Clinical Outcomes of Eravacycline in Patients Treated for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Mohammed Al Musawa, Ashlan J Kunz Coyne, Sara Alosaimy, Kristen Lucas, Melanie Rae Schrack, Justin Andrade, Shelbye R Herbin, Mark Biagi, Michael Pierce, Kyle C Molina, Nicholson B Perkins, Reese Cosimi, Lena Kang-Birken, Madeline A King, Benjamin M Pullinger, Leonor M Rojas, Jeannette Bouchard, Athena L V Hobbs, Jazmin Agee, Kaylee E Caniff, Sean R Van Helden, Michael P Veve, Michael J Rybak
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Eravacycline in Patients Treated for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections.","authors":"Mohammed Al Musawa, Ashlan J Kunz Coyne, Sara Alosaimy, Kristen Lucas, Melanie Rae Schrack, Justin Andrade, Shelbye R Herbin, Mark Biagi, Michael Pierce, Kyle C Molina, Nicholson B Perkins, Reese Cosimi, Lena Kang-Birken, Madeline A King, Benjamin M Pullinger, Leonor M Rojas, Jeannette Bouchard, Athena L V Hobbs, Jazmin Agee, Kaylee E Caniff, Sean R Van Helden, Michael P Veve, Michael J Rybak","doi":"10.1007/s40121-025-01170-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is notable for its rising incidence and multidrug resistance, which complicates treatment. As a result of insufficient clinical studies, the 2024 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidance on Treating Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-negative Infection advises against using eravacycline (ERV) for S. maltophilia infections. We present real-world data on patients treated with ERV for these infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included adult patients who received ERV for treating S. maltophilia infections for ≥ 72 h between October 2018 and August 2022. The primary outcome was the clinical cure evaluated at the end of ERV therapy. Key secondary outcomes included a 30-day survival rate, absence of infection recurrence counting from the end of ERV therapy, and occurrence of possible ERV-related adverse effects (AE) noted in the patient's records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 41 patients were included with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 63 years (46.0-74.5). Most patients were male (63.4%) and white (51.2%). The primary source of infection was pulmonary (56.1%), and most patients received ERV for regimen consolidation (65.9%). Combination therapy was used in about 10% of the cases for S. maltophilia treatment. The median (IQR) duration of ERV treatment was 7 days (4.0-11.5). The clinical cure rate was 73.2%, and the 30-day survival rate was 68.3%. Four patients (9.8%) experienced possible AE from ERV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>S. maltophilia infections are challenging to treat because of limited options. An analysis of 41 patients indicates ERV may be an acceptable treatment option, but more clinical studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01170-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is notable for its rising incidence and multidrug resistance, which complicates treatment. As a result of insufficient clinical studies, the 2024 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidance on Treating Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-negative Infection advises against using eravacycline (ERV) for S. maltophilia infections. We present real-world data on patients treated with ERV for these infections.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included adult patients who received ERV for treating S. maltophilia infections for ≥ 72 h between October 2018 and August 2022. The primary outcome was the clinical cure evaluated at the end of ERV therapy. Key secondary outcomes included a 30-day survival rate, absence of infection recurrence counting from the end of ERV therapy, and occurrence of possible ERV-related adverse effects (AE) noted in the patient's records.

Results: Overall, 41 patients were included with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 63 years (46.0-74.5). Most patients were male (63.4%) and white (51.2%). The primary source of infection was pulmonary (56.1%), and most patients received ERV for regimen consolidation (65.9%). Combination therapy was used in about 10% of the cases for S. maltophilia treatment. The median (IQR) duration of ERV treatment was 7 days (4.0-11.5). The clinical cure rate was 73.2%, and the 30-day survival rate was 68.3%. Four patients (9.8%) experienced possible AE from ERV.

Conclusion: S. maltophilia infections are challenging to treat because of limited options. An analysis of 41 patients indicates ERV may be an acceptable treatment option, but more clinical studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

依拉瓦环素治疗嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌感染的临床疗效。
嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌发病率上升,耐多药,使治疗复杂化。由于临床研究不足,2024年美国传染病学会(IDSA)关于治疗耐药革兰氏阴性感染的指南建议不要使用依拉瓦环素(ERV)治疗嗜麦葡萄球菌感染。我们提供了用ERV治疗这些感染的患者的真实数据。方法:这项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究纳入了2018年10月至2022年8月期间接受ERV治疗嗜麦芽链球菌感染≥72小时的成年患者。主要结果是在ERV治疗结束时评估的临床治愈情况。关键的次要结局包括30天生存率、ERV治疗结束后感染复发计数、患者记录中可能发生的ERV相关不良反应(AE)。结果:共纳入41例患者,中位年龄(四分位数间距[IQR])为63岁(46.0-74.5岁)。以男性(63.4%)和白人(51.2%)居多。主要感染源为肺部(56.1%),大多数患者接受ERV治疗以巩固治疗方案(65.9%)。约10%的嗜麦芽链球菌采用联合治疗。ERV治疗的中位(IQR)持续时间为7天(4.0-11.5天)。临床治愈率为73.2%,30天生存率为68.3%。4例患者(9.8%)可能出现ERV所致AE。结论:嗜麦芽葡萄球菌感染是具有挑战性的治疗,因为有限的选择。对41例患者的分析表明,ERV可能是一种可接受的治疗选择,但需要更多的临床研究来评估其有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信