Doris Klingelhöfer, Markus Braun, Janis Dröge, David A Groneberg, Dörthe Brüggmann
{"title":"Research on artificial intelligence, machine and deep learning in medicine: global characteristics, readiness, and equity.","authors":"Doris Klingelhöfer, Markus Braun, Janis Dröge, David A Groneberg, Dörthe Brüggmann","doi":"10.1186/s12992-025-01128-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) will have a lasting and drastic impact on medical research and healthcare. In addition to the benefits, the associated risks are also the subject of controversial debate and there are fears of serious consequences. There is an urgent need for action, which must be underpinned by scientific information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By analyzing temporal and geographic patterns, including national readiness for access to AI, we therefore identified incentives and barriers to global research under socioeconomic conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The explosive increase in annual publications started in 2017. The main players in AI<sub>med</sub> research were the USA, China, the UK, Germany, and South Korea. There was a significant correlation between the publication output on AI in medicine (AI<sub>med</sub>) and the metrics for economy and innovation. Additionally, citation patterns show the disadvantage of the Global South compared to the North American and European countries. In several weaker economies: Jordan, Pakistan, Egypt, Bangladesh, and Ethiopia, a more positive position was found in relation to the number of articles suggesting a better ranking in AI<sub>med</sub> research in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results show the need for advanced global networking to ensure all relevant aspects for equitable development and the beneficial use of AI<sub>med</sub> without promoting racial or regional inequities and to enforce this not only in the AI systems of economically strong countries but also for the participation of economically weaker countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12147299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01128-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) will have a lasting and drastic impact on medical research and healthcare. In addition to the benefits, the associated risks are also the subject of controversial debate and there are fears of serious consequences. There is an urgent need for action, which must be underpinned by scientific information.
Methods: By analyzing temporal and geographic patterns, including national readiness for access to AI, we therefore identified incentives and barriers to global research under socioeconomic conditions.
Results: The explosive increase in annual publications started in 2017. The main players in AImed research were the USA, China, the UK, Germany, and South Korea. There was a significant correlation between the publication output on AI in medicine (AImed) and the metrics for economy and innovation. Additionally, citation patterns show the disadvantage of the Global South compared to the North American and European countries. In several weaker economies: Jordan, Pakistan, Egypt, Bangladesh, and Ethiopia, a more positive position was found in relation to the number of articles suggesting a better ranking in AImed research in the future.
Conclusion: The results show the need for advanced global networking to ensure all relevant aspects for equitable development and the beneficial use of AImed without promoting racial or regional inequities and to enforce this not only in the AI systems of economically strong countries but also for the participation of economically weaker countries.
背景:人工智能(AI)将对医学研究和医疗保健产生持久而剧烈的影响。除了好处之外,相关的风险也是争议性辩论的主题,人们担心会产生严重后果。迫切需要采取行动,而行动必须以科学信息为基础。方法:通过分析时间和地理模式,包括国家对获取人工智能的准备程度,我们因此确定了社会经济条件下全球研究的激励因素和障碍。结果:2017年开始出现年度出版物爆发式增长。aims研究的主要参与者是美国、中国、英国、德国和韩国。医学领域人工智能(AI in medicine, aims)的发表量与经济和创新指标之间存在显著相关性。此外,与北美和欧洲国家相比,引用模式显示了全球南方的劣势。在几个较弱的经济体中:约旦、巴基斯坦、埃及、孟加拉国和埃塞俄比亚,在表明未来在aims研究中排名更高的文章数量方面,排名更为积极。结论:结果表明,需要建立先进的全球网络,以确保公平发展的所有相关方面,并在不促进种族或地区不平等的情况下有益地使用aims,并不仅在经济强国的人工智能系统中执行这一点,而且在经济较弱国家的参与中也要执行这一点。
期刊介绍:
"Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health.
The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.