Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy with Stylet and Suction Versus No Stylet No Suction for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S516107
Marwa A Ahmed, Mohamed Yousri Ahmed, Hossam Eldin Shaaban, Sameh E A Abou Elenin, Ahmed Ali El-Habashi, Fatima Belabbes, Mohammed Tag-Adeen, Abeer Abdellatef, Hussein Hassan Okasha
{"title":"Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy with Stylet and Suction Versus No Stylet No Suction for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.","authors":"Marwa A Ahmed, Mohamed Yousri Ahmed, Hossam Eldin Shaaban, Sameh E A Abou Elenin, Ahmed Ali El-Habashi, Fatima Belabbes, Mohammed Tag-Adeen, Abeer Abdellatef, Hussein Hassan Okasha","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S516107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is the procedure of choice to obtain samples to diagnose pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Previous randomized trials demonstrated that using stylets during the EUS-fine needle biopsy (FNB) technique does not improve the diagnostic yield. However, little data exists regarding the role of stylet and suction in the core biopsy needle during EUS-guided tissue acquisition.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy and diagnostic yield of samples collected by EUS-FNB with stylet and suction versus no stylet, no suction techniques.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective study included 167 patients referred to the Gastroenterology Division, Internal Medicine Department, Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals for EUS-guided biopsy from pancreatic or non-pancreatic lesions from May 2021 to January 2024. Each lesion was sampled twice using an EUS-FNB 22-gauge Franseen-tip needle (Acquire; Boston Scientific, USA); one sample was collected with stylet and suction, while the other with no stylet no suction technique. Subsequently, slides were evaluated for cellularity, tissue integrity, degree of blood contamination, and diagnostic ability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 167 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 78 females and 89 males, with a mean age of 61 years. Most lesions were pancreatic (83.2%, n = 139), while the remaining (16.8%, n = 28) were non-pancreatic. No significant differences were observed between stylet and suction versus no stylet, no suction techniques. The diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy, was identical (100%) for both methods when evaluating alcohol-fixed smears in conjunction with formalin-preserved tissues collected through FNB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EUS-FNB tissue acquisition with and without stylet and suction provides comparable diagnostic yield and tissue quality for pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. The decision to use a stylet and suction should be individualized based on the clinical context and operator experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"2851-2860"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S516107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is the procedure of choice to obtain samples to diagnose pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Previous randomized trials demonstrated that using stylets during the EUS-fine needle biopsy (FNB) technique does not improve the diagnostic yield. However, little data exists regarding the role of stylet and suction in the core biopsy needle during EUS-guided tissue acquisition.

Aim of the study: This study aims to assess the efficacy and diagnostic yield of samples collected by EUS-FNB with stylet and suction versus no stylet, no suction techniques.

Patients and methods: This prospective study included 167 patients referred to the Gastroenterology Division, Internal Medicine Department, Kasr Al-Aini Hospitals for EUS-guided biopsy from pancreatic or non-pancreatic lesions from May 2021 to January 2024. Each lesion was sampled twice using an EUS-FNB 22-gauge Franseen-tip needle (Acquire; Boston Scientific, USA); one sample was collected with stylet and suction, while the other with no stylet no suction technique. Subsequently, slides were evaluated for cellularity, tissue integrity, degree of blood contamination, and diagnostic ability.

Results: A total of 167 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 78 females and 89 males, with a mean age of 61 years. Most lesions were pancreatic (83.2%, n = 139), while the remaining (16.8%, n = 28) were non-pancreatic. No significant differences were observed between stylet and suction versus no stylet, no suction techniques. The diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy, was identical (100%) for both methods when evaluating alcohol-fixed smears in conjunction with formalin-preserved tissues collected through FNB.

Conclusion: EUS-FNB tissue acquisition with and without stylet and suction provides comparable diagnostic yield and tissue quality for pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. The decision to use a stylet and suction should be individualized based on the clinical context and operator experience.

超声内镜引导下细针活检有针柱和抽吸与无针柱和抽吸诊断胰腺和非胰腺病变的比较。
背景:超声内镜(EUS)引导下的组织采集是获得胰腺和非胰腺病变样本的首选方法。先前的随机试验表明,在eus细针活检(FNB)技术中使用针柱并不能提高诊断率。然而,在eus引导下组织采集过程中,很少有关于穿刺针和抽吸在核心活检针中的作用的数据。研究目的:本研究的目的是评估EUS-FNB收集的样本有柱头和吸痰与无柱头、无吸痰技术的疗效和诊断率。患者和方法:这项前瞻性研究包括167名患者,于2021年5月至2024年1月在Kasr Al-Aini医院内科消化内科进行eus引导的胰腺或非胰腺病变活检。每个病灶使用EUS-FNB 22号法兰森针尖取样两次(Acquire;波士顿科学公司,美国);一组标本采用吸柱法采集,另一组标本不采用吸柱法采集。随后,对切片进行细胞度、组织完整性、血液污染程度和诊断能力的评估。结果:167例患者符合纳入标准,其中女性78例,男性89例,平均年龄61岁。大多数病变为胰腺(83.2%,n = 139),其余(16.8%,n = 28)为非胰腺。在有柱头和吸力与没有柱头和吸力技术之间没有显著差异。当评估酒精固定涂片与FNB收集的福尔马林保存组织时,两种方法的诊断性能,包括敏感性、特异性和总体准确性,都是相同的(100%)。结论:EUS-FNB组织采集对胰腺和非胰腺病变的诊断率和组织质量具有可比性。决定使用一个风格和吸引应个性化的基础上的临床情况和操作人员的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信