Comparative Analysis of In vitro Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Indian Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.4103/ijd.ijd_647_23
Sudeshna Das, Deepti Rawat, Ravinder Kaur, Vibhu Mendiratta, Pradeep K Singh
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of <i>In vitro</i> Susceptibility Profile of Dermatophytes Against 8 Antifungal Agents: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Sudeshna Das, Deepti Rawat, Ravinder Kaur, Vibhu Mendiratta, Pradeep K Singh","doi":"10.4103/ijd.ijd_647_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The currently reported prevalence of dermatophytosis (superficial mycoses) in India ranges from 6.09%-61.5%. Due to the rising cases of treatment failure, chronic recalcitrant disease, and frequent relapses, standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes has become important.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To determine the <i>in vitro</i> susceptibility profile of different isolates of dermatophytes to eight antifungal drugs by broth microdilution method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In total, 236 consecutive patients who were clinically suspected of suffering from dermatophytosis were included in this cross-sectional descriptive study. Nails, hair clippings, and skin scrapings were tested by the KOH mount and cultured on Sabouraud's agar medium (incubated at 25°C and 37°C) and dermatophyte test media. The dermatophytes isolated were identified based on the morphology of the colony growth as observed in the lacto phenol cotton blue (LPCB) mount, temperature tolerance, urease production, and <i>in vitro</i> hair perforation test. Antifungal susceptibility test was performed for dermatophytes against eight antifungal agents (terbinafine, griseofulvin, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, luliconazole, and posaconazole) using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method (M38-3<sup>rd</sup> edition).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Trichophyton rubrum</i> was the most common dermatophyte species isolated in the study. Triazoles were found to have low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), except fluconazole, which showed very high MIC values with 55.2% isolates showing resistance (MIC ≥ 32 μg/mL). Luliconazole had the lowest MIC90 (0.003 μg/mL). There was a wide variation in the MIC values for terbinafine (0.06-16 μg/mL) and griseofulvin (0.125-8 μg/mL) with 13.1% and 52.6% of isolates showing resistance (MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL) to terbinafine and griseofulvin respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study showcases the MIC values of eight anti-fungal drugs used for the treatment of different species of dermatophytes. It was observed that the commonly used antifungals such as fluconazole, griseofulvin, and terbinafine showed high MIC values compared to newer drugs such as luliconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole. More studies based on species distribution and antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) should be performed to understand the changing epidemiology of dermatophytosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13401,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatology","volume":"70 3","pages":"117-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_647_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The currently reported prevalence of dermatophytosis (superficial mycoses) in India ranges from 6.09%-61.5%. Due to the rising cases of treatment failure, chronic recalcitrant disease, and frequent relapses, standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes has become important.

Aims and objectives: To determine the in vitro susceptibility profile of different isolates of dermatophytes to eight antifungal drugs by broth microdilution method.

Materials and methods: In total, 236 consecutive patients who were clinically suspected of suffering from dermatophytosis were included in this cross-sectional descriptive study. Nails, hair clippings, and skin scrapings were tested by the KOH mount and cultured on Sabouraud's agar medium (incubated at 25°C and 37°C) and dermatophyte test media. The dermatophytes isolated were identified based on the morphology of the colony growth as observed in the lacto phenol cotton blue (LPCB) mount, temperature tolerance, urease production, and in vitro hair perforation test. Antifungal susceptibility test was performed for dermatophytes against eight antifungal agents (terbinafine, griseofulvin, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, luliconazole, and posaconazole) using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method (M38-3rd edition).

Results: Trichophyton rubrum was the most common dermatophyte species isolated in the study. Triazoles were found to have low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), except fluconazole, which showed very high MIC values with 55.2% isolates showing resistance (MIC ≥ 32 μg/mL). Luliconazole had the lowest MIC90 (0.003 μg/mL). There was a wide variation in the MIC values for terbinafine (0.06-16 μg/mL) and griseofulvin (0.125-8 μg/mL) with 13.1% and 52.6% of isolates showing resistance (MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL) to terbinafine and griseofulvin respectively.

Conclusion: The present study showcases the MIC values of eight anti-fungal drugs used for the treatment of different species of dermatophytes. It was observed that the commonly used antifungals such as fluconazole, griseofulvin, and terbinafine showed high MIC values compared to newer drugs such as luliconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole. More studies based on species distribution and antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) should be performed to understand the changing epidemiology of dermatophytosis.

皮肤真菌对8种抗真菌药物的体外敏感性对比分析:横断面研究。
背景:目前报道的皮肤真菌病(浅表真菌病)在印度的患病率为6.09%-61.5%。由于治疗失败、慢性顽固性疾病和频繁复发的病例不断增加,皮肤癣菌抗真菌药敏试验的标准化变得非常重要。目的:采用微量肉汤稀释法测定不同分离株皮肤真菌对8种抗真菌药物的体外药敏谱。材料和方法:本横断面描述性研究共纳入236例临床怀疑患有皮肤癣的连续患者。指甲、剪发和皮肤屑通过KOH mount进行测试,并在Sabouraud琼脂培养基(在25°C和37°C孵育)和皮肤真菌试验培养基上培养。通过乳酚棉蓝(LPCB)挂载、耐温性、脲酶产量和体外毛发穿孔试验观察到的菌落生长形态来鉴定分离的皮癣菌。采用美国临床与实验室标准协会肉汤微量稀释法(m38 -3版)对8种抗真菌药物(特比萘芬、灰黄霉素、伊曲康唑、氟康唑、伏立康唑、酮康唑、露立康唑、泊沙康唑)进行皮肤真菌药敏试验。结果:红毛癣菌是本研究分离到的最常见的皮菌种。除氟康唑的最低抑制浓度(MIC)非常高外,其余三唑类药物的最低抑制浓度(MIC)均较低,55.2%的菌株表现出耐药性(MIC≥32 μg/mL)。Luliconazole的MIC90最低(0.003 μg/mL)。特比萘芬(0.06 ~ 16 μg/mL)和灰黄霉素(0.125 ~ 8 μg/mL)的MIC值差异较大,分别有13.1%和52.6%的菌株对特比萘芬和灰黄霉素表现耐药(MIC≥4 μg/mL)。结论:本研究显示了8种抗真菌药物治疗不同种类皮肤真菌的MIC值。氟康唑、灰黄霉素、特比萘芬等常用抗真菌药物的MIC值高于卢立康唑、泊沙康唑、伏立康唑等较新的抗真菌药物。进一步开展基于物种分布和抗真菌药敏试验(AFST)的研究,以了解皮肤真菌病的流行病学变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Indian Journal of Dermatology Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes information related to skin-pathology and different modes of therapeutics, including dermatosurgery and cosmetic dermatology. Likewise, it carries articles on leprosy, STI and HIV/AIDS. The editorial board encourages the authors to publish articles addressing emerging techniques and developments in the subject specialty, in the form of Original investigations, Narrative and Systematic Reviews as well as Case Reports. The journal aims at publishing Editorials and Commentaries from eminent personalities on a regular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信