{"title":"Epidemiologic and survival analysis for patients with secondary esophageal Cancer: a population-based study and external validation.","authors":"Jie Wang, Jingyun Zha, Xiaoliang Dong, Ping Liu","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2517883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of dedicated studies addressing the epidemiology, prognostic factors, and optimal management strategies for secondary esophageal cancer (SEC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study sourced data from the SEER database and an independent external cohort. Annual percentage change (APC) was calculated to qualify the incidence trend. Cox regression was employed for survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13,792 sec cases from the SEER database and 63 cases from the validation cohort were included in this study. The incidence of SEC increased from 0.95 per 100,000 persons in 2000 to 1.2 per 100,000 in 2008, stabilizing thereafter. Survival analysis identified disease stage, age, and tumor location as significant prognostic factors (All <i>p</i> < .05). A prognostic model incorporating these variables demonstrated robust predictive accuracy across training, testing, and validation cohorts, with a C-index of around 0.73. In terms of treatment, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were associated with improved survival, while no significant benefit for younger patients and those with early-stage or squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There remains a critical need for early detection methods and the implementation of more personalized treatment strategies. The developed prognostic model provides a framework for risk stratification, supporting the optimization of therapeutic decisions and improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2517883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of dedicated studies addressing the epidemiology, prognostic factors, and optimal management strategies for secondary esophageal cancer (SEC).
Methods: This study sourced data from the SEER database and an independent external cohort. Annual percentage change (APC) was calculated to qualify the incidence trend. Cox regression was employed for survival analysis.
Results: A total of 13,792 sec cases from the SEER database and 63 cases from the validation cohort were included in this study. The incidence of SEC increased from 0.95 per 100,000 persons in 2000 to 1.2 per 100,000 in 2008, stabilizing thereafter. Survival analysis identified disease stage, age, and tumor location as significant prognostic factors (All p < .05). A prognostic model incorporating these variables demonstrated robust predictive accuracy across training, testing, and validation cohorts, with a C-index of around 0.73. In terms of treatment, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were associated with improved survival, while no significant benefit for younger patients and those with early-stage or squamous cell carcinoma.
Conclusions: There remains a critical need for early detection methods and the implementation of more personalized treatment strategies. The developed prognostic model provides a framework for risk stratification, supporting the optimization of therapeutic decisions and improving patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.