Differential Microbial Composition and Fiber Degradation in Two Sloth Species (Bradypus variegatus and Choloepus hoffmanni).

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Priscila Chaverri, Efraín Escudero-Leyva, Darling Mora-Rojas, Andrea Calvo-Obando, Mariana González, Esteban Escalante-Campos, Esteve Mesén-Porras, Daniela Wicki-Emmenegger, Diego Rojas-Gätjens, Judith Avey-Arroyo, Mariana Campos-Hernández, Erick Castellón, Andrés Moreira-Soto, Jan Felix Drexler, Max Chavarría
{"title":"Differential Microbial Composition and Fiber Degradation in Two Sloth Species (Bradypus variegatus and Choloepus hoffmanni).","authors":"Priscila Chaverri, Efraín Escudero-Leyva, Darling Mora-Rojas, Andrea Calvo-Obando, Mariana González, Esteban Escalante-Campos, Esteve Mesén-Porras, Daniela Wicki-Emmenegger, Diego Rojas-Gätjens, Judith Avey-Arroyo, Mariana Campos-Hernández, Erick Castellón, Andrés Moreira-Soto, Jan Felix Drexler, Max Chavarría","doi":"10.1007/s00284-025-04303-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sloths have the slowest digestion among mammals, requiring 5-20 times longer to digest food than other herbivores, which suggests differences in their gut microbiota, particularly in plant-fiber-degrading microorganisms. Bradypus variegatus has a lower metabolic rate and moves less than Choloepus hoffmanni. However, no comprehensive studies have compared the microbiota (e.g., fungi) of these species. We hypothesized that differences in digestion and metabolism between the two species would be reflected in their microbiota composition and functionality, which we characterized using metagenomics, metabarcoding, and cellulose degradation. Results revealed significant differences in microbiota composition and functionality. Both species are dominated by bacteria; fungi comprised only 0.06-0.5% of metagenomic reads. Neocallimastigomycota, an anaerobic fungus involved in fiber breakdown in other herbivores, was found in low abundance, especially in B. variegatus. Bacterial communities showed subtle differences: C. hoffmanni was dominated by Bacillota and Bacteroidota, while B. variegatus showed higher Actinomycetota. Expected herbivore bacterial taxa (e.g., Fibrobacter and Prevotella) were scarce. Functional analysis showed a low abundance of carbohydrate-active enzymes essential for polysaccharide breakdown. Cellulose degradation assays confirmed that sloths digest only ~ 3-30% of ingested plant material. This research sheds light on the potential multidirectional links between the gut microbiota, metabolism, and digestion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11360,"journal":{"name":"Current Microbiology","volume":"82 7","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-025-04303-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sloths have the slowest digestion among mammals, requiring 5-20 times longer to digest food than other herbivores, which suggests differences in their gut microbiota, particularly in plant-fiber-degrading microorganisms. Bradypus variegatus has a lower metabolic rate and moves less than Choloepus hoffmanni. However, no comprehensive studies have compared the microbiota (e.g., fungi) of these species. We hypothesized that differences in digestion and metabolism between the two species would be reflected in their microbiota composition and functionality, which we characterized using metagenomics, metabarcoding, and cellulose degradation. Results revealed significant differences in microbiota composition and functionality. Both species are dominated by bacteria; fungi comprised only 0.06-0.5% of metagenomic reads. Neocallimastigomycota, an anaerobic fungus involved in fiber breakdown in other herbivores, was found in low abundance, especially in B. variegatus. Bacterial communities showed subtle differences: C. hoffmanni was dominated by Bacillota and Bacteroidota, while B. variegatus showed higher Actinomycetota. Expected herbivore bacterial taxa (e.g., Fibrobacter and Prevotella) were scarce. Functional analysis showed a low abundance of carbohydrate-active enzymes essential for polysaccharide breakdown. Cellulose degradation assays confirmed that sloths digest only ~ 3-30% of ingested plant material. This research sheds light on the potential multidirectional links between the gut microbiota, metabolism, and digestion.

两种树懒的微生物组成和纤维降解差异(变种树懒和霍氏树懒)。
树懒的消化能力是哺乳动物中最慢的,消化食物的时间是其他食草动物的5-20倍,这表明它们的肠道微生物群存在差异,尤其是降解植物纤维的微生物。变色龙的代谢率较低,活动也比霍氏螯虾少。然而,没有全面的研究比较这些物种的微生物群(如真菌)。我们假设两个物种之间的消化和代谢差异将反映在它们的微生物群组成和功能上,我们使用宏基因组学,元条形码和纤维素降解来表征。结果显示,微生物群组成和功能存在显著差异。这两个物种都以细菌为主;真菌仅占宏基因组读数的0.06-0.5%。Neocallimastigomycota是一种在其他食草动物中参与纤维分解的厌氧真菌,丰度较低,特别是在b.s variegatus中。细菌群落存在细微差异:C. hoffmanni以杆菌门和拟杆菌门为主,B. variegatus以放线菌门为主。预期的草食细菌分类群(如纤维杆菌和普雷沃氏菌)很少。功能分析表明,多糖分解所必需的碳水化合物活性酶丰度较低。纤维素降解试验证实树懒只消化约3-30%摄入的植物物质。这项研究揭示了肠道微生物群、新陈代谢和消化之间潜在的多向联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Microbiology
Current Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
380
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Current Microbiology is a well-established journal that publishes articles in all aspects of microbial cells and the interactions between the microorganisms, their hosts and the environment. Current Microbiology publishes original research articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor, spanning the following areas: physiology, biochemistry, genetics, genomics, biotechnology, ecology, evolution, morphology, taxonomy, diagnostic methods, medical and clinical microbiology and immunology as applied to microorganisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信