Dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc® Blue, One Reci®, R-Motion®, and two Replica-Like endodontic files after autoclave sterilisation and/or immersion in sodium hypochlorite: A comparative in vitro study.

Q2 Dentistry
Néstor Ríos-Osorio, Sandra Briñez-Rodríguez, Rafael Fernández-Grisales, Juan Triana-Correa, Anthony Pushaina-Velásquez, Hernán García-Restrepo, David Betancur-Calle, Camilo Meza-Meza, Adriana Tapia-Sierra, Carolina Berruecos, José Sierra-Sánchez
{"title":"Dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc® Blue, One Reci®, R-Motion®, and two Replica-Like endodontic files after autoclave sterilisation and/or immersion in sodium hypochlorite: A comparative <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Néstor Ríos-Osorio, Sandra Briñez-Rodríguez, Rafael Fernández-Grisales, Juan Triana-Correa, Anthony Pushaina-Velásquez, Hernán García-Restrepo, David Betancur-Calle, Camilo Meza-Meza, Adriana Tapia-Sierra, Carolina Berruecos, José Sierra-Sánchez","doi":"10.4317/jced.62529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance (CFR) of Reciproc® Blue (RB), One Reci® (OR), R-Motion® (RM), Roll Wave Gold (RW) and RCS Blue T (RCS B-T) instruments.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>525 files (105 RB (25/0.08), 105 OR (25/0.06), 105 RM (25/0.06), 105 Wave Roll (25/0.07) and 105 RCS Blue T (25/0.06) were assigned into 7 groups (n =15) for each brand. Group 0: Instruments were not exposed to NaOCl or sterilization. Groups 1 and 4: instruments were exposed to 5% NaOCl 1 and 3 times, respectively. Groups 2 and 5: instruments were sterilized 1 and 3 times, respectively. Groups 3 and 6: Instruments were exposed to both, NaOCl and sterilization 1 and 3 times, respectively. Subsequently, files underwent a dynamic CFR test. The chemical composition of the files' surfaces from Group 0 was determined using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Cyclic fatigue resistance time was statistically analysed using 1-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Post hoc multiple range analysis applying Tukey's test and the Games-Howell test was conducted to assess significant differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater CFR values were observed in the RB instruments, followed by the RM, OR, RW and RCS B-T files, respectively (<i>p</i><0.05). No significant differences were observed among RM, OR and RW files (<i>p</i>>0.05). The lowest CFR values were observed in the RCS B-T files(<i>p</i><0.05). The CFR of RB, RM, and OR decreased when the instruments were autoclaved and immersed in 5% NaOCl (<i>p</i>>0.05) (3 times) compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RB displayed the best CFR values. The RB, RM and OR instruments were more vulnerable to the repeated cycles of NaOCl immersion combined with autoclave sterilisation. The high density of microstructural defects on the surface of RW and RCS B-T instruments, caused by a lack of quality control, makes their biomechanical behaviour unpredictable. <b>Key words:</b>Dynamic cyclic fatigue, nickel-titanium, autoclave sterilisation, sodium hypochlorite, Replica-Like endodontic files.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 5","pages":"e542-e551"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To compare the cyclic fatigue resistance (CFR) of Reciproc® Blue (RB), One Reci® (OR), R-Motion® (RM), Roll Wave Gold (RW) and RCS Blue T (RCS B-T) instruments.

Material and methods: 525 files (105 RB (25/0.08), 105 OR (25/0.06), 105 RM (25/0.06), 105 Wave Roll (25/0.07) and 105 RCS Blue T (25/0.06) were assigned into 7 groups (n =15) for each brand. Group 0: Instruments were not exposed to NaOCl or sterilization. Groups 1 and 4: instruments were exposed to 5% NaOCl 1 and 3 times, respectively. Groups 2 and 5: instruments were sterilized 1 and 3 times, respectively. Groups 3 and 6: Instruments were exposed to both, NaOCl and sterilization 1 and 3 times, respectively. Subsequently, files underwent a dynamic CFR test. The chemical composition of the files' surfaces from Group 0 was determined using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Cyclic fatigue resistance time was statistically analysed using 1-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Post hoc multiple range analysis applying Tukey's test and the Games-Howell test was conducted to assess significant differences.

Results: Greater CFR values were observed in the RB instruments, followed by the RM, OR, RW and RCS B-T files, respectively (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed among RM, OR and RW files (p>0.05). The lowest CFR values were observed in the RCS B-T files(p<0.05). The CFR of RB, RM, and OR decreased when the instruments were autoclaved and immersed in 5% NaOCl (p>0.05) (3 times) compared with the control group.

Conclusions: The RB displayed the best CFR values. The RB, RM and OR instruments were more vulnerable to the repeated cycles of NaOCl immersion combined with autoclave sterilisation. The high density of microstructural defects on the surface of RW and RCS B-T instruments, caused by a lack of quality control, makes their biomechanical behaviour unpredictable. Key words:Dynamic cyclic fatigue, nickel-titanium, autoclave sterilisation, sodium hypochlorite, Replica-Like endodontic files.

recproc®Blue、One Reci®、R-Motion®和两个Replica-Like根管锉在高压釜灭菌和/或次氯酸钠浸泡后的动态循环疲劳抗性:一项体外比较研究
背景:比较Reciproc®Blue (RB)、One Reci®(OR)、R-Motion®(RM)、Roll Wave Gold (RW)和RCS Blue T (RCS B-T)仪器的循环疲劳抗力(CFR)。材料与方法:525份文件,其中RB(25/0.08) 105份,OR(25/0.06) 105份,RM(25/0.06) 105份,Wave Roll(25/0.07) 105份,RCS Blue T(25/0.06) 105份,每个品牌分为7组(n =15)。0组:仪器未接触NaOCl或消毒。第1组和第4组:仪器分别接触5% NaOCl 1次和3次。第2组和第5组:器械分别消毒1次和3次。第3组和第6组:仪器分别暴露于NaOCl和灭菌1次和3次。随后,对文件进行动态CFR测试。利用能量色散x射线光谱(EDS)测定了0组锉表面的化学成分。采用单因素方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验对抗疲劳时间进行统计分析。运用Tukey检验和Games-Howell检验进行事后多极差分析以评估显著差异。结果:RB器械CFR值较高,RM、OR、RW、RCS B-T器械CFR值次之(p < 0.05)。与对照组相比,RCS B-T组CFR值最低(p < 0.05)(3次)。结论:RB具有最佳的CFR值。RB, RM和OR仪器更容易受到NaOCl浸泡结合高压灭菌器灭菌的反复循环的影响。由于缺乏质量控制,RW和RCS B-T仪器表面存在高密度的微结构缺陷,使其生物力学行为不可预测。关键词:动态循环疲劳,镍钛,高压釜灭菌,次氯酸钠,仿体根管锉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信