Dual energy CT-based Radiomics for identification of myocardial focal scar and artificial beam-hardening

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Linqi Zeng , Feng Hu , Peixin Qin , Taoyu Jia , Ling Lu , Zhengying Yang , Xiaobing Zhou , Yuqing Qiu , Liyun Luo , Bairong Chen , Lizi Jin , Wenyi Tang , Yanlin Wang , Fang Zhou , Tianmin Liu , Ani Wang , Zhijuan Zhou , Xiaosheng Guo , Zhiwei Zheng , Xiuwu Fan , Cunxue Pan
{"title":"Dual energy CT-based Radiomics for identification of myocardial focal scar and artificial beam-hardening","authors":"Linqi Zeng ,&nbsp;Feng Hu ,&nbsp;Peixin Qin ,&nbsp;Taoyu Jia ,&nbsp;Ling Lu ,&nbsp;Zhengying Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaobing Zhou ,&nbsp;Yuqing Qiu ,&nbsp;Liyun Luo ,&nbsp;Bairong Chen ,&nbsp;Lizi Jin ,&nbsp;Wenyi Tang ,&nbsp;Yanlin Wang ,&nbsp;Fang Zhou ,&nbsp;Tianmin Liu ,&nbsp;Ani Wang ,&nbsp;Zhijuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaosheng Guo ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiuwu Fan ,&nbsp;Cunxue Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Computed tomography is an inadequate method for detecting myocardial focal scar (MFS) due to its moderate density resolution, which is insufficient for distinguishing MFS from artificial beam-hardening (BH). Virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) of dual-energy coronary computed tomography angiography (DECCTA) provide a variety of diagnostic information with significant potential for detecting myocardial lesions. The aim of this study was to assess whether radiomics analysis in VMIs of DECCTA can help distinguish MFS from BH.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective cohort of patients who were suspected with an old myocardial infarction was assembled at two different centers between Janurary 2021 and June 2024. MFS and BH segmentation and radiomics feature extraction and selection were performed on VMIs images, and four machine learning classifiers were constructed using selected strongest features. Subsequently, an independent validation was conducted, and a subjective diagnosis of the validation set was provided by an radiologist. The AUC was used to assess the performance of the radiomics models.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>The training set included 57 patients from center 1 (mean age, 54 years +/− 9, 55 men), and the external validation set included 10 patients from center 2 (mean age, 59 years +/− 10, 9 men). The radiomics models exhibited the highest AUC value of 0.937 (expressed at 130 keV VMIs), while the radiologist demonstrated the highest AUC value of 0.734 (expressed at 40 keV VMIs).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The integration of radiomic features derived from VMIs of DECCTA with machine learning algorithms has the potential to improve the efficiency of distinguishing MFS from BH.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"437 ","pages":"Article 133482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016752732500525X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Computed tomography is an inadequate method for detecting myocardial focal scar (MFS) due to its moderate density resolution, which is insufficient for distinguishing MFS from artificial beam-hardening (BH). Virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) of dual-energy coronary computed tomography angiography (DECCTA) provide a variety of diagnostic information with significant potential for detecting myocardial lesions. The aim of this study was to assess whether radiomics analysis in VMIs of DECCTA can help distinguish MFS from BH.

Methods

A prospective cohort of patients who were suspected with an old myocardial infarction was assembled at two different centers between Janurary 2021 and June 2024. MFS and BH segmentation and radiomics feature extraction and selection were performed on VMIs images, and four machine learning classifiers were constructed using selected strongest features. Subsequently, an independent validation was conducted, and a subjective diagnosis of the validation set was provided by an radiologist. The AUC was used to assess the performance of the radiomics models.

Result

The training set included 57 patients from center 1 (mean age, 54 years +/− 9, 55 men), and the external validation set included 10 patients from center 2 (mean age, 59 years +/− 10, 9 men). The radiomics models exhibited the highest AUC value of 0.937 (expressed at 130 keV VMIs), while the radiologist demonstrated the highest AUC value of 0.734 (expressed at 40 keV VMIs).

Conclusion

The integration of radiomic features derived from VMIs of DECCTA with machine learning algorithms has the potential to improve the efficiency of distinguishing MFS from BH.
基于双能ct放射组学的心肌局灶性瘢痕和人工束硬化鉴别。
背景:计算机断层扫描是一种检测心肌局灶性瘢痕(MFS)的不充分的方法,因为它的密度分辨率适中,不足以区分MFS和人工波束硬化(BH)。双能冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(DECCTA)的虚拟单色图像(VMIs)提供了多种诊断信息,对检测心肌病变具有重要的潜力。本研究的目的是评估DECCTA VMIs的放射组学分析是否有助于区分MFS和BH。方法:在2021年1月至2024年6月期间,在两个不同的中心收集了怀疑患有老年性心肌梗死的患者的前瞻性队列。对VMIs图像进行MFS和BH分割和放射组学特征提取和选择,并根据选择的最强特征构建4个机器学习分类器。随后,进行独立验证,并由放射科医生提供验证集的主观诊断。AUC用于评估放射组学模型的性能。结果:训练集包括来自中心1的57例患者(平均年龄54 岁+/- 9,男性55例),外部验证集包括来自中心2的10例患者(平均年龄59 岁+/- 10,男性9例)。放射组学模型的AUC值最高,为0.937(以130 keV VMIs表示),而放射科医生的AUC值最高,为0.734(以40 keV VMIs表示)。结论:将DECCTA的VMIs放射学特征与机器学习算法相结合,可以提高MFS与BH的鉴别效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信