Jin Hoon Park","doi":"10.3340/jkns.2024.0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with metastatic spinal tumors who underwent either short-segment fixation with anterior support or long-segment fixation with a separation surgery in the thoracic or lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who were treated surgically for spinal metastases in the thoracic or lumbar spine at a single tertiary referral center between April 2014 and December 2022. Surgical treatments included spinal cord decompression, short-segment fixation with maximal circumferential debulking of the lytic tumor portion and anterior support, or long-segment fixation without anterior support, followed by separation surgery and posterolateral fusion. We compared the two fixation strategies based on patient demographics, preoperative diagnoses, surgical data, neurological assessments, and changes in segmental Cobb angles immediately after surgery, and at the final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 91 patients were included (short-segment = 44, long-segment = 47). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding age, sex, comorbidities, primary cancer location, postoperative complications, or reoperation rates. Furthermore, no significant differences in the sagittal Cobb angles, including global angle (thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis) and segmental angle were noted from the preop to the final follow-up. Compared to traditional long-segment fixation, short-segment fixation with anterior support significantly improved neurological outcomes in the thoracic region and reduced the length of hospital stay. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding complications or other clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-segment fixation is comparable to long-segment fixation in the management of thoracolumbar metastatic spinal tumors, with no significant differences in radiographic outcomes. However, short-segment fixation provides the added advantages of improved neurological outcomes in the thoracic region and shorter hospital stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":16283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2024.0208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with metastatic spinal tumors who underwent either short-segment fixation with anterior support or long-segment fixation with a separation surgery in the thoracic or lumbar spine.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who were treated surgically for spinal metastases in the thoracic or lumbar spine at a single tertiary referral center between April 2014 and December 2022. Surgical treatments included spinal cord decompression, short-segment fixation with maximal circumferential debulking of the lytic tumor portion and anterior support, or long-segment fixation without anterior support, followed by separation surgery and posterolateral fusion. We compared the two fixation strategies based on patient demographics, preoperative diagnoses, surgical data, neurological assessments, and changes in segmental Cobb angles immediately after surgery, and at the final follow-up.

Results: A total of 91 patients were included (short-segment = 44, long-segment = 47). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding age, sex, comorbidities, primary cancer location, postoperative complications, or reoperation rates. Furthermore, no significant differences in the sagittal Cobb angles, including global angle (thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis) and segmental angle were noted from the preop to the final follow-up. Compared to traditional long-segment fixation, short-segment fixation with anterior support significantly improved neurological outcomes in the thoracic region and reduced the length of hospital stay. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding complications or other clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: Short-segment fixation is comparable to long-segment fixation in the management of thoracolumbar metastatic spinal tumors, with no significant differences in radiographic outcomes. However, short-segment fixation provides the added advantages of improved neurological outcomes in the thoracic region and shorter hospital stays.

短节段与长节段固定治疗胸腰椎转移性肿瘤的临床和放射学结果:回顾性比较分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估和比较接受前路支持短节段固定或胸椎或腰椎分离手术长节段固定的转移性脊柱肿瘤患者的临床和影像学结果。方法:我们对2014年4月至2022年12月在单一三级转诊中心接受手术治疗的胸椎或腰椎脊柱转移的成年患者进行了回顾性分析。手术治疗包括脊髓减压、短节段内固定和前路支持,或无前路支持的长节段内固定,然后进行分离手术和后外侧融合。我们根据患者人口统计学、术前诊断、手术数据、神经学评估、手术后和最后随访时节段Cobb角的变化,比较了两种固定策略。结果:共纳入91例患者(短节段44例,长节段47例)。两组在年龄、性别、合并症、原发肿瘤位置、术后并发症或再手术率方面无显著差异。此外,从术前到最终随访,矢状Cobb角,包括全局角(胸后凸、腰椎前凸)和节段角均无显著差异。与传统的长节段固定相比,前路支持的短节段固定显著改善了胸椎区的神经预后,缩短了住院时间。两组在并发症或其他临床结果方面无显著差异。结论:短节段内固定与长节段内固定在治疗胸腰椎转移性脊柱肿瘤方面具有可比性,影像学结果无显著差异。然而,短节段固定提供了改善胸区神经预后和缩短住院时间的额外优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (J Korean Neurosurg Soc) is the official journal of the Korean Neurosurgical Society, and published bimonthly (1st day of January, March, May, July, September, and November). It launched in October 31, 1972 with Volume 1 and Number 1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc aims to allow neurosurgeons from around the world to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism. This journal publishes Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports, Technical Notes, and Letters to the Editor. Our field of interest involves clinical neurosurgery (cerebrovascular disease, neuro-oncology, skull base neurosurgery, spine, pediatric neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, epilepsy, neuro-trauma, and peripheral nerve disease) and laboratory work in neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信