Evaluation of Valid VO2max Criteria for Graded Exercise Testing in Cancer Survivors.

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.70252/UKHO9411
Daniel Y K Shackelford, Jessica M Brown, Rhianna N Patel
{"title":"Evaluation of Valid VO<sub>2max</sub> Criteria for Graded Exercise Testing in Cancer Survivors.","authors":"Daniel Y K Shackelford, Jessica M Brown, Rhianna N Patel","doi":"10.70252/UKHO9411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular fitness (VO<sub>2max</sub>) predicts all-cause mortality and is vital to assess in cancer survivors (CS) for individualized exercise prescriptions. Metabolic carts confirm VO<sub>2max</sub> with respiratory exchange ratio (RER) ≥1.10; other VO<sub>2max</sub> criteria include ≤10 beats/minute of maximal predicted heart rate and/or a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of >8 on the Modified Borg Scale. Another suggested criterion is respiratory frequency (Rf) ≥ 40 breaths per minute. These criteria are assumed applicable for all populations, but due to cancer-related toxicities, frequency and validity of traditional VO<sub>2max</sub> criteria usage in CS remains unconfirmed. The purpose was to evaluate the frequency of VO<sub>2max</sub> criterion achievement of RER and alternate maximal criteria using HR, RPE, and Rf in CS. Forty CS performed three graded exercise tests (GXT) using gas analysis, totaling 111 GXTs. Max RER, HR, RPE, and Rf were measured. Differences in successful VO<sub>2max</sub> criterion achievement frequency were assessed using a Cochran's <i>Q</i> test and Pairwise Comparison Dunn test with Bonferroni adjustment. Maximal criteria were successfully met in 84%, 79%, 92%, and 43% of trials when evaluating RER, HR, RPE, and Rf, respectively. Significant differences occurred between Rf and all other measures (p < 0.001); no significant differences occurred between RER, HR, RPE. Traditional VO<sub>2max</sub> criteria may be feasibly obtained and used in CS; HR and RPE are valid alternatives to RER, but Rf is not. The equivalency between RER, RPE, and HR suggests metabolic carts may be unnecessary for CS during maximal testing, increasing accessibility and validity of VO<sub>2max</sub> values.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 5","pages":"443-455"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/UKHO9411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiovascular fitness (VO2max) predicts all-cause mortality and is vital to assess in cancer survivors (CS) for individualized exercise prescriptions. Metabolic carts confirm VO2max with respiratory exchange ratio (RER) ≥1.10; other VO2max criteria include ≤10 beats/minute of maximal predicted heart rate and/or a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of >8 on the Modified Borg Scale. Another suggested criterion is respiratory frequency (Rf) ≥ 40 breaths per minute. These criteria are assumed applicable for all populations, but due to cancer-related toxicities, frequency and validity of traditional VO2max criteria usage in CS remains unconfirmed. The purpose was to evaluate the frequency of VO2max criterion achievement of RER and alternate maximal criteria using HR, RPE, and Rf in CS. Forty CS performed three graded exercise tests (GXT) using gas analysis, totaling 111 GXTs. Max RER, HR, RPE, and Rf were measured. Differences in successful VO2max criterion achievement frequency were assessed using a Cochran's Q test and Pairwise Comparison Dunn test with Bonferroni adjustment. Maximal criteria were successfully met in 84%, 79%, 92%, and 43% of trials when evaluating RER, HR, RPE, and Rf, respectively. Significant differences occurred between Rf and all other measures (p < 0.001); no significant differences occurred between RER, HR, RPE. Traditional VO2max criteria may be feasibly obtained and used in CS; HR and RPE are valid alternatives to RER, but Rf is not. The equivalency between RER, RPE, and HR suggests metabolic carts may be unnecessary for CS during maximal testing, increasing accessibility and validity of VO2max values.

Abstract Image

评估癌症幸存者分级运动测试的有效VO2max标准。
心血管健康(VO2max)预测全因死亡率,对于评估癌症幸存者(CS)的个体化运动处方至关重要。代谢车确认VO2max呼吸交换比(RER)≥1.10;其他VO2max标准包括≤10次/分钟的最大预测心率和/或在修正博格量表上的感知运动(RPE)评级为bb80。另一个建议的标准是呼吸频率(Rf)≥40次/分钟。假设这些标准适用于所有人群,但由于癌症相关的毒性,传统VO2max标准在CS中的使用频率和有效性仍未得到证实。目的是评估在CS中使用HR、RPE和Rf实现RER和交替最大标准的VO2max标准的频率。40名CS使用气体分析进行了3次分级运动测试(GXT),共计111 GXT。测定最大RER、HR、RPE和Rf。使用Cochran’s Q检验和带Bonferroni调整的两两比较Dunn检验来评估VO2max标准成功实现频率的差异。在评估RER、HR、RPE和Rf时,分别有84%、79%、92%和43%的试验成功达到最大标准。Rf与所有其他测量值之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001);RER、HR、RPE之间差异无统计学意义。传统的VO2max准则在CS中是可行的;HR和RPE是RER的有效替代品,但Rf不是。RER, RPE和HR之间的等效性表明,在最大测试期间,CS可能不需要代谢车,从而增加了VO2max值的可及性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信