Ureteral Stricture Occurrence after Transmural Ureteroscopic Ureteral Injury: A Previously Undocumented Concern.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Andrei D Cumpanas, Seyed Amiryaghoub M Lavasani, Jaime Altamirano-Villarroel, Seyedamirvala Saadat, Jacob C Tsai, Brandon Camp, Jaylen M Lee, Marissa Ericson, Bruce M Gao, Zachary E Tano, Pengbo Jiang, Roshan M Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V Clayman
{"title":"Ureteral Stricture Occurrence after Transmural Ureteroscopic Ureteral Injury: A Previously Undocumented Concern.","authors":"Andrei D Cumpanas, Seyed Amiryaghoub M Lavasani, Jaime Altamirano-Villarroel, Seyedamirvala Saadat, Jacob C Tsai, Brandon Camp, Jaylen M Lee, Marissa Ericson, Bruce M Gao, Zachary E Tano, Pengbo Jiang, Roshan M Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V Clayman","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Take Home Message:</i></b> Ureteral stricture risk rises exponentially with the depth of the ureteral injury. Indeed, when superficial or transmural ureteral splitting occurred, the odds of developing a <i>de novo</i> stricture rose by 13- and 40-fold, respectively. <b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Although the reported incidence of ureteral strictures following ureteroscopy (URS) is low (0.3%-3%), we hypothesize the risk may rise as the depth of ureteral injury increases. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Between 2018 and 2022, 550 patients underwent URS for upper tract calculi; each of these patients had a postureteroscopic lesion scale (PULS) grading and follow-up imaging 3-6 months after a surgical procedure. Patients with preexisting strictures, or strictures formed at the site of an impacted stone, were excluded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> With a median follow-up of 23 months, <i>de novo</i> stricture rates for the 550 patients were 0.73% (4/550). More specifically, while strictures among patients with PULS 0 and 1 were minimal, 0% (0/235) and 0.48% (1/208), respectively. However, the stricture rate increased to 1.1% (1/92) for PULS 2 and jumped to 13.3% (2/15) among those patients with PULS 3 injuries. On a Firth penalized logistic regression analysis, we found that when urothelial splitting (i.e., PULS 2 or higher) or periureteral fat (i.e., a PULS 3 transmural injury) was visualized, the odds of developing a stricture were 13 and 40 times higher, respectively. Based on these findings, we sought to simplify the existing ureteral injury grades and improve ureteral stricture prognostication by creating a novel dichotomous injury scale. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Iatrogenic ureteral stricture rates rose sharply when ureteral wall integrity was disrupted. This was most notable for a transmural injury, which resulted in a stricture rate of 13.3% (2/15 patients). Using a simplified two-stage scoring system (University of California, Irvine [UCI] 0, 1, or 2), clinicians may be better able to identify patients (i.e., UCI 2) at high risk for post-URS stricture formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0702","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Take Home Message: Ureteral stricture risk rises exponentially with the depth of the ureteral injury. Indeed, when superficial or transmural ureteral splitting occurred, the odds of developing a de novo stricture rose by 13- and 40-fold, respectively. Purpose: Although the reported incidence of ureteral strictures following ureteroscopy (URS) is low (0.3%-3%), we hypothesize the risk may rise as the depth of ureteral injury increases. Materials and Methods: Between 2018 and 2022, 550 patients underwent URS for upper tract calculi; each of these patients had a postureteroscopic lesion scale (PULS) grading and follow-up imaging 3-6 months after a surgical procedure. Patients with preexisting strictures, or strictures formed at the site of an impacted stone, were excluded. Results: With a median follow-up of 23 months, de novo stricture rates for the 550 patients were 0.73% (4/550). More specifically, while strictures among patients with PULS 0 and 1 were minimal, 0% (0/235) and 0.48% (1/208), respectively. However, the stricture rate increased to 1.1% (1/92) for PULS 2 and jumped to 13.3% (2/15) among those patients with PULS 3 injuries. On a Firth penalized logistic regression analysis, we found that when urothelial splitting (i.e., PULS 2 or higher) or periureteral fat (i.e., a PULS 3 transmural injury) was visualized, the odds of developing a stricture were 13 and 40 times higher, respectively. Based on these findings, we sought to simplify the existing ureteral injury grades and improve ureteral stricture prognostication by creating a novel dichotomous injury scale. Conclusions: Iatrogenic ureteral stricture rates rose sharply when ureteral wall integrity was disrupted. This was most notable for a transmural injury, which resulted in a stricture rate of 13.3% (2/15 patients). Using a simplified two-stage scoring system (University of California, Irvine [UCI] 0, 1, or 2), clinicians may be better able to identify patients (i.e., UCI 2) at high risk for post-URS stricture formation.

经壁输尿管镜输尿管损伤后输尿管狭窄的发生:一个以前没有记录的问题。
关键信息:输尿管狭窄的风险随着输尿管损伤的深度呈指数增长。事实上,当发生浅表或经壁输尿管撕裂时,发生新发狭窄的几率分别增加了13倍和40倍。目的:虽然报道的输尿管镜(URS)术后输尿管狭窄的发生率很低(0.3%-3%),但我们假设随着输尿管损伤深度的增加,风险可能会上升。材料与方法:2018年至2022年,550例患者因上尿路结石接受尿路重建;这些患者在手术后3-6个月进行了子宫后视镜病变分级(PULS)和随访成像。先前存在狭窄或在阻生结石部位形成狭窄的患者被排除在外。结果:中位随访23个月,550例患者的新发狭窄率为0.73%(4/550)。更具体地说,而PULS 0和1患者的狭窄最小,分别为0%(0/235)和0.48%(1/208)。然而,在PULS 2损伤患者中,狭窄率上升至1.1%(1/92),而在PULS 3损伤患者中,狭窄率上升至13.3%(2/15)。在Firth惩罚逻辑回归分析中,我们发现,当尿路上皮分裂(即PULS 2或更高)或输尿管周围脂肪(即PULS 3跨壁损伤)可视化时,发生狭窄的几率分别高出13倍和40倍。基于这些发现,我们试图通过创建一种新的二分损伤量表来简化现有的输尿管损伤等级,并改善输尿管狭窄的预后。结论:当输尿管壁完整性被破坏时,医源性输尿管狭窄发生率急剧上升。这在跨壁损伤中最为明显,其狭窄率为13.3%(2/15例)。使用简化的两阶段评分系统(University of California, Irvine [UCI] 0、1或2),临床医生可以更好地识别患者(即UCI 2)在尿urs后狭窄形成的高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信