Dietary exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and health risk assessment in 7-year-old children in Shandong, China.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yan Zhang, Qian Yao, Rong Shi, Jingguang Li, Angela Vinturache, Guanghe Wang, Xiaoning Lei, Yuxin Wang, Ying Tian, Yu Gao
{"title":"Dietary exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and health risk assessment in 7-year-old children in Shandong, China.","authors":"Yan Zhang, Qian Yao, Rong Shi, Jingguang Li, Angela Vinturache, Guanghe Wang, Xiaoning Lei, Yuxin Wang, Ying Tian, Yu Gao","doi":"10.1289/EHP15157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary intake, especially foods of animal-origin, is an important source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure to the general population. However, the distribution of legacy and emerging PFAS in different food categories is unclear, as well as their potential health risk for children.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate dietary sources of PFAS and evaluate the risk for 7-year-old children in Laizhou Wan, a region with high PFAS exposure in Shandong, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We sampled participants from the Laizhou Wan Birth Cohort study. We administered a dietary questionnaire to the parents of 7-year-old children and measured PFAS compounds in the serum of the children (n = 154) and meat and seafood samples (n = 45). We calculated the Mann-Whitney U test to compare serum PFAS levels between children who frequently consumed a specific type of marine fish or shrimp/shellfish and those who did not. Children's dietary PFAS intake was calculated through multiplying food consumption and PFAS concentrations, and health risks were assessed by comparing the intake of PFAS with health-based guideline values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In seafood, perfluorooctanic acid (PFOA) (0.52 ng/g wet weight (ww)), perfluoro-6-methylheptanesulfonic acid (iso-PFOS) (0.02 ng/g ww), and 6:2 chlorinated polyfluoroethersulfonic acid (0.06 ng/g ww) had the highest median concentrations among 10 linear PFAS, 8 branched isomers of PFOA and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and 3 alternatives, respectively. Particularly, PFOA levels (median, 87.80 ng/g) in <i>Zoarces slongatus</i> (one type of marine fish), were approximately 10-100 times of those in other seafood species. Children who frequently consumed <i>Zoarces slongatus</i> had higher serum PFAS levels, especially PFOA, than those who did not. Seafood intake accounted for more than 80% of the total estimated daily intake of PFAS. The dietary estimated weekly intake values of four PFAS (PFOA, PFOS, perfluorononanoic acid, and perfluorohexanesulfonic acid) for children (7.4 ng/kg of body weight (bw)/week) exceeded the tolerable weekly intake (4.4 ng/kg bw/week) as recommended by the European Food Safety Authority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Seafood was widely contaminated by both legacy PFAS and their alternatives in Laizhou Wan area. Intake of seafood, especially <i>Zoarces slongatus</i>, may contribute greatly to PFAS exposure in 7-year-old children. Avoiding intake of high PFAS polluted seafood may be an important strategy to protect local children. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15157.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dietary intake, especially foods of animal-origin, is an important source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure to the general population. However, the distribution of legacy and emerging PFAS in different food categories is unclear, as well as their potential health risk for children.

Objectives: To investigate dietary sources of PFAS and evaluate the risk for 7-year-old children in Laizhou Wan, a region with high PFAS exposure in Shandong, China.

Methods: We sampled participants from the Laizhou Wan Birth Cohort study. We administered a dietary questionnaire to the parents of 7-year-old children and measured PFAS compounds in the serum of the children (n = 154) and meat and seafood samples (n = 45). We calculated the Mann-Whitney U test to compare serum PFAS levels between children who frequently consumed a specific type of marine fish or shrimp/shellfish and those who did not. Children's dietary PFAS intake was calculated through multiplying food consumption and PFAS concentrations, and health risks were assessed by comparing the intake of PFAS with health-based guideline values.

Results: In seafood, perfluorooctanic acid (PFOA) (0.52 ng/g wet weight (ww)), perfluoro-6-methylheptanesulfonic acid (iso-PFOS) (0.02 ng/g ww), and 6:2 chlorinated polyfluoroethersulfonic acid (0.06 ng/g ww) had the highest median concentrations among 10 linear PFAS, 8 branched isomers of PFOA and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and 3 alternatives, respectively. Particularly, PFOA levels (median, 87.80 ng/g) in Zoarces slongatus (one type of marine fish), were approximately 10-100 times of those in other seafood species. Children who frequently consumed Zoarces slongatus had higher serum PFAS levels, especially PFOA, than those who did not. Seafood intake accounted for more than 80% of the total estimated daily intake of PFAS. The dietary estimated weekly intake values of four PFAS (PFOA, PFOS, perfluorononanoic acid, and perfluorohexanesulfonic acid) for children (7.4 ng/kg of body weight (bw)/week) exceeded the tolerable weekly intake (4.4 ng/kg bw/week) as recommended by the European Food Safety Authority.

Conclusion: Seafood was widely contaminated by both legacy PFAS and their alternatives in Laizhou Wan area. Intake of seafood, especially Zoarces slongatus, may contribute greatly to PFAS exposure in 7-year-old children. Avoiding intake of high PFAS polluted seafood may be an important strategy to protect local children. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15157.

中国山东省7岁儿童饮食中全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质暴露及健康风险评估
背景:膳食摄入,特别是动物性食物,是普通人群接触全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的一个重要来源。然而,遗留的和新出现的PFAS在不同食品类别中的分布尚不清楚,以及它们对儿童的潜在健康风险。目的:调查山东省莱州湾地区7岁儿童PFAS的膳食来源,并评估PFAS高暴露地区的风险。方法:从莱州湾出生队列研究中抽取样本。我们对7岁儿童的父母进行了饮食问卷调查,并测量了儿童血清(n = 154)和肉类和海鲜样品(n = 45)中的PFAS化合物。我们计算了Mann-Whitney U测试,以比较经常食用特定类型海鱼或虾/贝类的儿童与不食用特定类型海鱼或虾/贝类的儿童血清PFAS水平。通过将食物消费量与PFAS浓度相乘来计算儿童膳食中PFAS的摄入量,并通过将PFAS摄入量与基于健康的指数值进行比较来评估健康风险。结果:在海产品中,全氟辛酸(PFOA) (0.52 ng/g湿重(ww))、全氟-6-甲基庚烷磺酸(isopfos) (0.02 ng/g ww)和6:2氯化多氟醚磺酸(0.06 ng/g ww)在10种线性PFAS中浓度中位数最高,PFOA和全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)的8种支链异构体和3种替代品中浓度中位数最高。特别是,长尾鱼(一种海鱼)的全氟辛烷磺酸水平(中位数为87.80 ng/g)约为其他海产品的10-100倍。经常食用蛇尾草的儿童比不食用的儿童血清PFAS水平更高,尤其是PFOA水平。海鲜摄入量占PFAS估计每日总摄入量的80%以上。儿童膳食中四种全氟辛烷磺酸(全氟辛酸、全氟辛烷磺酸、全氟己磺酸)的周摄入量估计值(7.4纳克/公斤体重/周)超过了欧洲食品安全局建议的可耐受周摄入量(4.4纳克/公斤体重/周)。结论:莱州湾地区海产品普遍存在残留PFAS及其替代品污染。7岁儿童食用海鲜,尤其是长尾鱼,可能对PFAS暴露有很大影响。避免摄入高PFAS污染的海产品可能是保护当地儿童的重要策略。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15157。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信