Patient and clinician perspectives on misgendering in healthcare.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kyle Okamuro, Alan Card, Hanna J Barton, Falisha Kanji, Victor Trasvina, Jill Blumenthal, Tara Cohen, Jennifer T Anger
{"title":"Patient and clinician perspectives on misgendering in healthcare.","authors":"Kyle Okamuro, Alan Card, Hanna J Barton, Falisha Kanji, Victor Trasvina, Jill Blumenthal, Tara Cohen, Jennifer T Anger","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Misgendering of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals in healthcare settings can lead to worsened mental and physical health outcomes and decreased utilisation of care. Few studies have investigated the factors that contribute to this phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to apply qualitative methods to explore sources of misgendering, its perceived impact, prevention strategies and clinician responses to accidentally misgendering a patient, as identified by TGNB patients and gender-affirming care clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April and June 2022, 20 semi-structured interviews were performed at an academic medical centre in Southern California. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling and included: (1) TGNB patients (n=8) recruited from an interdisciplinary gender-affirming urological practice and (2) gender-affirming care clinicians (n=12) recruited from a regional interdisciplinary Gender Health conference, three of whom identified as TGNB. Interviews were conducted in person or virtually using an open-ended topic guide, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis was performed by two independent study personnel who hand-coded the transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four overarching themes were identified: (1) misgendering originates from multiple sources, (2) misgendering discourages individual access to healthcare, creates community hesitation and its perceived impact is modified by setting and intentionality, (3) building a gender-affirming healthcare system requires integration of behaviour, policy and technology and (4) clinicians respond to accidental misgendering by acknowledging, apologising, advancing and acting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that misgendering arises from both interpersonal communication and structural factors within healthcare systems, leading to perceived harm and diminished TGNB access to health services. Any potential solution to reduce this phenomenon will require a multifaceted approach integrating behavioural, technological and institutional policy strategies with system-level implementation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018364","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Misgendering of transgender and non-binary (TGNB) individuals in healthcare settings can lead to worsened mental and physical health outcomes and decreased utilisation of care. Few studies have investigated the factors that contribute to this phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to apply qualitative methods to explore sources of misgendering, its perceived impact, prevention strategies and clinician responses to accidentally misgendering a patient, as identified by TGNB patients and gender-affirming care clinicians.

Methods: Between April and June 2022, 20 semi-structured interviews were performed at an academic medical centre in Southern California. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling and included: (1) TGNB patients (n=8) recruited from an interdisciplinary gender-affirming urological practice and (2) gender-affirming care clinicians (n=12) recruited from a regional interdisciplinary Gender Health conference, three of whom identified as TGNB. Interviews were conducted in person or virtually using an open-ended topic guide, audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive thematic analysis was performed by two independent study personnel who hand-coded the transcripts.

Results: Four overarching themes were identified: (1) misgendering originates from multiple sources, (2) misgendering discourages individual access to healthcare, creates community hesitation and its perceived impact is modified by setting and intentionality, (3) building a gender-affirming healthcare system requires integration of behaviour, policy and technology and (4) clinicians respond to accidental misgendering by acknowledging, apologising, advancing and acting.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that misgendering arises from both interpersonal communication and structural factors within healthcare systems, leading to perceived harm and diminished TGNB access to health services. Any potential solution to reduce this phenomenon will require a multifaceted approach integrating behavioural, technological and institutional policy strategies with system-level implementation efforts.

患者和临床医生对医疗保健中性别歧视的看法。
目的:医疗机构中跨性别和非二元性别(TGNB)个体的性别错误可导致精神和身体健康结果恶化,并降低护理的利用率。很少有研究调查导致这一现象的因素。本研究的目的是运用定性方法探讨TGNB患者和性别确认护理临床医生发现的误性别的来源,其感知影响,预防策略和临床医生对意外误性别患者的反应。方法:在2022年4月至6月期间,在南加州的一个学术医疗中心进行了20次半结构化访谈。参与者通过有目的抽样招募,包括:(1)从跨学科性别确认泌尿科诊所招募的TGNB患者(n=8)和(2)从区域跨学科性别健康会议招募的性别确认护理临床医生(n=12),其中3人被确定为TGNB。采访是亲自或使用开放式主题指南进行的,录音并逐字抄写。由两名独立的研究人员进行归纳专题分析,并对记录进行手工编码。结果:本研究确定了四个主要主题:(1)性别错认的根源是多方面的;(2)性别错认阻碍了个人获得医疗服务,造成了社区的犹豫,其感知影响受环境和意向性的影响;(3)建立性别肯定医疗体系需要行为、政策和技术的整合;(4)临床医生通过承认、道歉、推进和行动来应对意外的性别错认。结论:我们的数据表明,性别错误源于卫生保健系统内的人际沟通和结构性因素,导致感知伤害和减少TGNB获得卫生服务的机会。任何减少这一现象的潜在解决办法都需要采取多方面的办法,将行为、技术和体制政策战略与系统一级的执行努力结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信