Physiological and Biomechanical Responses to Indoor Cycling with and without the Ability to Sway.

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.70252/FQRW7720
Alina Swafford, James Navalta, Julia Freedman Silvernail, Nancy Lough, John Mercer
{"title":"Physiological and Biomechanical Responses to Indoor Cycling with and without the Ability to Sway.","authors":"Alina Swafford, James Navalta, Julia Freedman Silvernail, Nancy Lough, John Mercer","doi":"10.70252/FQRW7720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to understand whether or not physiological and biomechanical measures were influenced by cycling sway and intensity. Participants (n=13; 24.9±6.5 years; 1.7±0.1 m; 64.7±11.2 kg) completed two submaximal-effort cycling conditions using a stationary smart bike placed on a rocker board: 1) cycling with the rocker board set to allow sway (unblocked); 2) cycling with blocks placed in the rocker board to prevent sway (blocked). The order conditions were counterbalanced, and each condition was 12-mins. For each condition, four intensity levels were completed. Prior to testing, target power was identified for each Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) level (11, 13, 16, 17). Rate of oxygen consumption (V<sup>·</sup>O<sub>2</sub>; ml·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>) was measured using a metabolic cart (1 sample every 5 sec) along with RPE and heart rate (HR). Cadence, speed, and power were measured via the smart bike interface for each condition. Sway was measured using a custom rotary switch that measured (250 Hz) the angle of the rocker board while cycling. Each dependent variable was compared using a 2 (Condition: blocked, unblocked) x 4 (Intensity) repeated measures ANOVA. For sway, V<sup>·</sup>O<sub>2</sub>, HR, speed, and cadence, there was no interaction between Condition and Intensity (p>0.05). Sway was influenced by the main effect of Condition (p<0.001). V<sup>·</sup>O<sub>2</sub>, HR, and speed were each influenced by the main effect of Intensity (p<0.001). Overall, it was determined that participants did sway when there was the potential to sway; however, physiological or biomechanical measures were not influenced by the ability to sway.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 7","pages":"531-542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/FQRW7720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to understand whether or not physiological and biomechanical measures were influenced by cycling sway and intensity. Participants (n=13; 24.9±6.5 years; 1.7±0.1 m; 64.7±11.2 kg) completed two submaximal-effort cycling conditions using a stationary smart bike placed on a rocker board: 1) cycling with the rocker board set to allow sway (unblocked); 2) cycling with blocks placed in the rocker board to prevent sway (blocked). The order conditions were counterbalanced, and each condition was 12-mins. For each condition, four intensity levels were completed. Prior to testing, target power was identified for each Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) level (11, 13, 16, 17). Rate of oxygen consumption (V·O2; ml·kg-1·min-1) was measured using a metabolic cart (1 sample every 5 sec) along with RPE and heart rate (HR). Cadence, speed, and power were measured via the smart bike interface for each condition. Sway was measured using a custom rotary switch that measured (250 Hz) the angle of the rocker board while cycling. Each dependent variable was compared using a 2 (Condition: blocked, unblocked) x 4 (Intensity) repeated measures ANOVA. For sway, V·O2, HR, speed, and cadence, there was no interaction between Condition and Intensity (p>0.05). Sway was influenced by the main effect of Condition (p<0.001). V·O2, HR, and speed were each influenced by the main effect of Intensity (p<0.001). Overall, it was determined that participants did sway when there was the potential to sway; however, physiological or biomechanical measures were not influenced by the ability to sway.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有或没有摇摆能力的室内自行车的生理和生物力学反应。
本研究的目的是了解生理和生物力学指标是否受到骑行摇摆和强度的影响。参与者(n = 13;24.9±6.5年;1.7±0.1米;64.7±11.2 kg)使用放置在摇臂板上的固定智能自行车完成了两种次最大努力的骑行条件:1)将摇臂板设置为允许摇摆(不受阻碍);2)骑行时用挡块放置在摇臂板上,防止摇摆(挡块)。顺序条件进行平衡,每个条件为12分钟。对于每种情况,完成了四个强度水平。在测试之前,为每个感知消耗等级(RPE)水平(11,13,16,17)确定目标功率。耗氧量(V·O2);ml·kg-1·min-1)使用代谢车(每5秒1个样本)测量RPE和心率(HR)。在每种情况下,通过智能自行车界面测量节奏、速度和功率。摇摆测量使用一个定制的旋转开关,测量(250赫兹)摇摆板的角度,而骑自行车。使用2(条件:阻塞,未阻塞)x 4(强度)重复测量方差分析比较每个因变量。在摇摆、V·O2、心率、速度和节奏方面,状态与强度之间无交互作用(p < 0.05)。摇摆受条件(p·O2)主效应的影响,心率和速度均受强度(p·O2)主效应的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信