A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Neratinib With or Without Fulvestrant for Patients With HER2-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Stefania Morganti, Xiangying Chu, Tarah J Ballinger, Nisha Unni, Sarah Sinclair, Robert Wesolowski, Alyssa M Pereslete, Paulina Lange, Nabihah Tayob, Nancy U Lin, Jose P Leone, Ian E Krop, Sara M Tolaney, Heather A Parsons
{"title":"A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Neratinib With or Without Fulvestrant for Patients With HER2-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.","authors":"Stefania Morganti, Xiangying Chu, Tarah J Ballinger, Nisha Unni, Sarah Sinclair, Robert Wesolowski, Alyssa M Pereslete, Paulina Lange, Nabihah Tayob, Nancy U Lin, Jose P Leone, Ian E Krop, Sara M Tolaney, Heather A Parsons","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most HER2-positive breast cancers co-express estrogen receptor (ER). Given crosstalk between HER2 and ER signaling pathways, dual blockade may be beneficial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial, patients with ER-positive (ER ≥ 10%), HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer were randomized (1:1) to neratinib (240 mg daily) or the same dose of neratinib with fulvestrant. Any number of prior therapies was allowed; prior trastuzumab, pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine were required. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate, and duration of response. Exploratory objectives included the identification of predictive biomarkers via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 21 patients enrolled, 18 were evaluable for outcomes and safety (neratinib-fulvestrant arm, n = 8; neratinib-only arm, n = 10). The study was closed before completing enrollment due to slow accrual. Median PFS did not differ between treatment arms (2.79 months with neratinib-fulvestrant versus 5.55 months with neratinib only [HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.24-3.64; P = .98]). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 1 (12.5%) patient in the neratinib-fulvestrant arm and 6 (60%) patients in the neratinib-only arm, with diarrhea being the most frequent. Median OS did not differ between the 2 arms (P = .91). Clearance of ctDNA was associated with PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of neratinib and fulvestrant is safe and tolerable. Due to early study closure, this study was underpowered to detect the benefit of adding fulvestrant to neratinib. Chemotherapy-free regimens targeting ER and HER2 warrant further investigation, along with prospective studies investigating ctDNA dynamics may guide treatment switch.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.05.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Most HER2-positive breast cancers co-express estrogen receptor (ER). Given crosstalk between HER2 and ER signaling pathways, dual blockade may be beneficial.
Methods: In this randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial, patients with ER-positive (ER ≥ 10%), HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer were randomized (1:1) to neratinib (240 mg daily) or the same dose of neratinib with fulvestrant. Any number of prior therapies was allowed; prior trastuzumab, pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine were required. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate, and duration of response. Exploratory objectives included the identification of predictive biomarkers via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).
Results: Of 21 patients enrolled, 18 were evaluable for outcomes and safety (neratinib-fulvestrant arm, n = 8; neratinib-only arm, n = 10). The study was closed before completing enrollment due to slow accrual. Median PFS did not differ between treatment arms (2.79 months with neratinib-fulvestrant versus 5.55 months with neratinib only [HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.24-3.64; P = .98]). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 1 (12.5%) patient in the neratinib-fulvestrant arm and 6 (60%) patients in the neratinib-only arm, with diarrhea being the most frequent. Median OS did not differ between the 2 arms (P = .91). Clearance of ctDNA was associated with PFS and OS.
Conclusions: The combination of neratinib and fulvestrant is safe and tolerable. Due to early study closure, this study was underpowered to detect the benefit of adding fulvestrant to neratinib. Chemotherapy-free regimens targeting ER and HER2 warrant further investigation, along with prospective studies investigating ctDNA dynamics may guide treatment switch.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.