A Descriptive Analysis of the Current State of Peace Officer Standards and Training Physical Fitness Requirements across the USA.

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.70252/WQSL5192
Robert G Lockie, Joseph M Dulla
{"title":"A Descriptive Analysis of the Current State of Peace Officer Standards and Training Physical Fitness Requirements across the USA.","authors":"Robert G Lockie, Joseph M Dulla","doi":"10.70252/WQSL5192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many law enforcement organizations are experiencing recruitment and retention challenges, of which physical fitness can be a factor. The study purpose was to collate information from Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Commission staff in each USA state to document current fitness mandates and policies for recruits/officers. A 10-question survey was allocated to an appropriate representative from every state POST organization. The survey collected information regarding minimum state-mandated fitness standards for academy entry and exit; minimum state-mandated requirements for fitness programming, including safety plans; education/training requirements for fitness training instructors; and minimum state-mandated fitness standards for incumbent officers. The response rate was 98% (49/50 states). Fewer than half of the states mandated: age- and gender-neutral statewide academy entry fitness tests (29%; <i>n</i>=14); ability-based fitness training (24%; <i>n</i>=12); minimum education or formal certifications for fitness training instructors (45%; <i>n</i>=22); statewide collection of fitness (25%; <i>n</i>=12) or injury (45%; <i>n</i>=18) data; a statewide fitness training safety plan (40%; <i>n</i>=19); age- and gender-neutral exit fitness tests for recruits/students (35%; <i>n</i>=17); and officer fitness standards (8%; <i>n</i>=4). Only thirteen states (27%) had an active work group focusing on survey topics. POST Commissions should be proactive in reviewing minimum fitness requirements for academies, and staff should continue and/or expand fitness education. Resources are available for POST Commissions to design/update safety plans and address other findings. Although difficult to mandate fitness standards for officers, they should be provided resources to remain physically active. Implementing these practices via appropriate policies should assist with personnel health and retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 8","pages":"543-560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/WQSL5192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many law enforcement organizations are experiencing recruitment and retention challenges, of which physical fitness can be a factor. The study purpose was to collate information from Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Commission staff in each USA state to document current fitness mandates and policies for recruits/officers. A 10-question survey was allocated to an appropriate representative from every state POST organization. The survey collected information regarding minimum state-mandated fitness standards for academy entry and exit; minimum state-mandated requirements for fitness programming, including safety plans; education/training requirements for fitness training instructors; and minimum state-mandated fitness standards for incumbent officers. The response rate was 98% (49/50 states). Fewer than half of the states mandated: age- and gender-neutral statewide academy entry fitness tests (29%; n=14); ability-based fitness training (24%; n=12); minimum education or formal certifications for fitness training instructors (45%; n=22); statewide collection of fitness (25%; n=12) or injury (45%; n=18) data; a statewide fitness training safety plan (40%; n=19); age- and gender-neutral exit fitness tests for recruits/students (35%; n=17); and officer fitness standards (8%; n=4). Only thirteen states (27%) had an active work group focusing on survey topics. POST Commissions should be proactive in reviewing minimum fitness requirements for academies, and staff should continue and/or expand fitness education. Resources are available for POST Commissions to design/update safety plans and address other findings. Although difficult to mandate fitness standards for officers, they should be provided resources to remain physically active. Implementing these practices via appropriate policies should assist with personnel health and retention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

美国治安官标准和训练体能要求现状的描述性分析。
许多执法机构正在经历招聘和留住人才的挑战,其中身体健康可能是一个因素。研究的目的是整理来自美国各州和平官员标准和培训委员会工作人员的信息,以记录当前新兵/军官的健身要求和政策。向每个州邮政组织的适当代表分配了10个问题的调查问卷。该调查收集了有关国家规定的学院入学和退学的最低健康标准的信息;州对健身项目的最低要求,包括安全计划;健身训练指导员的学历/培训要求;以及国家规定的在职警官的最低健康标准。应答率为98%(49/50个州)。不到一半的州规定:年龄和性别中立的全州学院入学体能测试(29%;n = 14);能力型健身训练(24%;n = 12);健身教练最低学历或正式证书(45%);n = 22);全州范围内的健身收集(25%;N =12)或损伤(45%;n = 18)数据;全州范围的健身训练安全计划(40%;n = 19);对新兵/学生进行不分年龄和性别的退出体能测试(35%;n = 17);官员健康标准(8%;n = 4)。只有13个州(27%)有一个专注于调查主题的活跃工作组。邮政委员会应积极审查学院的最低健身要求,工作人员应继续和(或)扩大健身教育。邮政委员会可获得资源来设计/更新安全计划和处理其他调查结果。虽然很难强制规定官员的健康标准,但应该为他们提供资源,使他们保持体育活动。通过适当的政策实施这些做法应有助于人员的健康和保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信