Effectiveness of Exercise-Based Rehabilitation in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2025-05-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.70252/DAYA4589
Antonio De Vera Martín, Alberto Díaz Salazar, Isidro Miguel Martín Pérez, Sebastián Eustaquio Martín Pérez
{"title":"Effectiveness of Exercise-Based Rehabilitation in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Antonio De Vera Martín, Alberto Díaz Salazar, Isidro Miguel Martín Pérez, Sebastián Eustaquio Martín Pérez","doi":"10.70252/DAYA4589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is a complex and debilitating disorder characterized by persistent fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, sleep disturbances, and cognitive impairments. The global prevalence is estimated between 0.2% and 0.4%, affecting over 17 million individuals worldwide, with an estimated burden exceeding 40,000 cases in Spain. Despite the exploration of exercise-based rehabilitation as a therapeutic strategy, its clinical efficacy remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise-based rehabilitation relative to conventional treatments in improving functional capacity and alleviating fatigue among adults with CFS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024573955). Searches were systematically performed across MEDLINE, PEDro, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Scopus, and SportDiscus, covering studies published between January 2010 and January 2024. Methodological quality and risk of bias, assessed using the validated PEDro Scale and Cochrane tool, ranged from moderate to good, with bias levels varying from low to high. Inclusion criteria targeted studies investigating structured therapeutic exercise interventions, including aerobic training, resistance exercises, and mind-body therapies. A total of 11 studies were included in the qualitative review, and with 7 randomized controlled trials (n = 2,276 participants) were finally incorporated in the meta-analysis. Exercise-based interventions, including aerobic training, resistance exercises, graded exercise therapy (GET), mind-body therapies and multimodal programs, showed significantly significant reductions in fatigue in both the short term (n = 720) SMD = -0.50; 95% CI: [-0.75, -0.24]; Z = 3.81; p < 0.001) and medium term (n = 501; SMD = -0.53; 95% CI: [-0.95, -0.12]; Z = 2.52; p = 0.01). Medium-term improvements in functionality were also significant (n = 685; SMD = 0.31; 95% CI: [0.11, 0.52]; Z = 2.96; p = 0.003), whereas short-term functionality outcomes were lesser compared to controls (n = 366; SMD = 0.10; 95% CI: [-0.05, 0.25]; Z = 1.29; p = 0.20). Notably, the meta-analytic findings indicated that medium-term functional outcomes slightly favored control groups over exercise interventions, and no significant long-term benefits were observed in either fatigue reduction or functional capacity enhancement. These findings underscore the selective efficacy of exercise-based rehabilitation for CFS, particularly in mitigating fatigue over the short to medium term. However, the transient nature of functional improvements highlights the need for further research to optimize exercise protocols, determine the most effective modalities, and develop strategies to sustain long-term therapeutic outcomes. While the results support exercise as a potential adjunctive therapy for CFS, they also emphasize the necessity of rigorous, longitudinal investigations to establish its clinical applicability and long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 5","pages":"495-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/DAYA4589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is a complex and debilitating disorder characterized by persistent fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, sleep disturbances, and cognitive impairments. The global prevalence is estimated between 0.2% and 0.4%, affecting over 17 million individuals worldwide, with an estimated burden exceeding 40,000 cases in Spain. Despite the exploration of exercise-based rehabilitation as a therapeutic strategy, its clinical efficacy remains a subject of ongoing debate. