The impact of pooling on the observed microbiome profile of preweaned piglet feces.

IF 3.5 3区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Tara N Gaire, Jared Young, Thomas Wehri, Mark Schwartz, Randall Singer, Maria Pieters, Noelle R Noyes
{"title":"The impact of pooling on the observed microbiome profile of preweaned piglet feces.","authors":"Tara N Gaire, Jared Young, Thomas Wehri, Mark Schwartz, Randall Singer, Maria Pieters, Noelle R Noyes","doi":"10.1093/femsec/fiaf058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pooling individual samples could be an efficient approach for large-scale population-based microbiome studies. However, it is unknown whether pooled samples accurately reflect the microbiome composition and diversity obtained from individual samples. This study investigated the impact of various pooling methods on the observed fecal microbiome of preweaned piglets. Individual fecal samples were collected from 10 litters of day-old piglets (N = 137) and 10 litters of 20-day-old piglets (N = 121), as well as pen-floor samples from the same litters. The individually collected samples were processed individually and also used to create pools of both raw feces and extracted DNA. Individual samples, raw feces pools, DNA pools, and pen-floor samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The microbial profile in pen-floor samples from litters of preweaned piglets was very different from individual piglet samples within the pen; thus, they may not be suitable for litter-level piglet microbiome studies. However, overall microbial diversity and composition from DNA and feces pools were comparable to individual samples, despite potentially underestimating some low-abundance or low-prevalence taxa. These results suggest that pooling can be used as an efficient and cost-effective approach to characterize litter-level microbial profiles for current and future population-level microbiome research in preweaned piglet populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12312,"journal":{"name":"FEMS microbiology ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12166543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEMS microbiology ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaf058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pooling individual samples could be an efficient approach for large-scale population-based microbiome studies. However, it is unknown whether pooled samples accurately reflect the microbiome composition and diversity obtained from individual samples. This study investigated the impact of various pooling methods on the observed fecal microbiome of preweaned piglets. Individual fecal samples were collected from 10 litters of day-old piglets (N = 137) and 10 litters of 20-day-old piglets (N = 121), as well as pen-floor samples from the same litters. The individually collected samples were processed individually and also used to create pools of both raw feces and extracted DNA. Individual samples, raw feces pools, DNA pools, and pen-floor samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The microbial profile in pen-floor samples from litters of preweaned piglets was very different from individual piglet samples within the pen; thus, they may not be suitable for litter-level piglet microbiome studies. However, overall microbial diversity and composition from DNA and feces pools were comparable to individual samples, despite potentially underestimating some low-abundance or low-prevalence taxa. These results suggest that pooling can be used as an efficient and cost-effective approach to characterize litter-level microbial profiles for current and future population-level microbiome research in preweaned piglet populations.

池化对断奶仔猪粪便微生物群分布的影响。
汇集个体样本可能是大规模基于群体的微生物组研究的有效方法。然而,尚不清楚汇总的样品是否准确反映了从单个样品中获得的微生物组组成和多样性。本研究探讨了不同池化方式对断奶仔猪粪便微生物群的影响。收集10窝日龄仔猪(N=137)和10窝20日龄仔猪(N=121)的粪便样本,以及同一窝的猪栏地板样本。单独收集的样本被单独处理,也被用来建立原始粪便和提取的DNA池。对个体样本、原粪便池、DNA池和围栏地板样本进行16S rRNA基因测序。断奶仔猪窝底样品的微生物分布与窝内仔猪个体样品有很大差异;因此,它们可能不适合窝级仔猪微生物组研究。然而,来自DNA和粪便池的总体微生物多样性和组成与单个样本相当,尽管可能低估了一些低丰度或低流行的分类群。这些结果表明,在当前和未来的断奶仔猪群体微生物组研究中,池化可以作为一种高效和经济的方法来表征窝级微生物谱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FEMS microbiology ecology
FEMS microbiology ecology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
132
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: FEMS Microbiology Ecology aims to ensure efficient publication of high-quality papers that are original and provide a significant contribution to the understanding of microbial ecology. The journal contains Research Articles and MiniReviews on fundamental aspects of the ecology of microorganisms in natural soil, aquatic and atmospheric habitats, including extreme environments, and in artificial or managed environments. Research papers on pure cultures and in the areas of plant pathology and medical, food or veterinary microbiology will be published where they provide valuable generic information on microbial ecology. Papers can deal with culturable and non-culturable forms of any type of microorganism: bacteria, archaea, filamentous fungi, yeasts, protozoa, cyanobacteria, algae or viruses. In addition, the journal will publish Perspectives, Current Opinion and Controversy Articles, Commentaries and Letters to the Editor on topical issues in microbial ecology. - Application of ecological theory to microbial ecology - Interactions and signalling between microorganisms and with plants and animals - Interactions between microorganisms and their physicochemical enviornment - Microbial aspects of biogeochemical cycles and processes - Microbial community ecology - Phylogenetic and functional diversity of microbial communities - Evolutionary biology of microorganisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信