Screening accuracy of Single-Point Insulin Sensitivity Estimator (SPISE) for metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Alireza Azarboo, Parisa Fallahtafti, Sayeh Jalali, Amirhossein Shirinezhad, Ramin Assempoor, Amirhossein Ghaseminejad-Raeini
{"title":"Screening accuracy of Single-Point Insulin Sensitivity Estimator (SPISE) for metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Alireza Azarboo, Parisa Fallahtafti, Sayeh Jalali, Amirhossein Shirinezhad, Ramin Assempoor, Amirhossein Ghaseminejad-Raeini","doi":"10.1186/s12902-025-01957-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a multifactorial condition linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. The Single-Point Insulin Sensitivity Estimator (SPISE), a non-invasive index calculated via 600 × HDL-C^0.185 / (TG^0.2 × BMI^1.338), offers a practical alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the accuracy of SPISE as an indicator for MetS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. We searched databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, focusing on studies evaluating SPISE's screening accuracy for MetS. Eligible studies were observational, reporting mean SPISE values and its predictive performance. Meta-analyses were performed using Hedges' g standardized mean differences (SMD) and pooled area under the curve (AUC) estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies comprising 12,919 participants were included, with an age range of 9.2 ± 2.1 to 52.4 ± 11.0. Individuals with MetS had significantly lower SPISE scores than controls (SMD = -0.94, 95% CI: -1.25 to -0.63). The pooled AUC for SPISE as a predictor of MetS was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83 to 0.90), surpassing other insulin resistance indices like HOMA-IR and the triglyceride/HDL-C ratio. Meta-regression showed that systolic and diastolic blood pressure were potential sources of heterogeneity and age, gender, BMI, waist circumference, fasting blood glucose, triglyceride, and HDL did not contribute to heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPISE is a highly accurate and non-invasive tool for predicting MetS, potentially outperforming traditional indices like HOMA-IR. Its ease of use and precision make it a valuable clinical screening tool, especially in diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":"25 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-025-01957-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a multifactorial condition linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. The Single-Point Insulin Sensitivity Estimator (SPISE), a non-invasive index calculated via 600 × HDL-C^0.185 / (TG^0.2 × BMI^1.338), offers a practical alternative. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the accuracy of SPISE as an indicator for MetS.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. We searched databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, focusing on studies evaluating SPISE's screening accuracy for MetS. Eligible studies were observational, reporting mean SPISE values and its predictive performance. Meta-analyses were performed using Hedges' g standardized mean differences (SMD) and pooled area under the curve (AUC) estimates.

Results: Seven studies comprising 12,919 participants were included, with an age range of 9.2 ± 2.1 to 52.4 ± 11.0. Individuals with MetS had significantly lower SPISE scores than controls (SMD = -0.94, 95% CI: -1.25 to -0.63). The pooled AUC for SPISE as a predictor of MetS was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83 to 0.90), surpassing other insulin resistance indices like HOMA-IR and the triglyceride/HDL-C ratio. Meta-regression showed that systolic and diastolic blood pressure were potential sources of heterogeneity and age, gender, BMI, waist circumference, fasting blood glucose, triglyceride, and HDL did not contribute to heterogeneity.

Conclusions: SPISE is a highly accurate and non-invasive tool for predicting MetS, potentially outperforming traditional indices like HOMA-IR. Its ease of use and precision make it a valuable clinical screening tool, especially in diverse populations.

单点胰岛素敏感性估计器(SPISE)对代谢综合征的筛选准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:代谢综合征(MetS)是一种与心血管疾病和2型糖尿病风险增加相关的多因素疾病。单点胰岛素敏感性估计器(SPISE)是一种通过600 × HDL-C^0.185 / (TG^0.2 × BMI^1.338)计算的非侵入性指数,提供了一种实用的替代方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估SPISE作为MetS指标的准确性。方法:我们按照PRISMA指南进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们检索了MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase等数据库,重点关注评估SPISE对MetS筛查准确性的研究。符合条件的研究为观察性研究,报告SPISE平均值及其预测性能。meta分析使用Hedges的标准化平均差异(SMD)和曲线下汇总面积(AUC)估计进行。结果:纳入7项研究,12919名受试者,年龄范围为9.2±2.1 ~ 52.4±11.0岁。met患者的SPISE评分显著低于对照组(SMD = -0.94, 95% CI: -1.25至-0.63)。SPISE作为met预测因子的汇总AUC为0.86 (95% CI: 0.83 - 0.90),超过了其他胰岛素抵抗指标,如HOMA-IR和甘油三酯/HDL-C比值。荟萃回归显示收缩压和舒张压是异质性的潜在来源,而年龄、性别、BMI、腰围、空腹血糖、甘油三酯和HDL对异质性没有贡献。结论:SPISE是一种高度准确且无创的预测MetS的工具,潜在优于传统指标如HOMA-IR。它的易用性和准确性使其成为一种有价值的临床筛查工具,特别是在不同的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信