80% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Indian Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-08 DOI:10.4103/ijd.ijd_969_23
Priya P Kadu, Rachana A Laul
{"title":"80% Lactic Acid Peel Versus 50% Glycolic Acid Peel for Melasma: A Randomised Clinical Trial.","authors":"Priya P Kadu, Rachana A Laul","doi":"10.4103/ijd.ijd_969_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peels are simple, inexpensive office procedures with acceptable side effect profiles and make a good treatment modality for patients with melasma. Glycolic acid peels have been used widely for the treatment of melasma. Due to their tendency to cause undesirable side effects such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, other modalities need to be studied. To compare the efficacy of 80% lactic acid and 50% glycolic acid peel for the treatment of melasma. This was a prospective, single-blinded (study subjects), randomised study. Forty patients with melasma between the ages of 18-50 years from the dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in Central India were included in the study and randomised to receive either 80% lactic acid peel or 50% glycolic acid peel (20 in the lactic acid group and 20 in the glycolic acid group) for four sessions at 2-week intervals. The efficacy was assessed using Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores calculated at the baseline and at the end of the treatment (10 weeks). The pre- and post-treatment MASI scores were calculated for each treatment, and their difference was compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Thirty-four patients completed the study over 6 months and were included in the final analysis. Six patients were lost to follow-up. The median (25<sup>th</sup>-75<sup>th</sup> percentile) decrease in MASI with glycolic acid 50% peel was 2.85 (1.875-3), which was significantly higher as compared to lactic acid 80% peel, which was 1.8 (1.125-2.4) (<i>P</i> value = 0.009). No significant difference was seen in the side effect profile (<i>P</i> value = 0.105). 50% glycolic acid peel is more efficacious than 80% lactic acid peel for the treatment of melasma.</p>","PeriodicalId":13401,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatology","volume":"70 3","pages":"152-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_969_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peels are simple, inexpensive office procedures with acceptable side effect profiles and make a good treatment modality for patients with melasma. Glycolic acid peels have been used widely for the treatment of melasma. Due to their tendency to cause undesirable side effects such as post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, other modalities need to be studied. To compare the efficacy of 80% lactic acid and 50% glycolic acid peel for the treatment of melasma. This was a prospective, single-blinded (study subjects), randomised study. Forty patients with melasma between the ages of 18-50 years from the dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in Central India were included in the study and randomised to receive either 80% lactic acid peel or 50% glycolic acid peel (20 in the lactic acid group and 20 in the glycolic acid group) for four sessions at 2-week intervals. The efficacy was assessed using Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores calculated at the baseline and at the end of the treatment (10 weeks). The pre- and post-treatment MASI scores were calculated for each treatment, and their difference was compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Thirty-four patients completed the study over 6 months and were included in the final analysis. Six patients were lost to follow-up. The median (25th-75th percentile) decrease in MASI with glycolic acid 50% peel was 2.85 (1.875-3), which was significantly higher as compared to lactic acid 80% peel, which was 1.8 (1.125-2.4) (P value = 0.009). No significant difference was seen in the side effect profile (P value = 0.105). 50% glycolic acid peel is more efficacious than 80% lactic acid peel for the treatment of melasma.

80%乳酸脱皮与50%乙醇酸脱皮治疗黄褐斑:一项随机临床试验。
换肤术是一种简单、廉价的手术,副作用可接受,对黄褐斑患者来说是一种很好的治疗方式。乙醇酸换肤已被广泛用于治疗黄褐斑。由于其倾向于引起不良的副作用,如炎症后色素沉着,其他方式需要研究。比较80%乳酸脱皮和50%乙醇酸脱皮治疗黄褐斑的疗效。这是一项前瞻性、单盲(研究对象)、随机研究。来自印度中部一家三级医院皮肤科门诊部的40名年龄在18-50岁之间的黄褐斑患者被纳入研究,并随机分配接受80%乳酸脱皮或50%乙醇酸脱皮治疗(乳酸组20名,乙醇酸组20名),每隔2周进行4次治疗。使用基线和治疗结束(10周)时计算的黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(MASI)评分来评估疗效。计算每次治疗前和治疗后的MASI评分,并使用Mann-Whitney检验比较其差异。34例患者在6个月内完成研究,并纳入最终分析。6例患者未随访。乙醇酸50%去皮的MASI中位数(25 -75百分位数)下降为2.85(1.875-3),显著高于乳酸80%去皮的1.8 (1.125-2.4)(P值= 0.009)。两组毒副反应差异无统计学意义(P值= 0.105)。50%乙醇酸去皮治疗黄褐斑比80%乳酸去皮更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Indian Journal of Dermatology Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes information related to skin-pathology and different modes of therapeutics, including dermatosurgery and cosmetic dermatology. Likewise, it carries articles on leprosy, STI and HIV/AIDS. The editorial board encourages the authors to publish articles addressing emerging techniques and developments in the subject specialty, in the form of Original investigations, Narrative and Systematic Reviews as well as Case Reports. The journal aims at publishing Editorials and Commentaries from eminent personalities on a regular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信