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise-based rehabilitation relative to conventional treatments in improving functional capacity and alleviating fatigue among adults with CFS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42024573955). Searches were systematically performed across MEDLINE, PEDro, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Scopus, and SportDiscus, covering studies published between January 2010 and January 2024. Methodological quality and risk of bias, assessed using the validated PEDro Scale and Cochrane tool, ranged from moderate to good, with bias levels varying from low to high. Inclusion criteria targeted studies investigating structured therapeutic exercise interventions, including aerobic training, resistance exercises, and mind-body therapies. A total of 11 studies were included in the qualitative review, and with 7 randomized controlled trials (n = 2,276 participants) were finally incorporated in the meta-analysis. Exercise-based interventions, including aerobic training, resistance exercises, graded exercise therapy (GET), mind-body therapies and multimodal programs, showed significantly significant reductions in fatigue in both the short term (n = 720) SMD = -0.50; 95% CI: [-0.75, -0.24]; Z = 3.81; p < 0.001) and medium term (n = 501; SMD = -0.53; 95% CI: [-0.95, -0.12]; Z = 2.52; p = 0.01). Medium-term improvements in functionality were also significant (n = 685; SMD = 0.31; 95% CI: [0.11, 0.52]; Z = 2.96; p = 0.003), whereas short-term functionality outcomes were lesser compared to controls (n = 366; SMD = 0.10; 95% CI: [-0.05, 0.25]; Z = 1.29; p = 0.20). Notably, the meta-analytic findings indicated that medium-term functional outcomes slightly favored control groups over exercise interventions, and no significant long-term benefits were observed in either fatigue reduction or functional capacity enhancement. These findings underscore the selective efficacy of exercise-based rehabilitation for CFS, particularly in mitigating fatigue over the short to medium term. However, the transient nature of functional improvements highlights the need for further research to optimize exercise protocols, determine the most effective modalities, and develop strategies to sustain long-term therapeutic outcomes. While the results support exercise as a potential adjunctive therapy for CFS, they also emphasize the necessity of rigorous, longitudinal investigations to establish its clinical applicability and long-term efficacy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

以运动为基础的康复治疗慢性疲劳综合征的有效性:一项系统综述和meta分析。
慢性疲劳综合征是一种复杂的衰弱性疾病,以持续疲劳、肌肉骨骼疼痛、睡眠障碍和认知障碍为特征。全球流行率估计在0.2%至0.4%之间,影响全世界1700多万人,西班牙的负担估计超过4万例。尽管以运动为基础的康复作为一种治疗策略的探索,其临床疗效仍然是一个正在进行辩论的主题。本研究旨在评估运动康复相对于传统治疗在改善成人CFS功能能力和缓解疲劳方面的有效性。遵循PRISMA指南并在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42024573955)中进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。系统地在MEDLINE、PEDro、CINAHL、b谷歌Scholar、Scopus和SportDiscus上进行检索,涵盖了2010年1月至2024年1月之间发表的研究。采用经验证的PEDro量表和Cochrane工具评估方法学质量和偏倚风险,偏倚水平从低到高,从中等到良好。纳入标准有针对性的研究调查了结构化的治疗性运动干预,包括有氧训练、阻力训练和身心疗法。定性评价共纳入11项研究,最终纳入7项随机对照试验(n = 2276名受试者)进行meta分析。以运动为基础的干预措施,包括有氧训练、阻力训练、分级运动疗法(GET)、身心疗法和多模式方案,在短期内(n = 720)均显示出显著的疲劳减轻(SMD = -0.50;95% ci: [-0.75, -0.24];Z = 3.81;P < 0.001)和中期(n = 501;SMD = -0.53;95% ci: [-0.95, -0.12];Z = 2.52;P = 0.01)。中期功能改善也很显著(n = 685;SMD = 0.31;95% ci: [0.11, 0.52];Z = 2.96;P = 0.003),而与对照组相比,短期功能预后较差(n = 366;SMD = 0.10;95% ci: [-0.05, 0.25];Z = 1.29;P = 0.20)。值得注意的是,荟萃分析结果表明,与运动干预相比,对照组的中期功能结果略微有利,并且在疲劳减少或功能能力增强方面没有观察到显著的长期益处。这些发现强调了以运动为基础的康复治疗慢性疲劳综合症的选择性疗效,特别是在短期到中期缓解疲劳方面。然而,功能改善的短暂性突出了进一步研究的必要性,以优化运动方案,确定最有效的方式,并制定维持长期治疗结果的策略。虽然结果支持运动作为CFS的潜在辅助疗法,但他们也强调了严格的纵向研究以确定其临床适用性和长期疗效的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信